Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp988269ybg; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 21:14:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxIXXO3rCdSxTBa680zrt7qoRjGd1JbY0vUkdEepGFx80JRd7JOBP0yb/UUuwFXv2zWGjKP X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ac3:: with SMTP id z3mr15356061ejf.311.1591071278479; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 21:14:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591071278; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vZtMLT26M5zZuRrGtDfrS6B4q334wFY+msPb3XQ3B1rS9+yUSEAuf0YBOpbHVSNa9e ATavCnFPDYdS1vFBLEqFOM8mg0cVhuf3oMwIOecZ3yBYIldM4WNvNlfZq5AI/NjNS7k1 fS0c11NK2/VeAkHuNUAUnfnXRzhP61nywv+uLvDsqmiRUlAZUjZ8KisZMShookzHj+kZ a0rFycLEI3O9iciwCD0CG4vQvkfgI5g3FGCMcq0wSl+Y2VfZDWWrYi4twGHN6K8nicz+ Txdzhk/FxQL/ZqiRuXw68I6Lz95z/O1LNtJmreYL4aHvogWU9tyZXr1eRM3b63aV5w/y mqIA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:dkim-signature; bh=ayiLISqhpukWIeWMrDjPyoahGbwH5C6Y31y3ZuKK5gg=; b=vwJRBGKHS38zPPaxfTo9xNr5rViGhgOhLSDMz/50ALdtqqFPNWbOt8mPM4smoZ8Il+ eJfPHJN6zEFePku4bTXMH7eEJLnTAO0TzD/O/uqwOESkvYHGu+ZJOKx84FQUsDpvoky8 C1CNgbj+pRXl1p8yv6SAJOwd8g9Wi5cLxQgOlT92hWvaWFFNT32qxB5exrul+ZPO2AEz Hp/bNy4KbfFxatQ+ffJrZFsqMQj+2XOOeyCeTtyGOQ00PI577B0bOp5quRldCV31mBRa WsP1TnKdxLrXufxqv4v4I7hz4QFzR+FCynunNBbkipw/KdhIcbNjjDgQObwZg9CVNpzM hedw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=XypMuqDU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dd21si736984edb.472.2020.06.01.21.14.15; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 21:14:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=XypMuqDU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725919AbgFBEM1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 2 Jun 2020 00:12:27 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:38508 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725616AbgFBEM0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2020 00:12:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1591071144; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ayiLISqhpukWIeWMrDjPyoahGbwH5C6Y31y3ZuKK5gg=; b=XypMuqDU4zIHecDeVpoOBiuIcCrXK9cPLz5rK20VGBNm4Q9YgcdjGP0wmqIpPDZ5OecNco EExpo6FS/xQBqJrtcOn8UaoeilWdEll0Ju2BaKyQ0APf9837spI6L6GAeYreyGRGxJt/Oj 08xjn/gsg9Xzqi6PLYUcwyYxxQLIRGI= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-295-ZTaONuorN-e4dtOkbW-DXg-1; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 00:12:21 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ZTaONuorN-e4dtOkbW-DXg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A41F7461; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 04:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x1.home (ovpn-112-195.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.195]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382F7D021C; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 04:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 22:12:18 -0600 From: Alex Williamson To: Diana Craciun Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com, bharatb.linux@gmail.com, Bharat Bhushan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] vfio/fsl-mc: Scan DPRC objects on vfio-fsl-mc driver bind Message-ID: <20200601221218.5527d3b7@x1.home> In-Reply-To: <20200508072039.18146-3-diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com> References: <20200508072039.18146-1-diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com> <20200508072039.18146-3-diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com> Organization: Red Hat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 8 May 2020 10:20:32 +0300 Diana Craciun wrote: > The DPRC (Data Path Resource Container) device is a bus device and has > child devices attached to it. When the vfio-fsl-mc driver is probed > the DPRC is scanned and the child devices discovered and initialized. > > Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan > Signed-off-by: Diana Craciun > --- > drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 107 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c > index 8b53c2a25b32..ea301ba81225 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c > +++ b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c > @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ > > #include "vfio_fsl_mc_private.h" > > +static struct fsl_mc_driver vfio_fsl_mc_driver; > + > static int vfio_fsl_mc_open(void *device_data) > { > if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE)) > @@ -84,6 +86,69 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_fsl_mc_ops = { > .mmap = vfio_fsl_mc_mmap, > }; > > +static int