Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp2174577ybg; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 07:25:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzjLkQrlOX+eBhOpcDUXlERj7ab5Tikq7wZu994k4JjCIrvDk48zC49FWRIlIYHxqLw6A3R X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c15a:: with SMTP id r26mr9083963edp.21.1591367155407; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 07:25:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591367155; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OFscs6psG0Q0FdHDJsr+bsDwsLfCqcfTeNZy1BORkvjtAlMj8/fx8FIlKFcNv1PZJj Qq9fQzmGm8DY3ZaTdwCBRupn96JoLkh/OnnKNXv6lwat3+IqzYsADbnd4CmhwlFipeMD 9ur73MlBUoVnAprqaie7BX+l/esohYo7WkpLyBozPms3xD+ga7LxzWBUZronHxpiOZdS X37kuGlhi3HTJAxizsx0n799NBOGTrdACdIHLXgP21j48ZXh5KcJf8SmAY7MGZCfSN0k 8Rvf1JEXKcTZQLo+EZ+Iic/JBB2tkftH1Y4OXMo2hk1Qx1Cwi8HiO5+BVBwCaOjS2R8b KAvA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=euopa30XZTK9PZNxOT1+GfKDnHyEi7QLOoA/3wrxJls=; b=qGn3vBB9gs1HamMvP/AP2OTQpicVQb/WdNcFg8q21JBa40R0rYJDnVe+VUpAuq/Cqg Lk84Yv57f0HFcIOvKynbPzN4HPuB/oNTbM2zeTcFJ80xTl0fzeZBSztxX+lK0Q7fmjw7 QK8vh7N2NFyJVm019wJkMwl/b2oNzcCf700kPYyu5Ma9YvU2xIAlYJj++X974oIFEVnV 2qgd3v+o2zcQF8erRc1HNGcDOO7G1YhcJqz02E7qxVZlDutk/ZFOr7tPOuazLzen26tw n3wBALWJDq7Kw0oaYwgbX+kLY6HSNhP1f5sqfzfTdz2YtZ2QOYpFIN90JvJxXUueMGJ1 xCEQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=QQA10iVF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g10si2522026edr.463.2020.06.05.07.25.32; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 07:25:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=QQA10iVF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728388AbgFEOUG (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 5 Jun 2020 10:20:06 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50806 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728333AbgFEOTv (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2020 10:19:51 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9CEA4208A9; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:19:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591366790; bh=5J7NALb6RK7TOv0ylJHhaJY8+SNpxeudsxz5OEu+xro=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QQA10iVF0m8112JJZDFtOv95/c1OPTNZQH8KeUZMUW0ng3Oo1gnzuRdW2QTBR9W1m neM17fV1wlHQh1DoeDnGr+q0ML1YikywUGsKc4Hpip9MZ3wQD5fxEowxyBebykreri p8t1ebBI20QdFrOe3js2cVgivH2xIHTHQXXBrRxU= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot , "Paul E. McKenney" , Madhuparna Bhowmik , Mimi Zohar , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.19 19/28] evm: Fix RCU list related warnings Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 16:15:21 +0200 Message-Id: <20200605140253.523085576@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20200605140252.338635395@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200605140252.338635395@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Madhuparna Bhowmik [ Upstream commit 770f60586d2af0590be263f55fd079226313922c ] This patch fixes the following warning and few other instances of traversal of evm_config_xattrnames list: [ 32.848432] ============================= [ 32.848707] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 32.848966] 5.7.0-rc1-00006-ga8d5875ce5f0b #1 Not tainted [ 32.849308] ----------------------------- [ 32.849567] security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c:231 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! Since entries are only added to the list and never deleted, use list_for_each_entry_lockless() instead of list_for_each_entry_rcu for traversing the list. Also, add a relevant comment in evm_secfs.c to indicate this fact. Reported-by: kernel test robot Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney (RCU viewpoint) Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c | 2 +- security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 4 ++-- security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c | 9 ++++++++- 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c index f0878d81dcef..d20f5792761c 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static int evm_calc_hmac_or_hash(struct dentry *dentry, data->hdr.length = crypto_shash_digestsize(desc->tfm); error = -ENODATA; - list_for_each_entry_rcu(xattr, &evm_config_xattrnames, list) { + list_for_each_entry_lockless(xattr, &evm_config_xattrnames, list) { bool is_ima = false; if (strcmp(xattr->name, XATTR_NAME_IMA) == 0) diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c index 7f3f54d89a6e..e11d860fdce4 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int evm_find_protected_xattrs(struct dentry *dentry) if (!(inode->i_opflags & IOP_XATTR)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; - list_for_each_entry_rcu(xattr, &evm_config_xattrnames, list) { + list_for_each_entry_lockless(xattr, &evm_config_xattrnames, list) { error = __vfs_getxattr(dentry, inode, xattr->name, NULL, 0); if (error < 0) { if (error == -ENODATA) @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static int evm_protected_xattr(const char *req_xattr_name) struct xattr_list *xattr; namelen = strlen(req_xattr_name); - list_for_each_entry_rcu(xattr, &evm_config_xattrnames, list) { + list_for_each_entry_lockless(xattr, &evm_config_xattrnames, list) { if ((strlen(xattr->name) == namelen) && (strncmp(req_xattr_name, xattr->name, namelen) == 0)) { found = 1; diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c index 77de71b7794c..f112ca593adc 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c @@ -237,7 +237,14 @@ static ssize_t evm_write_xattrs(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, goto out; } - /* Guard against races in evm_read_xattrs */ + /* + * xattr_list_mutex guards against races in evm_read_xattrs(). + * Entries are only added to the evm_config_xattrnames list + * and never deleted. Therefore, the list is traversed + * using list_for_each_entry_lockless() without holding + * the mutex in evm_calc_hmac_or_hash(), evm_find_protected_xattrs() + * and evm_protected_xattr(). + */ mutex_lock(&xattr_list_mutex); list_for_each_entry(tmp, &evm_config_xattrnames, list) { if (strcmp(xattr->name, tmp->name) == 0) { -- 2.25.1