Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc:     Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@fossix.org>, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        "Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v9 4/5] ndctl/papr_scm,uapi: Add support for PAPR nvdimm specific methods
In-Reply-To: <20200603224612.GJ1505637@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
References: <20200602101438.73929-1-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> <20200602101438.73929-5-vaibhav@linux.ibm.com> <20200602205148.GF1505637@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <87tuzsggtd.fsf@linux.ibm.com> <20200603224612.GJ1505637@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 05 Jun 2020 00:12:13 +0530
Message-ID: <87eequhdve.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 11:41:42PM +0530, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
>> Hi Ira,
>> 
>> Thanks for reviewing this patch. My responses below:
>> 
>> Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> writes:
>> 
>
> ...
>
>> >> + *
>> >> + * Payload Version:
>> >> + *
>> >> + * A 'payload_version' field is present in PDSM header that indicates a specific
>> >> + * version of the structure present in PDSM Payload for a given PDSM command.
>> >> + * This provides backward compatibility in case the PDSM Payload structure
>> >> + * evolves and different structures are supported by 'papr_scm' and 'libndctl'.
>> >> + *
>> >> + * When sending a PDSM Payload to 'papr_scm', 'libndctl' should send the version
>> >> + * of the payload struct it supports via 'payload_version' field. The 'papr_scm'
>> >> + * module when servicing the PDSM envelope checks the 'payload_version' and then
>> >> + * uses 'payload struct version' == MIN('payload_version field',
>> >> + * 'max payload-struct-version supported by papr_scm') to service the PDSM.
>> >> + * After servicing the PDSM, 'papr_scm' put the negotiated version of payload
>> >> + * struct in returned 'payload_version' field.
>> >> + *
>> >> + * Libndctl on receiving the envelope back from papr_scm again checks the
>> >> + * 'payload_version' field and based on it use the appropriate version dsm
>> >> + * struct to parse the results.
>> >> + *
>> >> + * Backward Compatibility:
>> >> + *
>> >> + * Above scheme of exchanging different versioned PDSM struct between libndctl
>> >> + * and papr_scm should provide backward compatibility until following two
>> >> + * assumptions/conditions when defining new PDSM structs hold:
>> >> + *
>> >> + * Let T(X) = { set of attributes in PDSM struct 'T' versioned X }
>> >> + *
>> >> + * 1. T(X) is a proper subset of T(Y) if Y > X.
>> >> + *    i.e Each new version of PDSM struct should retain existing struct
>> >> + *    attributes from previous version
>> >> + *
>> >> + * 2. If an entity (libndctl or papr_scm) supports a PDSM struct T(X) then
>> >> + *    it should also support T(1), T(2)...T(X - 1).
>> >> + *    i.e When adding support for new version of a PDSM struct, libndctl
>> >> + *    and papr_scm should retain support of the existing PDSM struct
>> >> + *    version they support.
>> >
>> > Please see this thread for an example why versions are a bad idea in UAPIs:
>> >
>> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/26/213
>> >
>> 
>> > While the use of version is different in that thread the fundamental issues are
>> > the same.  You end up with some weird matrix of supported features and
>> > structure definitions.  For example, you are opening up the possibility of
>> > changing structures with a different version for no good reason.
>> 
>> Not really sure I understand the statement correctly "you are opening up
>> the possibility of changing structures with a different version for no
>> good reason."
>
[..]
> What I mean is:
>
> struct v1 {
> 	u32 x;
> 	u32 y;
> };
>
> struct v2 {
> 	u32 y;
> 	u32 x;
> };
>
> x and y are the same data but you have now redefined the order of the struct.
> You don't need that flexibility/complexity.
>
> Generally I think you are defining:
>
> struct v1 {
> 	u32 x;
> 	u32 y;
> };
>
> struct v2 {
> 	u32 x;
> 	u32 y;
> 	u32 z;
> 	u32 a;
> };
>
> Which becomes 2 structures...  There is no need.
>
> The easiest thing to do is:
>
> struct user_data {
> 	u32 x;
> 	u32 y;
> };
>
> And later you modify user_data to:
>
> struct user_data {
> 	u32 x;
> 	u32 y;
> 	u32 z;
> 	u32 a;
> };
>
> libndctl always passes sizeof(struct user_data) to the call. [Do ensure
> structures are 64bit aligned for this to work.]
