Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp1574805ybg; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 13:50:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyTywOOhnWKrs+3E/L1AZq/hrpmPVDAVmrgrluwbW7ZsJzqW8x+CmvJvKEXFwN/v8mVZNyO X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5602:: with SMTP id f2mr4181098ejq.381.1591131035701; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 13:50:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591131035; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WhZv9BBqMAOkhNeE+AWBmXK9AX4isKR+cK7151JBjeeiMZqCsUDEeu0PqsMOvCePLt AusL4oj/BO4q9INtYdidwIlr/4CTy42jHMbeT7Dl0FVOXBSt8jsdSSr58sPlJ83jHaod PR7O1Y0lZM63EPzdJ+fXXdh+xryj0xY2GWetO2k+eAyrx054dlB4yXWHFnCO7ubeKqFv tLhaBKs94VI0J2z+Zh8jGH1raF/hZ2sjkPU7zj5xIN/0ks2KdfPQGllyseGq/VhppgJQ FkROxIm1l/NpKpgwn9eK8CfORMhPjQezb7GUSl2Tg1VagE+HSSBhNxiWLJrUYS090hqj runA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Ft29W8Nvi0tl0Om9V4xLGJtcn+mwjihUuQtoWB0VLqc=; b=LHA+7xRw9DseH58l2S3Uo9SQBypnOG9VF/CnkbGZWQOe/se7Z0IX2QWdcoPoXp1e4w g+EdE4Mahzo2IIuzzYqd4IuOQlxmtNauXtk8Tv0TY3k+JIoUx/GNWYIcgasSkrX/VABA XagzBSH7KYCedqNYm2UwCgDgJubFrc6SuG29aBHi2MZvbZXmDplP/v4Gnrp5UN1hfh5Q u7vQB2/XPJCwbAQVzL0ghsmRIBp310K6cXl54V3rjLGMawMzDcWXr+HfqbWx0sv3c1x8 ZMvTZ4uf/Tt2PLMsOhwksTKdZYrVv7HAAusSmX4tLu4pCd+8kTmxAhNMC5MO/K8y3yvq qI5A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=Ah7vSqvm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b101si2101767edf.579.2020.06.02.13.50.12; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 13:50:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=Ah7vSqvm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727011AbgFBUsW (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:48:22 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55372 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726130AbgFBUsW (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:48:22 -0400 Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (50-39-105-78.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [50.39.105.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8794D20674; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 20:48:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591130901; bh=CdMKjWZXehyY4K7bRGCQXjkB0K8fL+v9jQ3qjY5zkYs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ah7vSqvm+xeoRajRYcKV6V6ne3nEgYVQGxwEECvLL2CLbgIvuxrJMVi4ZECDn4ALP UIcmVx8l92wOM6Eg8vcSWlwlflzFMb1032LApF+moh80ZENTYczhcZimKF02yuDnjR Ia2Edig6Qs2LfQJ2+2ItFdPZ8CBz+cFUkPfejAx8= Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6968E3522C92; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 13:48:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 13:48:21 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Marco Elver Cc: kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] kcsan: Prefer '__no_kcsan inline' in test Message-ID: <20200602204821.GI29598@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org References: <20200602143633.104439-1-elver@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200602143633.104439-1-elver@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 04:36:33PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > Instead of __no_kcsan_or_inline, prefer '__no_kcsan inline' in test -- > this is in case we decide to remove __no_kcsan_or_inline. > > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver > --- > > Hi Paul, > > This is to prepare eventual removal of __no_kcsan_or_inline, and avoid a > series that doesn't apply to anything other than -next (because some > bits are in -tip and the test only in -rcu; although this problem might > be solved in 2 weeks). This patch is to make sure in case the > __kcsan_or_inline series is based on -tip, integration in -next doesn't > cause problems. > > This came up in > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200529185923.GO706495@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Applied and pushed, thank you! Please note that unless you would like this pushed into the current merge window, it will not be visible in -next until v5.8-rc1 comes out. Which sounds like you are aware of already, just want to be sure. ;-) Thanx, Paul > Thanks, > -- Marco > > --- > kernel/kcsan/kcsan-test.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/kcsan-test.c b/kernel/kcsan/kcsan-test.c > index a8c11506dd2a..3af420ad6ee7 100644 > --- a/kernel/kcsan/kcsan-test.c > +++ b/kernel/kcsan/kcsan-test.c > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static struct { > }; > > /* Setup test checking loop. */ > -static __no_kcsan_or_inline void > +static __no_kcsan inline void > begin_test_checks(void (*func1)(void), void (*func2)(void)) > { > kcsan_disable_current(); > @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ begin_test_checks(void (*func1)(void), void (*func2)(void)) > } > > /* End test checking loop. */ > -static __no_kcsan_or_inline bool > +static __no_kcsan inline bool > end_test_checks(bool stop) > { > if (!stop && time_before(jiffies, end_time)) { > -- > 2.27.0.rc2.251.g90737beb825-goog >