Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp1515465ybg; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:05:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwPcWZqGwrrYwtUYcWIyRqpgvnoFpvSZxY7pNKKO9TVH85jrUraep/RrUy4yCePxu2H7aLo X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:415a:: with SMTP id l26mr25327425ejk.291.1591124748648; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 12:05:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591124748; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GRsScbiSkgG81PeQx76mEawp8l5mVdQNpXkYwKeOhHHGz8VVaH/TWlyZZQ7ZgZG/en tjw3geAp1S0gcW/fb/ZjhTwh+BnpQ/m80UggxocVHZ2G1p0qs3+byCxn8Kn4JMnRcySn SshtDnlZYDqXM3C21EfUGwRctp9mheY+jSrbpkEvgWlru80SctayqaZjfukEQKKDpad0 N+FZfMdJrMJlR6ww1frN2/XQT74vpEanVO87JUtCnl/Uf+2YVYi7hvPv+dJE3ZIO11Uj IPwdohfHFe/VHBPR0vmm3bxIYhEGm8Mt03wDwoLQ+G5dP3KedHdUxDbsTSJGDv4QA+Tu NgyQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=fFO/ZFBoAs0VTOftof+nkagqVWT9PkOIpFZl0Bg1K5w=; b=0mvyW7bcGvUIaVLP0JMrlfSImosx0kYNnjHi4Eq9TDTXvXFIr4bo9CovI/UhSd7w5c nKchxvLHRBCj8ZdrwD92Gytddk5B3PInZh3YQtgSvGiZrpKBraPjvqIrVe7Mavu12VSv 04XI/gpvB7tAj9AbwSBVhAuE24hWquBXzRMstKUaN2G75JkfMT0nZkY/oPPdMveclqCK 8ZTXeWXComPLG4Qg6I60Q8F9nHvJT0IbFcFiqnUYMtM0oEL/nWjEdyLvKCP6sBICRGjq 9I7DgSNn15tx2tP2c5Au4+z/8HUnXnBTM/X/QCgMpEHkeKADowYnHgHFc5mR08TyzpN3 HMiw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=lpAsyLCf; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id vr3si1877761ejb.520.2020.06.02.12.05.24; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 12:05:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=lpAsyLCf; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727826AbgFBTC7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 2 Jun 2020 15:02:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45170 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726174AbgFBTC6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2020 15:02:58 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x541.google.com (mail-pg1-x541.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::541]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F10A3C08C5C1 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:02:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x541.google.com with SMTP id n23so213179pgb.12 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 12:02:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fFO/ZFBoAs0VTOftof+nkagqVWT9PkOIpFZl0Bg1K5w=; b=lpAsyLCfUvO6w24tM0qNV3o7cer+7Ex1wYieVx5Ns0l8YnXXeB4P2kkP3u/LwPcjEF JRCrOBYiyVcAlEzAO6fAso1LRjrCRplmegkq9doL4wgPnjb6vcYQ0pQ0szE42oi2ORwB Xk0S1ymPbOaTqPDlHBTMxJMFfmc+Xz3h7m4aAqlCS54KUqeJ7uMHXgHR4Vgi6pOeI/sw PTD8CcDIleNQW/EMpL3Tizg1Rzf92f8CfW9ertULfU0WceWc+03cH//WNtCHnnoIN2kb lzgKTQnrMJTfe+fUN6Jt0rsqfLh+nptoKj2LlzJs1lvKPuAc4Y/etttmaz/G6vZCYqx5 uSoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fFO/ZFBoAs0VTOftof+nkagqVWT9PkOIpFZl0Bg1K5w=; b=iyNzcxPlVbjlmunt5VdgXHqCOaWu0ZbpH01ZG4joJgD2lBUVTCYGqUlDFMByNcuH7y Q68apVErjJLN8+NH5bqOIyTCmrgRlSHJw44vyvasasSlOeNJ+cgLgqKJcZKqE8d4/cFf u0cKKIxkNJkMFlpVjMXD7BH3jMmdbDHfrxl+V69S/7X3bMDBzOxQFnGeYxQDNUsGlM9G hrTNSKMT7qFnVNuXcmVq32L7oEZ3s3J7QC5ff70NzipgFt9k/aXdy2//ll7V7LB1wUQI 2gSu3AW2nOxaAJf0wUXENFDx/f4PvcQ/EsSOB5D0zPUpkxlduZ8a/knpA61kVE1vJ2yx sgXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531sLETuGxQ3T/LzQfLlTwn7f0K+q+wbJc5Xo6mq/fJPBGZlQRfh 8WYRzZ9uM4OgneniWb4OcGzdxA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:96ef:: with SMTP id i15mr24202428pfq.312.1591124577392; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 12:02:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.188] ([66.219.217.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q16sm2917805pfg.49.2020.06.02.12.02.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Jun 2020 12:02:56 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the rdma tree To: Jason Gunthorpe , Max Gurtovoy Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Doug Ledford , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Yamin Friedman , Israel Rukshin , Christoph Hellwig References: <20200602125647.5f5ed151@canb.auug.org.au> <3717aca8-9d75-33f1-ea8c-044af767ab5c@mellanox.com> <20200602190153.GA65026@mellanox.com> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <8be03d71-9c72-bf88-7fd7-76ec7700474a@kernel.dk> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 13:02:55 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200602190153.GA65026@mellanox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/2/20 1:01 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 11:37:26AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote: >> >> On 6/2/2020 5:56 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >> >> Hi, >> >> This looks good to me. >> >> Can you share a pointer to the tree so we'll test it in our labs ? >> >> need to re-test: >> >> 1. srq per core >> >> 2. srq per core + T10-PI >> >> And both will run with shared CQ. > > Max, this is too much conflict to send to Linus between your own > patches. I am going to drop the nvme part of this from RDMA. > > Normally I don't like applying partial series, but due to this tree > split, you can send the rebased nvme part through the nvme/block tree > at rc1 in two weeks.. Was going to comment that this is probably how it should have been done to begin with. If we have multiple conflicts like that between two trees, someone is doing something wrong... -- Jens Axboe