Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:33:52 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Wu Fengguang <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] latency-tracing-v2.6.16
Message-ID: <20060320143352.GA22171@elte.hu>
References: <20060320101307.GA15477@elte.hu> <20060320142409.GA5769@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060320142409.GA5769@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 668
Lines: 20


* Wu Fengguang <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn> wrote:

> If one (as I did at the first attempt) selects a CPU type of 
> "586/K5/5x86/6x86/6x86MX", he will get nothing from 
> /proc/latency_trace.
> 
> So does it make sense to add dependency lines like the following one?
> 
>         depends on (!X86_32 || X86_GENERIC || X86_TSC)

yeah, makes sense - i've added this too and have uploaded an updated 
version of the patch.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/