Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sat, 30 May 2020 21:22:25 +0000
From:   Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To:     Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
        christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitops: use the same mechanism for get_count_order[_long]
Message-ID: <20200530212225.l2zbkq5mrvkabxik@master>
Reply-To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
References: <20200525215958.21653-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200525215958.21653-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Andrew,

Would you mind picking up this one? The test module doesn't show any warning
after this on applied.

On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 09:59:58PM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
>These two functions share the same logic.
>
>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
>---
> include/linux/bitops.h | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/bitops.h b/include/linux/bitops.h
>index 5b5609e81a84..80703ef27aee 100644
>--- a/include/linux/bitops.h
>+++ b/include/linux/bitops.h
>@@ -188,12 +188,10 @@ static inline unsigned fls_long(unsigned long l)
> 
> static inline int get_count_order(unsigned int count)
> {
>-	int order;
>+	if (count == 0)
>+		return -1;
> 
>-	order = fls(count) - 1;
>-	if (count & (count - 1))
>-		order++;
>-	return order;
>+	return fls(--count);
> }
> 
> /**
>-- 
>2.23.0

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me