Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon,  1 Jun 2020 22:42:16 -0700
Message-Id: <20200602054216.93122-1-davidgow@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: kunit: Add some troubleshooting tips to the FAQ
From:   David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
        alan.maguire@oracle.com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc:     linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Add an FAQ entry to the KUnit documentation with some tips for
troubleshooting KUnit and kunit_tool.

These suggestions largely came from an email thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/41db8bbd-3ba0-8bde-7352-083bf4b947ff@intel.com/T/#m23213d4e156db6d59b0b460a9014950f5ff6eb03

Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---
 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst
index ea55b2467653..40109d425988 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst
@@ -61,3 +61,35 @@ test, or an end-to-end test.
   kernel by installing a production configuration of the kernel on production
   hardware with a production userspace and then trying to exercise some behavior
   that depends on interactions between the hardware, the kernel, and userspace.
+
+KUnit isn't working, what should I do?
+======================================
+
+Unfortunately, there are a number of things which can break, but here are some
+things to try.
+
+1. Try running ``./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run`` with the ``--raw_output``
+   parameter. This might show details or error messages hidden by the kunit_tool
+   parser.
+2. Instead of running ``kunit.py run``, try running ``kunit.py config``,
+   ``kunit.py build``, and ``kunit.py exec`` independently. This can help track
+   down where an issue is occurring. (If you think the parser is at fault, you
+   can run it manually against stdin or a file with ``kunit.py parse``.)
+3. Running the UML kernel directly can often reveal issues or error messages
+   kunit_tool ignores. This should be as simple as running ``./vmlinux`` after
+   building the UML kernel (e.g., by using ``kunit.py build``). Note that UML
+   has some unusual requirements (such as the host having a tmpfs filesystem
+   mounted), and has had issues in the past when built statically and the host
+   has KASLR enabled. (On older host kernels, you may need to run ``setarch
+   `uname -m` -R ./vmlinux`` to disable KASLR.)
+4. Make sure the kernel .config has ``CONFIG_KUNIT=y`` and at least one test
+   (e.g. ``CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=y``). kunit_tool will keep its .config
+   around, so you can see what config was used after running ``kunit.py run``.
+   It also preserves any config changes you might make, so you can
+   enable/disable things with ``make ARCH=um menuconfig`` or similar, and then
+   re-run kunit_tool.
+5. Finally, running ``make ARCH=um defconfig`` before running ``kunit.py run``
+   may help clean up any residual config items which could be causing problems.
+
+If none of the above tricks help, you are always welcome to email any issues to
+kunit-dev@googlegroups.com.
-- 
2.27.0.rc2.251.g90737beb825-goog