Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932246AbWCTMT2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 07:19:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932248AbWCTMT1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 07:19:27 -0500 Received: from a1819.adsl.pool.eol.hu ([81.0.120.41]:7360 "EHLO dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932246AbWCTMT1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 07:19:27 -0500 To: matthew@wil.cx CC: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-reply-to: <20060320121107.GE8980@parisc-linux.org> (message from Matthew Wilcox on Mon, 20 Mar 2006 05:11:07 -0700) Subject: Re: DoS with POSIX file locks? References: <20060320121107.GE8980@parisc-linux.org> Message-Id: From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:19:12 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 443 Lines: 13 > > Unlike open files there doesn't seem to be any limit on the number of > > locks being held either globally or by a single process. > > RLIMIT_LOCKS Which is not actually used anywhere. Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/