Received: by 2002:a25:ef43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w3csp698028ybm; Fri, 29 May 2020 10:00:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxyhnJ7cQkCh5eOC4DDhR4N7llGIaT6r8tMTR453GYjv5nTLX8TC03P+dP2mpehYlYICqoV X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c607:: with SMTP id h7mr9450556edq.214.1590771604964; Fri, 29 May 2020 10:00:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1590771604; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=g1t2H1JzihQnsqrsZBP6aQOM1FlyeJ/sbY0MVSRBsYwC4/DUpE2TXKn/17l3G5apwH RiKVfi+8Ct2/HKT8+gM37LcaEtLWgQeENK9GsjDMeXuB4EWfSDtLKMI4Ao036DsvwHzZ GrKVk5G01/XEf8h6C9sauuThKP4AeIERmPQdsfbPxFjCdD1MoO925dQtBqG3tc+HBIsf vo5mZ19C/AOqSV4vTZ+1sTVMTCil68vwItP/yDlDl1PwNBhm0WYcIbQDBicMh2tCF4HG 3jvib1rgg3drmVh9jSAfuCr+uZ/SJ+93NIMZEHFATzkbZlLoyoCHylygnIt6DEwnNAvB uTkw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=t7uCYlSQRgwu4InMS8nwM3vB4VrfyrsGsAykaL670UQ=; b=NAovRhUDB683iW6TnoIlCjtfVlvwairA7CIn1t+ocXqqAsNh6SBfZYpcLMttl/p1Bf CPAuBC2PucAjUnjtUvlbWDuph4a/pv3ArCnWESSAGcAuxCP9kJnQhyCx5bvXVBw9mXdB 25dlOaaFT4sWuxYPK/jKvHYFbkfOnE/9ZQUs3ihQTxGanf64cw/t6eebmLowCJBMaQft Ettss2ldj+DG8x27XNbQ00rKtWpNdHRtNZzCzx1f6r/ZTHvdkIHUxNaU4Ob2G2WUqTDO V2u7q5ayBfyvsfy/ikfWK3bA1aRSEn8ge+C81PhsG0Kdz/Cezw220lrCWp5jA6p3hMXK DpcQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dn20si9459202ejc.319.2020.05.29.09.59.41; Fri, 29 May 2020 10:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726999AbgE2Q5q (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 29 May 2020 12:57:46 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59350 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725601AbgE2Q5q (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2020 12:57:46 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA8DAC2C; Fri, 29 May 2020 16:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 17:57:39 +0100 From: Mel Gorman To: Qais Yousef Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Randy Dunlap , Jonathan Corbet , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Luis Chamberlain , Kees Cook , Iurii Zaikin , Quentin Perret , Valentin Schneider , Patrick Bellasi , Pavan Kondeti , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/uclamp: Add a new sysctl to control RT default boost value Message-ID: <20200529165739.GD3070@suse.de> References: <20200511154053.7822-1-qais.yousef@arm.com> <20200528132327.GB706460@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200528155800.yjrmx3hj72xreryh@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20200528161112.GI2483@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200529100806.GA3070@suse.de> <20200529160423.qsrbzxtcx2jslljk@e107158-lin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200529160423.qsrbzxtcx2jslljk@e107158-lin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > A lot of the uclamp functions appear to be inlined so it is not be > > particularly obvious from a raw profile but it shows up in the annotated > > profile in activate_task and dequeue_task for example. In the case of > > dequeue_task, uclamp_rq_dec_id() is extremely expensive according to the > > annotated profile. > > > > I'm afraid I did not dig into this deeply once I knew I could just disable > > it even within the distribution. > > Could by any chance the vmlinux (with debug symbols hopefully) and perf.dat are > still lying around to share? > I didn't preserve the vmlinux files. I can recreate them if you have problems reproducing this locally. The "perf archive" files and profile data can be downloaded at http://www.skynet.ie/~mel/postings/netperf-20200529/profile.tar.gz which should be enough for an annotated profile to compare with a local run. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs