Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932222AbWCTIWM (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 03:22:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932221AbWCTIWM (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 03:22:12 -0500 Received: from pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.125]:47070 "HELO pop5-1.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932222AbWCTIWM (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 03:22:12 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:22:08 +0100 Message-Id: <200603200822.k2K8M8i29761@inv.it.uc3m.es> From: "Peter T. Breuer" To: Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel In-Reply-To: <20060320061212.GG21493@w.ods.org> User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.15 (i686)) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1596 Lines: 41 In article <20060320061212.GG21493@w.ods.org> you wrote: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 11:33:17AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> Of course, I shouldn't say "works", since it is still totally untested. It >> _looks_ good, and that statement expression usage is just _so_ ugly it's >> cute. > #define for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask) \ > for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < NR_CPUS; (cpu)++) { \ > unsigned long __bits = (mask).bits[0] >> (cpu); \ > if (!__bits) \ > break; \ > if (!__bits & 1) \ > continue; \ > else While that's slightly wrong (needs a closing } supplied by the user), it does inspire me to point out that one can put the skips in the ordinary statement part of the for and use the if else idea to make sure that the for needs just one statement following (i.e. no dangling } supplied by the user) #define for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask) \ for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < NR_CPUS; (cpu)++) \ if (!((mask).bits[0] >> (cpu)) { \ break; \ } else if (!((mask).bits[0] >> (cpu)) & 1) { \ continue; \ } else I expect common subexpression optimization in the compiler to remove the repetition here. If not, somebody else can think about it! Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/