Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: system time goes weird in kvm guest after host suspend/resume
To:     Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc:     kvm@vger.kernel.org, Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <87pnagf912.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <87367a91rn.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <CAJfpegvchB2H=NK3JU0BQS7h=kXyifgKD=JHjjT6vTYVMspY2A@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1a1c32fe-d124-0e47-c9e4-695be7ea7567@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jun 2020 22:14:11 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegvchB2H=NK3JU0BQS7h=kXyifgKD=JHjjT6vTYVMspY2A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 04/06/20 21:28, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> time(2) returns good time, while clock_gettime(2) returns bad time.
> Here's an example:
> 
> time=1591298725 RT=1591300383 MONO=39582 MONO_RAW=39582 BOOT=39582
> time=1591298726 RT=1591300383 MONO=39582 MONO_RAW=39582 BOOT=39582
> time=1591298727 RT=1591300383 MONO=39582 MONO_RAW=39582 BOOT=39582
> time=1591298728 RT=1591300383 MONO=39582 MONO_RAW=39582 BOOT=39582
> time=1591298729 RT=1591300383 MONO=39582 MONO_RAW=39582 BOOT=39582
> 
> As you can see, only time(2) is updated, the others remain the same.
> date(1) uses clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME) so that shows the bad date.
> 
> When the correct time reaches the value returned by CLOCK_REALTIME,
> the value jumps exactly 2199 seconds.

clockid_to_kclock(CLOCK_REALTIME) is &clock_realtime, so clock_gettime
calls ktime_get_real_ts64, which is:


        do {
                seq = read_seqcount_begin(&tk_core.seq);

                ts->tv_sec = tk->xtime_sec;
                nsecs = timekeeping_get_ns(&tk->tkr_mono);

        } while (read_seqcount_retry(&tk_core.seq, seq));

        ts->tv_nsec = 0;
        timespec64_add_ns(ts, nsecs);

time(2) instead should actually be gettimeofday(2), which just returns
tk->xtime_sec.  So the problem is the nanosecond part which is off by
2199*10^9 nanoseconds, and that is suspiciously close to 2^31...

Paolo