Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] ovl: fix null pointer dereference on null stack
 pointer on error return
To:     Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc:     Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
        overlayfs <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20200603154559.140418-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
 <CAOQ4uxhLW=MSk=RhUi51EdOticfk1i_pku6qjCp2QpwnpyL5sw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1edc291d-6e63-89d8-d48c-443908ddc0e8@canonical.com>
 <CAJfpegsyGmJYHJr8rmRTxScYGyNQ1ZdPMxprW1zoQmGhXg1wuA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Autocrypt: addr=colin.king@canonical.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=
 mQINBE6TJCgBEACo6nMNvy06zNKj5tiwDsXXS+LhT+LwtEsy9EnraKYXAf2xwazcICSjX06e
 fanlyhB0figzQO0n/tP7BcfMVNG7n1+DC71mSyRK1ZERcG1523ajvdZOxbBCTvTitYOy3bjs
 +LXKqeVMhK3mRvdTjjmVpWnWqJ1LL+Hn12ysDVVfkbtuIm2NoaSEC8Ae8LSSyCMecd22d9Pn
 LR4UeFgrWEkQsqROq6ZDJT9pBLGe1ZS0pVGhkRyBP9GP65oPev39SmfAx9R92SYJygCy0pPv
 BMWKvEZS/7bpetPNx6l2xu9UvwoeEbpzUvH26PHO3DDAv0ynJugPCoxlGPVf3zcfGQxy3oty
 dNTWkP6Wh3Q85m+AlifgKZudjZLrO6c+fAw/jFu1UMjNuyhgShtFU7NvEzL3RqzFf9O1qM2m
 uj83IeFQ1FZ65QAiCdTa3npz1vHc7N4uEQBUxyXgXfCI+A5yDnjHwzU0Y3RYS52TA3nfa08y
 LGPLTf5wyAREkFYou20vh5vRvPASoXx6auVf1MuxokDShVhxLpryBnlKCobs4voxN54BUO7m
 zuERXN8kadsxGFzItAyfKYzEiJrpUB1yhm78AecDyiPlMjl99xXk0zs9lcKriaByVUv/NsyJ
 FQj/kmdxox3XHi9K29kopFszm1tFiDwCFr/xumbZcMY17Yi2bQARAQABtCVDb2xpbiBLaW5n
 IDxjb2xpbi5raW5nQGNhbm9uaWNhbC5jb20+iQI2BBMBCAAhBQJOkyQoAhsDBQsJCAcDBRUK
 CQgLBRYCAwEAAh4BAheAAAoJEGjCh9/GqAImsBcP9i6C/qLewfi7iVcOwqF9avfGzOPf7CVr
 n8CayQnlWQPchmGKk6W2qgnWI2YLIkADh53TS0VeSQ7Tetj8f1gV75eP0Sr/oT/9ovn38QZ2
 vN8hpZp0GxOUrzkvvPjpH+zdmKSaUsHGp8idfPpZX7XeBO0yojAs669+3BrnBcU5wW45SjSV
 nfmVj1ZZj3/yBunb+hgNH1QRcm8ZPICpjvSsGFClTdB4xu2AR28eMiL/TTg9k8Gt72mOvhf0
 fS0/BUwcP8qp1TdgOFyiYpI8CGyzbfwwuGANPSupGaqtIRVf+/KaOdYUM3dx/wFozZb93Kws
 gXR4z6tyvYCkEg3x0Xl9BoUUyn9Jp5e6FOph2t7TgUvv9dgQOsZ+V9jFJplMhN1HPhuSnkvP
 5/PrX8hNOIYuT/o1AC7K5KXQmr6hkkxasjx16PnCPLpbCF5pFwcXc907eQ4+b/42k+7E3fDA
 Erm9blEPINtt2yG2UeqEkL+qoebjFJxY9d4r8PFbEUWMT+t3+dmhr/62NfZxrB0nTHxDVIia
 u8xM+23iDRsymnI1w0R78yaa0Eea3+f79QsoRW27Kvu191cU7QdW1eZm05wO8QUvdFagVVdW
 Zg2DE63Fiin1AkGpaeZG9Dw8HL3pJAJiDe0KOpuq9lndHoGHs3MSa3iyQqpQKzxM6sBXWGfk
 EkK5Ag0ETpMkKAEQAMX6HP5zSoXRHnwPCIzwz8+inMW7mJ60GmXSNTOCVoqExkopbuUCvinN
 4Tg+AnhnBB3R1KTHreFGoz3rcV7fmJeut6CWnBnGBtsaW5Emmh6gZbO5SlcTpl7QDacgIUuT
 v1pgewVHCcrKiX0zQDJkcK8FeLUcB2PXuJd6sJg39kgsPlI7R0OJCXnvT/VGnd3XPSXXoO4K
 cr5fcjsZPxn0HdYCvooJGI/Qau+imPHCSPhnX3WY/9q5/WqlY9cQA8tUC+7mgzt2VMjFft1h
 rp/CVybW6htm+a1d4MS4cndORsWBEetnC6HnQYwuC4bVCOEg9eXMTv88FCzOHnMbE+PxxHzW
 3Gzor/QYZGcis+EIiU6hNTwv4F6fFkXfW6611JwfDUQCAHoCxF3B13xr0BH5d2EcbNB6XyQb
