Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp601342ybg; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 08:49:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXmEm+svG84Vh13z5ExIebDoaaeGID2rXdyXKAvzvwTQB88Ini5Iz3EUeNs4BN567e+IPv X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9495:: with SMTP id dm21mr27678264ejc.357.1591199398681; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 08:49:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591199398; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SwwHBnJWkP00PZ0QTqXPBgzoG+wa1UibXBIk8WhgAy4qtKSqP2dxSmdPa8yZuMmXk/ nU5d89oEw7TMRUSgBY64nVpAy5wlN8u/qMONzszz9CfFXATYvUWAodPOq/VIc6kclgkL 03eZbjuS1uMUMCDVIvjiOrcfyxt+2jS/ArC/9z8nVLmahRVXLlM0rztAznWyjR6olVId /eze+H4bRv/3+j2JbupX0NScwqdpRMpnxjMk76EEHxveuiQ8yqluqU82miV9f1uK4pmE 8odwndlXZybERNeFLuaHgnYOXAnKOxsfc2ZFn5WEzm68m/5mfFAAx8jAXM5jAjDdZxjM nuJA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=E3oupYX/rNyZ63dIcsrqIUAm+i9/XTMb/8j2ld5gwns=; b=UBQiabRqn5UHMh921I371It71CfrJ2bB7BoM5Gxl1Wh34KH5YToyNew401Fcd1pHRP 1eLlUjh4YujGy5N44fAXwDaaPhavaY1CwjYPKRVZt3KInHviRz2a486ek/+bzqaoZxxZ dvFQUM1eJPzFeHo5FFgNg/dO8SKfqb0rP1FFnwxAN+ZlnAZ8dq4vpebb3VOLK5JewqM3 8eh6P61zMAAowJ7kr1eo/i32LIXbxELx1igfLhxugmURtggt+ZT8qAw2GpHVQwqHwyxB PZdwhxxRLCkaCxDyi3HZU3ZyNWXqUvYHqHjOwsu5635teMzlfO6DQ5YUjHJje2mxy0fp O8ww== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i61si1399332edc.105.2020.06.03.08.49.35; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 08:49:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726233AbgFCPpU (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 3 Jun 2020 11:45:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40068 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725884AbgFCPpU (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jun 2020 11:45:20 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A00AC08C5C0; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 08:45:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jgVZp-0003HG-N5; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 17:45:14 +0200 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2151F10108D; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 17:45:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Vincenzo Frascino , Juergen Gross , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: system time goes weird in kvm guest after host suspend/resume In-Reply-To: <87sgfcf96k.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> References: <875zcfoko9.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87r1v3lynm.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87sgfcf96k.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 17:45:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87pnagf912.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thomas Gleixner writes: > Miklos Szeredi writes: >> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 2:31 PM Miklos Szeredi wrote: >> >>> > Can you please describe the setup of this test? >>> > >>> > - Host kernel version >> >> 5.5.16-100.fc30.x86_64 >> >>> > - Guest kernel version >> >> 75caf310d16c ("Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew)") >> >>> > - Is the revert done on the host or guest or both? >> >> Guest. >> >>> > - Test flow is: >>> > >>> > Boot host, start guest, suspend host, resume host, guest is screwed >>> > >>> > correct? >>> >>> Yep. > > Of course this does not reproduce here. What kind of host is this > running on? Can you provide a full demsg of the host please from boot to > post resume? Plus /proc/cpuinfo please (one CPU is sufficient)