>
> The kernel sees the size and returns the amount of data up to that size.
>
> Therefore, older kernels automatically fill in x and y,  newer kernels fill in
> z/a if the buffer was big enough.  libndctl only uses the fields it knows about.
>
> It is _much_ easier this way.  Almost nothing needs to get changed as versions
> roll forward.  The only big issue is if libndctl _needs_ z then it has to check
> if z is returned.
>
> In that case add a cap_mask with bit fields which the kernel can fill in for
> which fields are valid.
>
> struct user_data {
> 	u64 cap_mask;  /* where bits define extra future capabilities */
> 	u32 x;
> 	u32 y;
> };
>
> IFF you need to add data within fields which are reserved you can use
> capability flags to indicate which fields are requested and which are returned
> by the kernel.
>
> But I _think_ for what you want libndctl must survive if z/a are not available
> right?  So just adding to the structure should be fine.
Agreed. But as I mentioned in my response to Dan's review comments [1], we
will be removing the version field altogether and instead will introduce
new psdm requests bound to new struct definitions in conjuntion to
nvdimm-flags. I have a patchset ready which I will be sending out soon.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvdimm/87h7vrgpzx.fsf@linux.ibm.com/
>
>> We want to return more data in the struct in future iterations. So
>> 'changing structure with different version' is something we are
>> expecting. 
>> 
>> With the backward compatibility constraints 1 & 2 above, it will ensure
>> that support matrix looks like a lower traingular matrix with each
>> successive version supporting previous version attributes. So supporting
>> future versions is relatively simplified.
>
> But you end up with weird switch/if's etc to deal with the multiple structures.
>
> With the size method the kernel simply returns the same size data as the user
> requested and everything is done.  No logic required at all.  Literally it can
> just copy the data it has (truncating if necessary).
>
Agreed. But with version field gone now we will instead use new psdm
requests bound to new struct definitions in conjuntion to nvdimm-flags
to retrive extended data from papr_scm.

>> 
>> >
>> > Also having the user query with version Z and get back version X (older) is
>> > odd.  Generally if the kernel does not know about a feature (ie version Z of
>> > the structure) it should return -EINVAL and let the user figure out what to do.
>> > The user may just give up or they could try a different query.
>> >
>> Considering the flow of ndctl/libndctl this is needed. libndctl will
>> usually issues only one CMD_CALL ioctl to kernel and if that fails then
>> an error is reported and ndctl will exit loosing state.
>> 
>> Adding mechanism in libndctl to reissue CMD_CALL ioctl to fetch a
>> appropriate version of pdsm struct is going to be considerably more
>> work.
>> 
>> This version fall-back mechanism, ensures that libndctl will receive
>> usable data without having to reissue a more CMD_CALL ioctls.
>
> Define usable?
>
> What happens if libndctl does not get 'z' in my example above?  What does it
> do?  If I understand correctly it does not _need_ z.  So why have a check on
> the version from the kernel?
>
> What if we change to:
>
> struct v3 {
> 	u32 x;
> 	u32 y;
> 	u32 z;
> 	u32 a;
> 	u32 b;
> 	u32 c;
> };
>
> Now it has to
>
> 	if(version 2)
> 		z/a valid do something()
>
> 	if(version 3)
> 		b/c valid do something else()
>
> if z, a, b, c are all 0 does it matter?
>
> If not, the logic above disappears.
>
> If so, then you need a cap mask.  Then the kernel can say c and a are valid
> (but c is 0) or other flexible stuff like that.
>
>> 
>> >> + */
>> >> +
>> >> +/* PDSM-header + payload expected with ND_CMD_CALL ioctl from libnvdimm */
>> >> +struct nd_pdsm_cmd_pkg {
>> >> +	struct nd_cmd_pkg hdr;	/* Package header containing sub-cmd */
>> >> +	__s32 cmd_status;	/* Out: Sub-cmd status returned back */
>> >> +	__u16 reserved[5];	/* Ignored and to be used in future */
>> >
>> > How do you know when reserved is used for something else in the future?  Is
>> > reserved guaranteed (and checked by the code) to be 0?
>> 
>> For current set of pdsm requests ignore these reserved fields. However a
>> future pdsm request can leverage these reserved fields. So papr_scm
>> just bind the usage of these fields with the value of
>> 'nd_cmd_pkg.nd_command' that indicates the pdsm request.
