Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp329444ybg; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 02:27:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz6/siGR1YFzkn7MZQr1IZa6OIcTWGtTSxUKD4T2fkFK+/L2adU4bM6tBNkqY7uBebb8kDp X-Received: by 2002:a50:fd19:: with SMTP id i25mr19257905eds.248.1591003657284; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 02:27:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591003657; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0Je51veVNNbl1nFvlW9XZbhCulORxp6CwWA1qHRiGPdAG9cxn63IUQaD+eGMA45R4G JMrC9haoOTz14sandG3t4UXzQTfyH5Ec+FDsecSfwY3KOt3iqXrsx4xySGFREHU26sjA weQHzfS3CTSC1AQ/+rVZyNsPwoHWDSygNUYOYThA6UxnEtGsd8G6+zVMpFDs3arzZALL Hxkr3yercG2gfoQuWNc4uDAUl2l7155aI/Ye9QuZiGy+Yk5HNlQJQvg5BUlxT3JFUoQ5 DDXQSVo1Kfm9SFpmYmKp2NEM8IeRrXNABZklxJca+a8THsYnAUjIJusfaT5i0AX/t9BB g8Ug== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=vByTibyjiwgjdmSbkLJHmNaezxD4R5UF9mvVmk7R2pY=; b=cQV2Wt55WTzLBWF5yVWC4qQCC+PYxbKZ4mnUWj4i0L8MpwQcFsLRmUP62YGPUtJGCS /4KtjFmY5Mkz6SCMkHz/clQ6rJAe58ZcnIo8Lue6q1tqbJMlJ9h5W8QbCa6oSVYU0VEM xqx14EQRmVR2hMgiq9XTTcbuUSd5eJt1AtGk5mE1zaYz0N6Ql3FLqPNZYtjaY6ePbB/h nD2L6+s7WAzs2EecjwetPrOiZWh1kk+BIKiuGbY9+RuoVkfsWnbGruJF1a/xUNHgyuvd 8PHatVGJqFbezjxU2bdLV5ocDRWoKBscPpUj8pAtpCSd9u1JvsAM8P2rOn4iSNnqgmZA sWBg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i24si9878772edq.251.2020.06.01.02.27.14; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 02:27:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725974AbgFAJXe (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 1 Jun 2020 05:23:34 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:35422 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725290AbgFAJXd (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2020 05:23:33 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095D01FB; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 02:23:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E18B23F305; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 02:23:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 10:23:29 +0100 From: Dave Martin To: Keno Fischer Cc: Kyle Huey , Catalin Marinas , Oleg Nesterov , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: arm64: Register modification during syscall entry/exit stop Message-ID: <20200601092329.GX5031@arm.com> References: <20200519081551.GA9980@willie-the-truck> <20200520174149.GB27629@willie-the-truck> <20200527095528.GC11111@willie-the-truck> <20200527101929.GT5031@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 12:20:51PM -0400, Keno Fischer wrote: > > Can't PTRACE_SYSEMU be emulated by using PTRACE_SYSCALL, cancelling the > > syscall at the syscall enter stop, then modifying the regs at the > > syscall exit stop? > > Yes, it can. The idea behind SYSEMU is to be able to save half the > ptrace traps that would require, in theory making the ptracer > a decent amount faster. That said, the x7 issue is orthogonal to > SYSEMU, you'd have the same issues if you used PTRACE_SYSCALL. Right, I just wondered whether there was some deeper difference between the two approaches. Cheers ---Dave