Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp1709146ybg; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 17:28:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwys8hkheMJy6Y+tUJHZysa1qIGGaDAH+uVcE07mHZxugzaHnBioAy9j7iVJy2URHrIw9MM X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c81a:: with SMTP id a26mr7002310edt.353.1591316891149; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 17:28:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591316891; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZuV4x0TwQUxq13PUK5SfEOyiKS0qBuGwuds2QgxMqWMGVLt3KBaPsgKE55e1QH3P1C roTAW+fzUN37cG82S8vJelpwzQhVVdo6vmBqBYnx6J0ikD0Zp+GECqZzaWCQAlX8rfBM phF9SCaBzqMOQVoLye3ZB8xqgNAzvQQjCeCXYCktNltGfx/7WT+jcP0bRey9Key+v3Gj P8ZV/H6iMWBXgwMicNCZDz/w1iifDkb4Yr/m7uLdoJc00KNJnnLDK6GAUShT7bHdS8cu E+YCM0g5t6k2v9RbSgncpzQ0aWfILL4REHn9CTTIRECwuoKg9K3MpEFdCQj9E97xBY+H s/Ig== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:dkim-signature; bh=zBC+3Rh493Pihk2TfJshByWqqAzGsz2M8F7u+obL4Tc=; b=vy6zi9xu+0ORicO6YqNGcss1fu+qBJWmL9t1Yh6vHoFbnTVDceXJf2FrE93fYotZnA 0idISOTwGHAa88eAHz0WgSbqQjUglG/jOe8xBYrI6lF9+jKEtuIm52mZOeff3QX5bnMA 6xMpZu4fao50xlf5w4cpp0g21rWXo5MCq4cV22d4v4a1PY/uiD0d8Kwzv5K40xgeoxsh 03B4RuYlenfVSYvBai3cLbVH85w3PQj3sg37QoWhUPeuP1F9Jec8Ut69IvRko/rbi5oV Gw5PaofTnTOQmaJsOrdiS63qQjtfNV3kOu5GmQ6g91lWAJoYsmRQCZ5/HdCzUiZIDcII uvog== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=OKS7TeTt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q14si2582311ejt.12.2020.06.04.17.27.48; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 17:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=OKS7TeTt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726088AbgFEAZx (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 4 Jun 2020 20:25:53 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:30719 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725955AbgFEAZw (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2020 20:25:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1591316751; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zBC+3Rh493Pihk2TfJshByWqqAzGsz2M8F7u+obL4Tc=; b=OKS7TeTtbRHd9l/908udv4Eef++VEm2rk8Bykn8uIfvWsDSYorX1cr84Sx/mphPsvI6xdf beOHpXqOly2p3yQAMi+sIv56fO9xCm++euDeqgbu+/JIqVGUWR2fSnG020FgWu6AXQXtvV hqyEK8i7P0r5c2CxgepdkCNLtZk8WYs= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-317-s0x6UcCjP9GH6n4q5rdQTA-1; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 20:25:49 -0400 X-MC-Unique: s0x6UcCjP9GH6n4q5rdQTA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ECC11854C46; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 00:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.36.110.3]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4099C5D9D3; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 00:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 02:25:41 +0200 From: Stefano Brivio To: Liu Yiding Cc: kernel test robot , Florian Westphal , Pablo Neira Ayuso , LKML , lkp@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [LKP] Re: [netfilter] e32a4dc651: BUG:using_smp_processor_id()in_preemptible Message-ID: <20200605022541.3d702fe1@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <7dd4f0d2-34a7-8086-99cb-424ff2e039ca@intel.com> References: <20200603084934.GF12456@shao2-debian> <20200605002323.501b1cc6@redhat.com> <7dd4f0d2-34a7-8086-99cb-424ff2e039ca@intel.com> Organization: Red Hat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 08:15:07 +0800 Liu Yiding wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On 6/5/20 6:23 AM, Stefano Brivio wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 16:49:34 +0800 > > kernel test robot wrote: > > =20 > >> Greeting, > >> > >> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7): > >> > >> commit: e32a4dc6512ce3c1a1920531246e7037896e510a ("netfilter: nf_table= s: make sets built-in") > >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master > >> > >> in testcase: kernel-selftests > >> with following parameters: > >> > >> group: kselftests-netfilter =20 > > I couldn't find this information in the report. Would it be possible to > > have here an indication of what kselftest specifically is failing? > > There are a number of tests in that group. I have an obvious suspicion > > here (nft_concat_range.sh), but it would be nice to know, in general. = =20 >=20 > Yes, it's nft_concat_range.sh caused this error. >=20 > ``` >=20 > [=C2=A0 165.249447] # selftests: netfilter: nft_concat_range.sh > [=C2=A0 165.249453] > [=C2=A0 165.295336] # TEST: reported issues > [=C2=A0 165.295342] > [=C2=A0 165.316525] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [0000000= 0]=20 > code: nft/6247 > [=C2=A0 165.319547] caller is nft_pipapo_insert+0x464/0x610 [nf_tables] > [=C2=A0 165.321846] CPU: 1 PID: 6247 Comm: nft Not tainted=20 > 5.6.0-rc5-01595-ge32a4dc6512ce3 #1 >=20 > ``` Thanks for confirming. I think it would really be helpful to have the specific test name in the report, in the future. > And i think this error is caused by some kconfigs. > > This test was passed until we enabled all kconfigs defined in=20 > netfilter/config. :-( Then most likely this was CONFIG_NF_TABLES_SET not enabled, which goes away with Florian's commit e32a4dc6512c as the whole feature is now built in. --=20 Stefano