Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 04:38:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 04:38:04 -0400 Received: from relay.planetinternet.be ([194.119.232.24]:23056 "EHLO relay.planetinternet.be") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 04:37:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 10:38:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Dirk Moerenhout X-X-Sender: To: J Sloan cc: Subject: Re: More memory == better? In-Reply-To: <3BD5E2C5.26F5A133@lexus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, J Sloan wrote: > If you don't enable highmem support, you'll > be able to use about 960 MB of your 1 GB - > no big loss, right? Actually if you wish you can use your full 1GB just fine without HIGHMEM: In /proc/meminfo: MemTotal: 1025360 kB LowTotal: 1025360 kB At boot: kernel: On node 0 totalpages: 262128 kernel: zone(0): 4096 pages. kernel: zone(1): 258032 pages. kernel: zone(2): 0 pages. The related config parameters: CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM=y # CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G is not set # CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set # CONFIG_1GB is not set CONFIG_2GB=y # CONFIG_3GB is not set For what I know this trick just limits you on the amount of swap you can have. The suggestion came from Ingo Molnar and it works fine for me. Dirk Moerenhout ///// System Administrator ///// Planet Internet NV - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/