Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp1395785ybg; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 08:38:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyk8Z+yuQ9AOj0BGu37Pwjsad9kOxQ1nDqQC0HWFTCu4z4cpKyWnSaNwol34JDRp0x637YP X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:77c4:: with SMTP id m4mr4224302ejn.246.1591285118991; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 08:38:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591285118; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hZSxPHxIsbm36J1WlZh11gTZZ0+t2akbo4BXyu9HxgQ3FEuVUqaj9AiWZivqG7uDH9 4R08gmtS7kiZwXff0Nq8uGIm+I/Ty9o6o3OipQV8dzkSvVe577kHkYHblHXbgMyUl8tK UpoUqmBWR+ZZNcTPKgwQ4l8ONSkj1dGKS9xZpvFYvAiwUk9zfCchUPQ2y/jDYn9hub/u aaput5sgjQt+IKq3Wil2U/u0cNQNEqVU8kZ+zW1ZNOtQZ2tykAuhPKERU3nVKX/V/JL9 J3LRG4qM4z9I2ODFHZyzDPYzYISj8hkRL/6XXE8TS7uEdqZvNg3PgAwQ5q8K9Jp02WVj dzsw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=EkTe6msyKKBujkL/w9LaHM/UruPUqU2iBowLUPq5X2I=; b=VWSijcl42qqbp9WGI5Ftdy3A4Ew3JaLhcwQiRVZW9/oFumNmskY+aXxmhKGoVQHNIB u8Y4J7XRVJLHm6/LK9CtcqoQYE0HwFP6HNMF5WrIg0wOEeuFAQYtPlKC+1+XU8zJ2tUF QSlaC98TwoCv8yfVJlpNlIuoUlCw5/4WSx0C7qzTs/JQhlUvSxJhW1iIp0E06ti0Hcag 06F3h4eD+Y5LWUoeDUdyMfoMMysqUiW1DdhcWfr8zf3nZVavB1XbGEwTVQk0ppUTiGZi Fbbqq5j/0/WN6pwIm+qujQIvsGO4sCxPUllrqHyyEkRt/379Ljh3a2j2/NAVUT3M1BVv puTw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Jc6HTWdi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d5si1885100ejw.224.2020.06.04.08.38.15; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 08:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Jc6HTWdi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729565AbgFDPdd (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 4 Jun 2020 11:33:33 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:36513 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729035AbgFDPdc (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2020 11:33:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1591284810; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EkTe6msyKKBujkL/w9LaHM/UruPUqU2iBowLUPq5X2I=; b=Jc6HTWdiwzE/ayp56Kr0mS5XVW+WLZLBCHL0lE4HjkjHroyaPay8iKXOuPCMIG0gyWflJw 3GfQZ+FhFsuBLmST25tbaf9UCDkZ97LK6jVVql5NyXDu6kGC6/xbfEWbvhIQvZbVt1KNQi VWFVu0OtUJZML3U67MhX4Wg5syTc+mE= Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-40-j7gZDPm9NfOkkf6fxv4tQQ-1; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 11:33:28 -0400 X-MC-Unique: j7gZDPm9NfOkkf6fxv4tQQ-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id y9so2791647edr.22 for ; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 08:33:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=EkTe6msyKKBujkL/w9LaHM/UruPUqU2iBowLUPq5X2I=; b=tum4QcNEkuCF6UnQrIUYow0Y/GULFd/AP4bvt1ZDN/RF1hkqxfvBEYHYk7GjQt53wv +DOP74HCKAE4/ZdDoHwY6C4G54JYiqBV9hwDLENOLjuR2ua8vGMmauJZ4i2s4M8sbCxc EmsKHKmuwnQlbFBD5SIop89Y8S3nhvdeDW1ll1iKl0+Ro1Vyj7r0q+lCwXwO/jj03Flp gi2i/QM878Pdk+QQOiQrhh3brOcYXTGfhhcmlrdvlaGo+2hWhkezJK5DC9auul/hDdc1 ifFrXhVo6M3VpPV2z1doqvc3Biz+BM3igKldjkDKakaLKeV9YVUIc9RfGToBYvZJ4tJj 76Hw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53026+Qy6wtUPNtH+jEupXLOvSrBh70pu0Ws6J3jIUSNpk1ZuvdH 5+Yh6yp8YiAuTIisLP4R9/jMxIAK/TPF2Yl+BMNkrPg9m+EmeB6H4TWW+S6BxZsI5jHMn+edVGa zNrlX6doS0WnSlZAjpRMG6mYY X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:138b:: with SMTP id f11mr4304822ejc.288.1591284807151; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 08:33:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:138b:: with SMTP id f11mr4304812ejc.288.1591284806925; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 08:33:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vitty.brq.redhat.com (g-server-2.ign.cz. [91.219.240.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b24sm2638918edw.70.2020.06.04.08.33.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 04 Jun 2020 08:33:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Vitaly Kuznetsov To: Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Inject #GP when nested_vmx_get_vmptr() fails to read guest memory In-Reply-To: <20200604145357.GA30223@linux.intel.com> References: <20200604143158.484651-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20200604145357.GA30223@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 17:33:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87k10meth6.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sean Christopherson writes: > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 04:40:52PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 04/06/20 16:31, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > ... > >> > KVM could've handled the request correctly by going to userspace and >> > performing I/O but there doesn't seem to be a good need for such requests >> > in the first place. Sane guests should not call VMXON/VMPTRLD/VMCLEAR with >> > anything but normal memory. Just inject #GP to find insane ones. >> > ... >> >> looks good but we need to do the same in handle_vmread, handle_vmwrite, >> handle_invept and handle_invvpid. Which probably means adding something >> like nested_inject_emulation_fault to commonize the inner "if". > > Can we just kill the guest already instead of throwing more hacks at this > and hoping something sticks? We already have one in > kvm_write_guest_virt_system... > > commit 541ab2aeb28251bf7135c7961f3a6080eebcc705 > Author: Fuqian Huang > Date: Thu Sep 12 12:18:17 2019 +0800 > > KVM: x86: work around leak of uninitialized stack contents > Oh I see... [...] Let's get back to 'vm_bugged' idea then? https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/87muadnn1t.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com/ -- Vitaly