Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750958AbWCSUvg (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:51:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750987AbWCSUvg (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:51:36 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:62378 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750937AbWCSUvf (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:51:35 -0500 Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 12:47:01 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Linus Torvalds Cc: viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, kernel-stuff@comcast.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alex-kernel@digriz.org.uk, jun.nakajima@intel.com, davej@redhat.com Subject: Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative Message-Id: <20060319124701.41e16e7b.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <200603181525.14127.kernel-stuff@comcast.net> <20060318165302.62851448.akpm@osdl.org> <20060319194004.GZ27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 591 Lines: 17 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > For me, it made a 4970 byte difference in code size. > That's about the same saving as uninlining first_cpu() and next_cpu() provides. Anything which iterates across multiple CPUs is cachemiss heaven - I doubt if this is performance-critical code. Or at least if it is, we have bigger problems.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/