>> 
>> That being said checking if the reserved fields are set to 0 will be a
>> good measure. Will add this check in next iteration.
>
> Exactly, if you don't check them now you will end up with an older libndctl
> which passes in garbage and breaks future users...  Basically rendering the
> reserved fields useless.
I have addressed this in my new patch-series which adds checks for
reserved fields to be '0'

>
>> 
>> >
>> >> +	__u16 payload_version;	/* In/Out: version of the payload */
>> >
>> > Why is payload_version after reserved?
>> Want to place the payload version field just before the payload data so
>> that it can be accessed with simple pointer arithmetic.
>
> I did not see that in the patch.  I thought you were using
> nd_pdsm_cmd_pkg->payload_version?
Thats right, but it just provided another simple way to retrive
payload_version without resorting to 'container_of' macro. Anyways the
version field is now gone hence 'payload' follows the reserved fields.

>
>> 
>> >
>> >> +	__u8 payload[];		/* In/Out: Sub-cmd data buffer */
>> >> +} __packed;
>> >> +
>> >> +/*
>> >> + * Methods to be embedded in ND_CMD_CALL request. These are sent to the kernel
>> >> + * via 'nd_pdsm_cmd_pkg.hdr.nd_command' member of the ioctl struct
>> >> + */
>> >> +enum papr_pdsm {
>> >> +	PAPR_PDSM_MIN = 0x0,
>> >> +	PAPR_PDSM_MAX,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +/* Convert a libnvdimm nd_cmd_pkg to pdsm specific pkg */
>> >> +static inline struct nd_pdsm_cmd_pkg *nd_to_pdsm_cmd_pkg(struct nd_cmd_pkg *cmd)
>> >> +{
>> >> +	return (struct nd_pdsm_cmd_pkg *) cmd;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +/* Return the payload pointer for a given pcmd */
>> >> +static inline void *pdsm_cmd_to_payload(struct nd_pdsm_cmd_pkg *pcmd)
>> >> +{
>> >> +	if (pcmd->hdr.nd_size_in == 0 && pcmd->hdr.nd_size_out == 0)
>> >> +		return NULL;
>> >> +	else
>> >> +		return (void *)(pcmd->payload);
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +#endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PAPR_PDSM_H_ */
>> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
>> >> index 149431594839..5e2237e7ec08 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
>> >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
>> >> @@ -15,13 +15,15 @@
>> >>  #include <linux/seq_buf.h>
>> >>  
>> >>  #include <asm/plpar_wrappers.h>
>> >> +#include <asm/papr_pdsm.h>
>> >>  
>> >>  #define BIND_ANY_ADDR (~0ul)
>> >>  
>> >>  #define PAPR_SCM_DIMM_CMD_MASK \
>> >>  	((1ul << ND_CMD_GET_CONFIG_SIZE) | \
>> >>  	 (1ul << ND_CMD_GET_CONFIG_DATA) | \
>> >> -	 (1ul << ND_CMD_SET_CONFIG_DATA))
>> >> +	 (1ul << ND_CMD_SET_CONFIG_DATA) | \
>> >> +	 (1ul << ND_CMD_CALL))
>> >>  
>> >>  /* DIMM health bitmap bitmap indicators */
>> >>  /* SCM device is unable to persist memory contents */
>> >> @@ -350,16 +352,97 @@ static int papr_scm_meta_set(struct papr_scm_priv *p,
>> >>  	return 0;
>> >>  }
>> >>  
>> >> +/*
>> >> + * Validate the inputs args to dimm-control function and return '0' if valid.
>> >> + * This also does initial sanity validation to ND_CMD_CALL sub-command packages.
>> >> + */
>> >> +static int is_cmd_valid(struct nvdimm *nvdimm, unsigned int cmd, void *buf,
>> >> +		       unsigned int buf_len)
>> >> +{
>> >> +	unsigned long cmd_mask = PAPR_SCM_DIMM_CMD_MASK;
>> >> +	struct nd_pdsm_cmd_pkg *pkg = nd_to_pdsm_cmd_pkg(buf);
>> >> +	struct papr_scm_priv *p;
>> >> +
>> >> +	/* Only dimm-specific calls are supported atm */
>> >> +	if (!nvdimm)
>> >> +		return -EINVAL;
>> >> +
>> >> +	/* get the provider date from struct nvdimm */
>> >
>> > s/date/data
>> Thanks for point this out. Will fix this in next iteration.
