Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp1833835ybg; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 21:51:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyfVX1msfJzywm4iGqhuvKDUEK7bICwU4xDKSD88hnoS7NhDoSklXIjJqs9VTlnY3cXt2LZ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:311c:: with SMTP id dc28mr7430239edb.184.1591332712599; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 21:51:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591332712; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WTdhcIHFthf5NP2tv7mWS/6oY/ZAtwxQOrJrPtTlHNLoVnwQD+RojSzMSVfa5p4i3Q HvMCKj3UJrniplatc0sH0MPZLPjCHJSicaoI1G/xRhvh/O/xw+npCE2wm8BI0Vg5+mey bNcF+/jJ22zRunYx3i/Tznwui8zlqoQVXA85ioDPVFPLpOEG1SqwiCP0IvO2B/wI/Suj svT/vfwdY+LjefKj/kz1q42vQ+pXegO7XeCG3WPVU7AfWAEbs5Ls1m6vI3NXYLv+UXUz 2zRqrZcRbeiDNMYpZkof8cP9Tk6p1DEOgP22YC+G1xtvq2tX+ohLfVhbxoN6pzC9cYgY qVkA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:content-transfer-encoding :content-id:mime-version:comments:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc :to:from; bh=pty71qlVlOTt0Hqn8bgnXFHhvHIe/WzzShrmWb+qBLY=; b=YnzC+txAyeI5ilIPm1cwR0I6V8d56KSyV0zfg9LkG9zPaxQfrc86G3cPMfXqv4ve5U erZokcuvVkPuz3juAu3j7QvMP65vxENMBoNyQ8Fx0gplqtaDSWIvUGPGe+BvMmo5/eB0 vtc8ttURrR7XMX64zLHyz+BtJdofzeEE8PBn/rAXTdCg7tPRVFTjYS6M9XiFoC4o85el wMm2OlVEiT8CVOYCikal7j+YIljiDlNyBdtWxlNp+3NabXerXGP95x/SmkGLlp6vSPxK 3UoaMOXF6tn/MYk4yuUt/vORCEXO1p7+r527KnxVRJbsbTm9CV7VtScQ5dkAgyRvV/WU 7L7A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z5si3130963edi.111.2020.06.04.21.51.29; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 21:51:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726114AbgFEErh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 5 Jun 2020 00:47:37 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:59018 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725280AbgFEErh (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2020 00:47:37 -0400 Received: from 1.general.jvosburgh.us.vpn ([10.172.68.206] helo=famine.localdomain) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jh4GM-0005KP-Mp; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 04:47:27 +0000 Received: by famine.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF8785FEE7; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 21:47:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from famine (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by famine.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88F59FB38; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 21:47:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Jay Vosburgh To: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ashok.raj@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI/ERR: Fix fatal error recovery for non-hotplug capable devices In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com message dated "Thu, 04 Jun 2020 14:50:01 -0700." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 27.0.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <25282.1591332444.1@famine> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 21:47:24 -0700 Message-ID: <25283.1591332444@famine> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com wrote: >From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan > >Fatal (DPC) error recovery is currently broken for non-hotplug >capable devices. With current implementation, after successful >fatal error recovery, non-hotplug capable device state won't be >restored properly. You can find related issues in following links. > >https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/27/290 >https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/12115.1588207324@famine/ >https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/28/328 > >Current fatal error recovery implementation relies on hotplug handler >for detaching/re-enumerating the affected devices/drivers on DLLSC >state changes. So when dealing with non-hotplug capable devices, >recovery code does not restore the state of the affected devices >correctly. Correct implementation should call report_slot_reset() >function after resetting the link to restore the state of the >device/driver. > >So use PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET as error status for successful >reset_link() operation and use PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT for failure >case. PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET error state will ensure slot_reset() >is called after reset link operation which will also fix the above >mentioned issue. > >[original patch is from jay.vosburgh@canonical.com] >[original patch link https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/12115.1588207324@famine/] >Fixes: 6d2c89441571 ("PCI/ERR: Update error status after reset_link()") >Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh >Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan I've tested this patch set on one of our test machines, and it resolves the issue. I plan to test with other systems tomorrow. -J >--- > drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c >index 14bb8f54723e..5fe8561c7185 100644 >--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c >+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c >@@ -165,8 +165,28 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev, > pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast error_detected message\n"); > if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen) { > pci_walk_bus(bus, report_frozen_detected, &status); >- status = reset_link(dev); >- if (status != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) { >+ /* >+ * After resetting the link using reset_link() call, the >+ * possible value of error status is either >+ * PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT (failure case) or >+ * PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET (success case). >+ * So ignore the return value of report_error_detected() >+ * call for fatal errors. Instead use >+ * PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET as initial status value. >+ * >+ * Ignoring the status return value of report_error_detected() >+ * call will also help in case of EDR mode based error >+ * recovery. In EDR mode AER and DPC Capabilities are owned by >+ * firmware and hence report_error_detected() call will possibly >+ * return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NO_AER_DRIVER. So if we don't ignore >+ * the return value of report_error_detected() then >+ * pcie_do_recovery() would report incorrect status after >+ * successful recovery. Ignoring PCI_ERS_RESULT_NO_AER_DRIVER >+ * in non EDR case should not have any functional impact. >+ */ >+ status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET; >+ if (reset_link(dev) != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) { >+ status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT; > pci_warn(dev, "link reset failed\n"); > goto failed; > } >-- >2.17.1 > --- -Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@canonical.com