Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sat, 30 May 2020 21:19:40 +0000
From:   Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: make a test module with get_count_order/long
Message-ID: <20200530211940.yninqlngnzfvsvki@master>
Reply-To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
References: <20200530004328.30530-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
 <20200530102531.GA1634618@smile.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200530102531.GA1634618@smile.fi.intel.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 01:25:31PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 12:43:28AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
>> A test module to make sure get_count_order/long returns the correct result.
>
>>  lib/Kconfig.debug                  | 13 ++++++
>>  lib/Makefile                       |  2 +
>>  lib/test_getorder.c                | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>I didn't get why it's not a part of test_bitops?
>

I see the document of test_bitops says it does exercise on clear_bit and
set_bit. So not sure it is proper to put them together.

>-- 
>With Best Regards,
>Andy Shevchenko
>

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me