Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v5 0/12] Add support for async buffered reads
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To:     sedat.dilek@gmail.com
Cc:     io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org
References: <20200526195123.29053-1-axboe@kernel.dk>
 <CA+icZUWfX+QmroE6j74C7o-BdfMF5=6PdYrA=5W_JCKddqkJgQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <bab2d6f8-4c65-be21-6a8e-29b76c06807d@kernel.dk>
 <CA+icZUUgazqLRwnbQgFPhCa5vAsAvJhjCGMYs7KYBZgA04mSyw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+icZUUwz5TPpT_zS=P4MZBDzzrAcFvZMUce8mJu8M1C7KNO5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+icZUVJT8X3zyafrgbkJppsp4nJEKaLjYNs1kX8H+aY1Y10Qw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+icZUWHOYcGUpw4gfT7xP2Twr15YbyXiWA_=Mc+f7NgzZCETw@mail.gmail.com>
 <230d3380-0269-d113-2c32-6e4fb94b79b8@kernel.dk>
 <CA+icZUXxmOA-5+dukCgxfSp4eVHB+QaAHO6tsgq0iioQs3Af-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+icZUV4iSjL8=wLA3qd1c5OQHX2s1M5VKj2CmJoy2rHmzSVbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+icZUXkWG=08rz9Lp1-ZaRCs+GMTwEiUaFLze9xpL2SpZbdsQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <cdb3ac15-0c41-6147-35f1-41b2a3be1c33@kernel.dk>
 <CA+icZUUfxAc9LaWSzSNV4tidW2KFeVLkDhU30OWbQP-=2bYFHw@mail.gmail.com>
 <b24101f1-c468-8f6b-9dcb-6dc59d0cd4b9@kernel.dk>
Message-ID: <455dd2c1-7346-2d43-4266-1367c368cee1@kernel.dk>
Date:   Mon, 1 Jun 2020 08:35:01 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b24101f1-c468-8f6b-9dcb-6dc59d0cd4b9@kernel.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 6/1/20 8:14 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/1/20 8:13 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 4:04 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 6/1/20 7:35 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>>> Hi Jens,
>>>>
>>>> with Linux v5.7 final I switched to linux-block.git/for-next and reverted...
>>>>
>>>> "block: read-ahead submission should imply no-wait as well"
>>>>
>>>> ...and see no boot-slowdowns.
>>>
>>> Can you try with these patches applied instead? Or pull my async-readahead
>>> branch from the same location.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I can do that.
>> I pulled from linux-block.git#async-readahead and will report later.
>>
>> Any specific testing desired by you?
> 
> Just do your boot timing test and see if it works, thanks.

Actually, can you just re-test with the current async-buffered.6 branch?
I think the major surgery should wait for 5.9, we can do this a bit
easier without having to touch everything around us.

-- 
Jens Axboe