>> 
>> >
>> >> +	p = nvdimm_provider_data(nvdimm);
>> >> +
>> >> +	if (!test_bit(cmd, &cmd_mask)) {
>> >> +		dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev, "Unsupported cmd=%u\n", cmd);
>> >> +		return -EINVAL;
>> >> +	} else if (cmd == ND_CMD_CALL) {
>> >> +
>> >> +		/* Verify the envelope package */
>> >> +		if (!buf || buf_len < sizeof(struct nd_pdsm_cmd_pkg)) {
>> >> +			dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev, "Invalid pkg size=%u\n",
>> >> +				buf_len);
>> >> +			return -EINVAL;
>> >> +		}
>> >> +
>> >> +		/* Verify that the PDSM family is valid */
>> >> +		if (pkg->hdr.nd_family != NVDIMM_FAMILY_PAPR) {
>> >> +			dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev, "Invalid pkg family=0x%llx\n",
>> >> +				pkg->hdr.nd_family);
>> >> +			return -EINVAL;
>> >> +
>> >> +		}
>> >> +
>> >> +		/* We except a payload with all PDSM commands */
>> >> +		if (pdsm_cmd_to_payload(pkg) == NULL) {
>> >> +			dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev,
>> >> +				"Empty payload for sub-command=0x%llx\n",
>> >> +				pkg->hdr.nd_command);
>> >> +			return -EINVAL;
>> >> +		}
>> >> +	}
>> >> +
>> >> +	/* Command looks valid */
>> >
>> > I assume the first command to be implemented also checks the { nd_command,
>> > payload_version, payload length } for correctness?
>> Yes the pdsm service functions do check the payload_version and
>> payload_length. Please see the papr_pdsm_health() that services the
>> PAPR_PDSM_HEALTH pdsm in Patch-5
>> 
>
> cool.
>
>> >
>> >> +	return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int papr_scm_service_pdsm(struct papr_scm_priv *p,
>> >> +				struct nd_pdsm_cmd_pkg *call_pkg)
>> >> +{
>> >> +	/* unknown subcommands return error in packages */
>> >> +	if (call_pkg->hdr.nd_command <= PAPR_PDSM_MIN ||
>> >> +	    call_pkg->hdr.nd_command >= PAPR_PDSM_MAX) {
>> >> +		dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev, "Invalid PDSM request 0x%llx\n",
>> >> +			call_pkg->hdr.nd_command);
>> >> +		call_pkg->cmd_status = -EINVAL;
>> >> +		return 0;
>> >> +	}
>> >> +
>> >> +	/* Depending on the DSM command call appropriate service routine */
>> >> +	switch (call_pkg->hdr.nd_command) {
>> >> +	default:
>> >> +		dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev, "Unsupported PDSM request 0x%llx\n",
>> >> +			call_pkg->hdr.nd_command);
>> >> +		call_pkg->cmd_status = -ENOENT;
>> >> +		return 0;
>> >> +	}
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >>  static int papr_scm_ndctl(struct nvdimm_bus_descriptor *nd_desc,
>> >>  			  struct nvdimm *nvdimm, unsigned int cmd, void *buf,
>> >>  			  unsigned int buf_len, int *cmd_rc)
>> >>  {
>> >>  	struct nd_cmd_get_config_size *get_size_hdr;
>> >>  	struct papr_scm_priv *p;
>> >> +	struct nd_pdsm_cmd_pkg *call_pkg = NULL;
>> >> +	int rc;
>> >>  
>> >> -	/* Only dimm-specific calls are supported atm */
>> >> -	if (!nvdimm)
>> >> -		return -EINVAL;
>> >> +	/* Use a local variable in case cmd_rc pointer is NULL */
>> >> +	if (cmd_rc == NULL)
>> >> +		cmd_rc = &rc;
>> >
>> > Why is this needed?  AFAICT The caller of papr_scm_ndctl does not specify null
>> > and you did not change it.
>> This pointer is coming from outside the papr_scm code hence need to be
>> defensive here. Also as per[1] cmd_rc is "translation of firmware status"
>> and not every caller would need it hence making this pointer optional.
>> 
>> This is evident in acpi_nfit_blk_get_flags() where the 'nd_desc->ndctl'
>> is called with 'cmd_rc == NULL'.
