Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] sh: remove sh5 support
To:     John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
        ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
References: <20200424221948.1120587-1-arnd@arndb.de>
 <20200507143552.GA28683@infradead.org> <20200528054600.GA29717@infradead.org>
 <20200528161416.GY1079@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <20200529143059.GA25475@infradead.org>
 <20200529175335.GK1079@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <e86e1d78-9597-811a-da0e-42a910b0c9fe@physik.fu-berlin.de>
From:   Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Message-ID: <8b4ff7fe-c10c-fc8e-72bc-88ef69bdb2b4@landley.net>
Date:   Sat, 30 May 2020 22:20:25 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e86e1d78-9597-811a-da0e-42a910b0c9fe@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 5/30/20 3:08 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 5/29/20 7:53 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
>> Frustratingly, I _still_ don't have an official tree on kernel.org for
>> the purpose of being the canonical place for linux-next to pull from,
>> due to policies around pgp keys and nobody following up on signing
>> mine. This is all really silly since there are ridiculously many
>> independent channels I could cryptographically validate identity
>> through with vanishing probability that they're all compromised. For
>> the time being I'll reactivate my repo on git.musl-libc.org.
> 
> May I suggest to pick up these patches, for example? There might be
> more I missed, but getting these merged should already help a lot with
> the clean-up of arch/sh.

Does that include the 2 fixes to build with current binutils I made puppy eyes
about last -rc7 (in march)?

https://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=158544749818664&w=2

Rob