Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp2176486ybg; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 07:28:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzCxjbCWhVtmF5SgsNSU5St2MqHbKHihby5oL6pIeb4bK01nmKHHyIZM6hJaKyYScqrUrYI X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:4096:: with SMTP id nm6mr8991175ejb.4.1591367306722; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 07:28:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591367306; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Nezb3rRlTaiA3XDEHibgSXKiqks/To5crg/Qj9QrPqGJSrpchy8dfuAKCz6UAJ+SUp dD9a2Fm29pNCF0fRGarRxKvRSCHeCuum3CRfe+ngn6ufg6rAKw+5IaAsXHpldkCFNPmS 4RLS3L6SZJiVyknX+7ksymKEI9U5UkQ/Os+jzU7hMUSZl+087FpfJkzQDSuZYHbug1Cf NDGY/MDGy0qZo5vGb2n/AMxDGSgYQtl1RyG0z4EFCyKSHgV63zibtDt7FFbVWTeVuvd9 fP61MGnyyvRauFRZRZn94cfUBVsgNmb15NmayomuankGK98j9m2uA1gJ9ciwql+9bEHq Z2bQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=/FQdc3OOgROKj7wquRCEW2jAJk63jGeVECmEaZ1k+UI=; b=hWAY2ouklh70J+GKxdd2Fyx1IngA72h8SQiJyRcqy7HcvLu5nVefh/hVHxivKhi1Ox ZnQz7F+jCcaWsKGJyJi6UXM7oAAfYrSo8Ul52Q67UTOHdg28woZZWN+y03/8kP07n8lh br7ix/ADvYLQnqLVM10J5nRGNLDLKy6iko9ZxqUCa9BcAuRqnDgi1joWYb44hi1EZrQX bu26ayFI07FTHpm5AEQHMPU2K9fR63vSQxTrvcg72gzm/KxXXfQA+aiNfnc/GJHBMF6O xc7icwc9N0/kPjAFw424aid3ltyoQpn0KHQmlvtAZLNIErOuMnzviZ3QOKGIZzYE1F47 Izlw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=D19uAaLJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cb4si3704827ejb.299.2020.06.05.07.28.04; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 07:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=D19uAaLJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728500AbgFEORh (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 5 Jun 2020 10:17:37 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46910 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728484AbgFEORa (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2020 10:17:30 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44CE920835; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:17:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591366648; bh=prOMc/RStpaK3YUH4KzHyr5ESVXotKLWP1/xmvu8a7w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=D19uAaLJ/olPgY/Zh3RmLy5N+Wn22ejIZstY8E/Ns1UU7k+daetjv7sUmu95LNYP7 J/TmyCI1+6pVdR71pSjH6ycWnRBZ8OBWhxo0m8uxtQN/UVDz4UGlAnIaHuMOCNNeN0 +7C3zri5PZKcE3GuPQSx8imtf0P9UTXumtGhIRpA= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot , "Paul E. McKenney" , Madhuparna Bhowmik , Mimi Zohar , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.6 06/43] evm: Fix RCU list related warnings Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 16:14:36 +0200 Message-Id: <20200605140152.855884236@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20200605140152.493743366@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200605140152.493743366@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Madhuparna Bhowmik [ Upstream commit 770f60586d2af0590be263f55fd079226313922c ] This patch fixes the following warning and few other instances of traversal of evm_config_xattrnames list: [ 32.848432] ============================= [ 32.848707] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 32.848966] 5.7.0-rc1-00006-ga8d5875ce5f0b #1 Not tainted [ 32.849308] ----------------------------- [ 32.849567] security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c:231 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! Since entries are only added to the list and never deleted, use list_for_each_entry_lockless() instead of list_for_each_entry_rcu for traversing the list. Also, add a relevant comment in evm_secfs.c to indicate this fact. Reported-by: kernel test robot Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney (RCU viewpoint) Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c | 2 +- security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 4 ++-- security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c | 9 ++++++++- 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c index cc826c2767a3..fbc2ee6d46fc 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static int evm_calc_hmac_or_hash(struct dentry *dentry, data->hdr.length = crypto_shash_digestsize(desc->tfm); error = -ENODATA; - list_for_each_entry_rcu(xattr, &evm_config_xattrnames, list) { + list_for_each_entry_lockless(xattr, &evm_config_xattrnames, list) { bool is_ima = false; if (strcmp(xattr->name, XATTR_NAME_IMA) == 0) diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c index f9a81b187fae..a2c393385db0 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static int evm_find_protected_xattrs(struct dentry *dentry) if (!(inode->i_opflags & IOP_XATTR)) return -EOPNOTSUPP; - list_for_each_entry_rcu(xattr, &evm_config_xattrnames, list) { + list_for_each_entry_lockless(xattr, &evm_config_xattrnames, list) { error = __vfs_getxattr(dentry, inode, xattr->name, NULL, 0); if (error < 0) { if (error == -ENODATA) @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static int evm_protected_xattr(const char *req_xattr_name) struct xattr_list *xattr; namelen = strlen(req_xattr_name); - list_for_each_entry_rcu(xattr, &evm_config_xattrnames, list) { + list_for_each_entry_lockless(xattr, &evm_config_xattrnames, list) { if ((strlen(xattr->name) == namelen) && (strncmp(req_xattr_name, xattr->name, namelen) == 0)) { found = 1; diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c index c11c1f7b3ddd..0f37ef27268d 100644 --- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c +++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c @@ -234,7 +234,14 @@ static ssize_t evm_write_xattrs(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, goto out; } - /* Guard against races in evm_read_xattrs */ + /* + * xattr_list_mutex guards against races in evm_read_xattrs(). + * Entries are only added to the evm_config_xattrnames list + * and never deleted. Therefore, the list is traversed + * using list_for_each_entry_lockless() without holding + * the mutex in evm_calc_hmac_or_hash(), evm_find_protected_xattrs() + * and evm_protected_xattr(). + */ mutex_lock(&xattr_list_mutex); list_for_each_entry(tmp, &evm_config_xattrnames, list) { if (strcmp(xattr->name, tmp->name) == 0) { -- 2.25.1