Received: by 2002:a25:ef43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w3csp912357ybm; Fri, 29 May 2020 15:30:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwDpGNZDn26Ga4W3hfJapsn+HOG4mJj/DEfZfuji0RevMP+WajxUb7nFmDSca+R+6akCuWi X-Received: by 2002:a50:9ee4:: with SMTP id a91mr10944766edf.172.1590791459544; Fri, 29 May 2020 15:30:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1590791459; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iUgb//rHmfBPs2zBssgutDpwZPiY4eFoqD1pXiMBrJc2/yoX8599GQQgn78iO2Xjlj PndtkHN2aCj3M5komPWUTG8SMJhuT8CffbG1s7E0BNlCZpu/PQj9A8lwVVwttKn0+fsv 7JA5JR1dXPariuFPsBRfyUwmyitQr0xuPASDCVN0f4WaTBlRgK1i4Or/XvLJsPvACDgx +YjMLAuqrSza4HoKI9HEiihFnaUBE/xEAwSDYBpQLAEdO7mkiB1VKxlF09PpO9/zep+Y JOTIdOguNlTm+G1jkeKgU4b60pTV6/mIi+3yRlg5BW3vs62o63V8YFEmamFw5UUG/6nt 2ROw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=lVYA/yfJI5TaEakm/6pSuFTgrszvzSslMQr1boHj+eo=; b=RfgKKmGL8sgAgSA885W87mPe3mktJCOqQdI5ili6WBTbnpgBSpWC5L2L+C9u0JPBYl KrktX6ggVd3xST2l8aetp9Dq3MLY5/pd/vVVKtoK8b5CvtZTwwz/Y1Rn/EaeZtH1q619 PlqeVtsEjMGLKmrhZyQ56zLEJr0K9SZplrxz6dKl1zF3nwmStDvthR/BdyXc8oeXUU8O 3mDYsMxMsaYDRaLAy2edyRpElKgj4ccPH514wraqKOit12Xq9PR3TX5m5JVUMbFD4Fzr q00N0exMErfBjk9DI9ybPJK9IKGJcI4+aUdM1d9DF2vyIeUqEynHzdlE+mG3jECaQJ7I /HUA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=exi6dF1W; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y4si6722228edt.104.2020.05.29.15.30.36; Fri, 29 May 2020 15:30:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=exi6dF1W; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727947AbgE2W0z (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 29 May 2020 18:26:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58620 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726555AbgE2W0z (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2020 18:26:55 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x441.google.com (mail-wr1-x441.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::441]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0852C03E969; Fri, 29 May 2020 15:26:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x441.google.com with SMTP id l10so5653514wrr.10; Fri, 29 May 2020 15:26:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lVYA/yfJI5TaEakm/6pSuFTgrszvzSslMQr1boHj+eo=; b=exi6dF1WzRA3XY16RKHO13lNKswIwJP7uC6wlvK8Y9yoj74aobAfBue4fIUJAGdinp ZqVMKkCF8ytXI9KjjHqwRr7Kt4CByh3tunV2QFsG/iWcWmGptqgTZG9v4mLPUcu4p12y mAl9H21i1w/VFdgMLkpKqPKU8c6N0qNfaSYpDk2VjQ1oXiKZ3p5Xn886PiKFN9O2BSP6 P94a2dRSgYjtoNxKCAXXqK8l7ola0bk/sQ6tnX7BzGcMyLxY1QS4ByDqlL5EiZzXAbsi TXkDZvBGkfldwNRc94dskWjwLbrpXidWAxe0ihKdLrkTwUvkzEhAC5Lj4yaLzNM+VtxD T15g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lVYA/yfJI5TaEakm/6pSuFTgrszvzSslMQr1boHj+eo=; b=FxkRg/sHdE01u1bZv5qejFCyrOTxwS3amY8is4FLjd/jzjWBy78OI4nXX+eJ9yOi4S Q2HvcPL/szlpV1GXd3WpYLcG/8gvnzkmKqrPoLBMcgM+bCBzL0lnDLbBBkmPBTwteDWX puy7bYMN66++5l7R3CPLgfaZzYYNj14CZ6PtdouiTgVs+Tozz1QHqSjzzJzUWhqn+0gN K3VBO5rtQ9ZFWD0S/RJSOxC/AXsiejFn3oLpCKf+xeMXJYQLqf5G6sLwdu/RuU+AxR8i 5AxKZIQ9YMfswhzztQOb+zfdTgcN0lAWbe1z9Ob1SzPN7pnUN/KaO7Dp1b//XIa48xTi WoYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5317G4hOZ++cv9I85LBO1S0sLTPvLh7p7f3RMzRqF0AI+TE/qhvh TyDh4aoQYDeXHymdm3CKV7ueVm0R X-Received: by 2002:adf:e749:: with SMTP id c9mr11503516wrn.25.1590791182273; Fri, 29 May 2020 15:26:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2003:ea:8f23:5700:cfc:56dc:3d49:4699? (p200300ea8f2357000cfc56dc3d494699.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:ea:8f23:5700:cfc:56dc:3d49:4699]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 23sm1243387wmo.18.2020.05.29.15.26.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 29 May 2020 15:26:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Lost PCIe PME after a914ff2d78ce ("PCI/ASPM: Don't select CONFIG_PCIEASPM by default") To: Matthew Garrett , Bjorn Helgaas Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Bjorn Helgaas , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org References: <20200529202135.GA461617@bjorn-Precision-5520> <20200529205900.whx3mxuvt6ijlqwg@srcf.ucam.org> From: Heiner Kallweit Message-ID: <824d63d8-668c-22c8-a303-b44e30e805e1@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 00:26:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200529205900.whx3mxuvt6ijlqwg@srcf.ucam.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29.05.2020 22:59, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 03:21:35PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> Yeah, that makes sense. I can't remember the details, but I'm pretty >> sure there's a reason why we ask for the whole set of things. Seems >> like it solved some problem. I think Matthew Garrett might have been >> involved in that. > > This was https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638912 - some > firmware misbehaves unless you pass the same set of supported > functionality as Windows does. > Current situation means that PME is unusable on all systems where pcie_aspm_support_enabled() returns false, what is basically every system except EXPERT mode is enabled and CONFIG_PCIEASPM is set. So we definitely need to do something. One question is whether the system from the 10yr old bug report actually depends on OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL control, or whether some other change in recent years fixed the issue. Not sure whether the system is still available for re-testing. If worst case we have 10yr old systems breaking with a new kernel then we still would have the workaround to enable CONFIG_PCIEASPM on that system.