vfio_fsl_mc_bus_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, > + unsigned long action, void *data) > +{ > + struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev = container_of(nb, > + struct vfio_fsl_mc_device, nb); > + struct device *dev = data; > + struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev = to_fsl_mc_device(dev); > + struct fsl_mc_device *mc_cont = to_fsl_mc_device(mc_dev->dev.parent); > + > + if (action == BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE && > + vdev->mc_dev == mc_cont) { > + mc_dev->driver_override = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s", > + vfio_fsl_mc_ops.name); > + dev_info(dev, "Setting driver override for device in dprc %s\n", > + dev_name(&mc_cont->dev)); > + } else if (action == BUS_NOTIFY_BOUND_DRIVER && > + vdev->mc_dev == mc_cont) { > + struct fsl_mc_driver *mc_drv = to_fsl_mc_driver(dev->driver); > + > + if (mc_drv && mc_drv != &vfio_fsl_mc_driver) > + dev_warn(dev, "Object %s bound to driver %s while DPRC bound to vfio-fsl-mc\n", > + dev_name(dev), mc_drv->driver.name); > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int vfio_fsl_mc_init_device(struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev) > +{ > + struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev = vdev->mc_dev; > + int ret = 0; > + > + /* Non-dprc devices share mc_io from parent */ > + if (!is_fsl_mc_bus_dprc(mc_dev)) { > + struct fsl_mc_device *mc_cont = to_fsl_mc_device(mc_dev->dev.parent); > + > + mc_dev->mc_io = mc_cont->mc_io; > + return 0; > + } > + > + vdev->nb.notifier_call = vfio_fsl_mc_bus_notifier; > + ret = bus_register_notifier(&fsl_mc_bus_type, &vdev->nb); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + /* open DPRC, allocate a MC portal */ > + ret = dprc_setup(mc_dev); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(&mc_dev->dev, "Failed to setup DPRC (error = %d)\n", ret); > + bus_unregister_notifier(&fsl_mc_bus_type, &vdev->nb); > + return ret; > + } > + > + ret = dprc_scan_container(mc_dev, false); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(&mc_dev->dev, "Container scanning failed: %d\n", ret); > + bus_unregister_notifier(&fsl_mc_bus_type, &vdev->nb); > + dprc_cleanup(mc_dev); > + } > + > + return 0; The last error branch falls through, did you intend to return 'ret' here to capture that? Also, nit, ret doesn't need to be initialized. > +} > + > static int vfio_fsl_mc_probe(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev) > { > struct iommu_group *group; > @@ -112,9 +177,42 @@ static int vfio_fsl_mc_probe(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev) > return ret; > } > > + ret = vfio_fsl_mc_init_device(vdev); > + if (ret) { > + vfio_iommu_group_put(group, dev); > + return ret; > + } The error condition value is a bit inconsistent between vfio_fs_mc_init_device() and here, <0 vs !0. Thanks, Alex > + > return ret; > } > > +static int vfio_fsl_mc_device_remove(struct device *dev, void *data) > +{ > + struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev; > + > + WARN_ON(!dev); > + mc_dev = to_fsl_mc_device(dev); > + if (WARN_ON(!mc_dev)) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + kfree(mc_dev->driver_override); > + mc_dev->driver_override = NULL; > + > + /* > + * The device-specific remove callback will get invoked by device_del() > + */ > + device_del(&mc_dev->dev); > + put_device(&mc_dev->dev); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void vfio_fsl_mc_cleanup_dprc(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev) > +{ > + device_for_each_child(&mc_dev->dev, NULL, vfio_fsl_mc_device_remove); > + dprc_cleanup(mc_dev); > +} > + > static int vfio_fsl_mc_remove(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev) > { > struct vfio_fsl_mc_device *vdev; > @@ -124,6 +222,14 @@ static int vfio_fsl_mc_remove(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev) > if (!vdev) > return -EINVAL; > > + if (vdev->nb.notifier_call) > + bus_unregister_notifier(&fsl_mc_bus_type, &vdev->nb); > + > + if (is_fsl_mc_bus_dprc(mc_dev)) > + vfio_fsl_mc_cleanup_dprc(vdev->mc_dev); > + > + mc_dev->mc_io = NULL; > + > vfio_iommu_group_put(mc_dev->dev.iommu_group, dev); > > return 0; > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h > index e79cc116f6b8..37d61eaa58c8 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h > +++ b/drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc_private.h > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ > > struct vfio_fsl_mc_device { > struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev; > + struct notifier_block nb; > }; > > #endif /* VFIO_FSL_MC_PRIVATE_H */