>> 
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvdimm/CAPcyv4hE_FG0YZXJVA1G=CBq8b9e0K54jxk5Sq5UKU-dnWT2Kg@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Ah... Ok.  So this is a bug fix which needs to happen regardless of the status
> of this patch...
>
>> 
>> >
>> >> +
>> >> +	*cmd_rc = is_cmd_valid(nvdimm, cmd, buf, buf_len);
>> >> +	if (*cmd_rc) {
>> >> +		pr_debug("Invalid cmd=0x%x. Err=%d\n", cmd, *cmd_rc);
>> >> +		return *cmd_rc;
>> >> +	}
>> >>  
>> >>  	p = nvdimm_provider_data(nvdimm);
>> >>  
>> >> @@ -381,13 +464,19 @@ static int papr_scm_ndctl(struct nvdimm_bus_descriptor *nd_desc,
>> >>  		*cmd_rc = papr_scm_meta_set(p, buf);
>
> ... Because this will break here. even without this new code...  right?
>
> Lets get this fix in as a prelim-patch.
Yes, I have moved the changes proposed in this hunk to a separate prelim
patch in the v10 of the patch series.

>
>> >>  		break;
>> >>  
>> >> +	case ND_CMD_CALL:
>> >> +		call_pkg = nd_to_pdsm_cmd_pkg(buf);
>> >> +		*cmd_rc = papr_scm_service_pdsm(p, call_pkg);
>> >> +		break;
>> >> +
>> >>  	default:
>> >> -		return -EINVAL;
>> >> +		dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev, "Unknown command = %d\n", cmd);
>> >> +		*cmd_rc = -EINVAL;
>> >
>> > Is this change related?  If there is a bug where there is a caller of
>> > papr_scm_ndctl() with cmd_rc == NULL this should be a separate patch to fix
>> > that issue.
>> This simplifies a bit debugging of errors reported in
>> papr_scm_ndctl() as it ensures that subsequest dev_dbg "Returned with
>> cmd_rc" is always logged.
>> 
>> I think, this is a too small change to be carved out as an independent
>> patch. Also this doesnt change the behaviour of the code except logging
>> some more error info.
>> 
>> However, If you feel too strongly about it I will spin a separate patch
>> in this patch series for this.
[..]
>
> This can go in as part of a 'protect against cmd_rc == NULL'
> preliminary patch.
Yes, have coalesced this change with changes I reffered to in
my previous comment into a single prelim patch.

[..]
>
> I flagged this because at first I could not figure out what this had to do with
> the ND_CMD_CALL...
>
> For reviewers you want to make your patches concise to what you are
> fixing/adding...
Sure. Will be more careful of this in future patches.

>
> Also, based on acpi_nfit_blk_get_flags() using cmd_rc == NULL it looks like we
> have a bug which needs to get fixed regardless of the this patch.  And if that
> bug exists in earlier kernels you will need a separate patch to backport as a
> fix.
>
> So lets get that in first and separate...  :-D
Sure, will send out a separate independent patch fixing the cmd_rc ==
NULL issue in acpi_nfit_blk_get_flags addressing it to stable tree.

>
> Ira
>
>> 
>> >
>> > Ira
>> >
>> >>  	}
>> >>  
>> >>  	dev_dbg(&p->pdev->dev, "returned with cmd_rc = %d\n", *cmd_rc);
>> >>  
>> >> -	return 0;
>> >> +	return *cmd_rc;
>> >>  }
>> >>  
>> >>  static ssize_t flags_show(struct device *dev,
>> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ndctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/ndctl.h
>> >> index de5d90212409..0e09dc5cec19 100644
>> >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/ndctl.h
>> >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ndctl.h
>> >> @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ struct nd_cmd_pkg {
>> >>  #define NVDIMM_FAMILY_HPE2 2
>> >>  #define NVDIMM_FAMILY_MSFT 3
>> >>  #define NVDIMM_FAMILY_HYPERV 4
>> >> +#define NVDIMM_FAMILY_PAPR 5
>> >>  
>> >>  #define ND_IOCTL_CALL			_IOWR(ND_IOCTL, ND_CMD_CALL,\
>> >>  					struct nd_cmd_pkg)
>> >> -- 
>> >> 2.26.2
>> >> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Cheers
>> ~ Vaibhav

-- 
Cheers
~ Vaibhav