 IGngwDvnTyKHQv34wE+4KtKxxyPBX36Z+xOzOttmiwiFWkFp4c2tQymHAV70dsZTBB5Lq06v
 6nJs601Qd6InlpTc2mjd5mRZUZ48/Y7i+vyuNVDXFkwhYDXzFRotO9VJqtXv8iqMtvS4xPPo
 2DtJx6qOyDE7gnfmk84IbyDLzlOZ3k0p7jorXEaw0bbPN9dDpw2Sh9TJAUZVssK119DJZXv5
 2BSc6c+GtMqkV8nmWdakunN7Qt/JbTcKlbH3HjIyXBy8gXDaEto5ABEBAAGJAh8EGAEIAAkF
 Ak6TJCgCGwwACgkQaMKH38aoAiZ4lg/+N2mkx5vsBmcsZVd3ys3sIsG18w6RcJZo5SGMxEBj
 t1UgyIXWI9lzpKCKIxKx0bskmEyMy4tPEDSRfZno/T7p1mU7hsM4owi/ic0aGBKP025Iok9G
 LKJcooP/A2c9dUV0FmygecRcbIAUaeJ27gotQkiJKbi0cl2gyTRlolKbC3R23K24LUhYfx4h
 pWj8CHoXEJrOdHO8Y0XH7059xzv5oxnXl2SD1dqA66INnX+vpW4TD2i+eQNPgfkECzKzGj+r
 KRfhdDZFBJj8/e131Y0t5cu+3Vok1FzBwgQqBnkA7dhBsQm3V0R8JTtMAqJGmyOcL+JCJAca
 3Yi81yLyhmYzcRASLvJmoPTsDp2kZOdGr05Dt8aGPRJL33Jm+igfd8EgcDYtG6+F8MCBOult
 TTAu+QAijRPZv1KhEJXwUSke9HZvzo1tNTlY3h6plBsBufELu0mnqQvHZmfa5Ay99dF+dL1H
 WNp62+mTeHsX6v9EACH4S+Cw9Q1qJElFEu9/1vFNBmGY2vDv14gU2xEiS2eIvKiYl/b5Y85Q
 QLOHWV8up73KK5Qq/6bm4BqVd1rKGI9un8kezUQNGBKre2KKs6wquH8oynDP/baoYxEGMXBg
 GF/qjOC6OY+U7kNUW3N/A7J3M2VdOTLu3hVTzJMZdlMmmsg74azvZDV75dUigqXcwjE=
Message-ID: <78e9b4ed-f530-1fd0-07a2-aca5245a6bd8@canonical.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jun 2020 10:27:38 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegsyGmJYHJr8rmRTxScYGyNQ1ZdPMxprW1zoQmGhXg1wuA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 04/06/2020 08:25, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:15 PM Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 03/06/2020 17:11, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:46 PM Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>>>
>>>> There are two error return paths where the call to path_put is
>>>> dereferencing the null pointer 'stack'.  Fix this by avoiding the
>>>> error exit path via label 'out_err' that will lead to the path_put
>>>> calls and instead just return the error code directly.
>>>>
>>>> Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference after null check)"
>>>> Fixes: 4155c10a0309 ("ovl: clean up getting lower layers")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Which branch is that based on?
>>> Doesn't seem to apply to master nor next
>>
>> It was based on today's linux-next
> 
> Yeah, it's actually
> 
> Fixes: 73819e26c0f0 ("ovl: get rid of redundant members in struct ovl_fs")
> 
> So I'll just fold your patch.  There's still a change in the loop
> count for later errors, but that's okay, since
> ovl_lower_dir()/ovl_mount_dir_noesc() use the path_put_init() variant.
> Actually ovl_lower_dir() can get rid of that path_put_init()
> completely, since now the only caller will take care of that...
> 
> Thanks for reporting!
> 
> Miklos
> 
Is there a reason for folding the fix and hence losing the Signed-off-by
tag?

Colin