Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp2188594ybg; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 07:45:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxM/VTStFE9vMH5LOCFyA35RpR4avqg1/Mm72Bf+cKd/7XTuP/tINkZCe8sP1uMQIIPBYrU X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:39a:: with SMTP id o26mr9957992edv.10.1591368318624; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 07:45:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591368318; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zotFbPgDodGDhYU5QtTPhY2GLblo6+ZJP4adYWeFW7yjOP65dxrCYNKD9CqsnCQY1/ V8RdQVEE+ehsOJtjaE2TGWuL2mekya+EJmpl+gQetBW5HhQwNMZ02Dos26OZBP8anGR1 Z58tu0T5x03gzl+ifG8fRWN0wSkOylXEsJzBrjEDquDPcjBTzkC7HvuXtHY9pmihl1gE NY72l8R7+ulUhfNUS2Y1nI58rcVN3MgcmF4mo60EGcypt8Kn0rvFjwR/cX396HoCswQD 8tM41JehHNwUKwcqfRvu01p5mEevXdGbMdAlQJfyCXme72zMWbkPMd59i9+NkaGYLfQp +mQg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=Oa3HFWfXUN5MQ2Kh3RZ2G39xgudOL8qg8QGMVPMGSG4=; b=Gy3RPgX1LW3lJQhgwtZiNQd5wrbjRFi2tLXsI7bjMZvMLgN+m+P6i56uM/joa2akeP fzM22So1ARFq2Ul5QQUi+hmeHqMEzXsdazIxk4M0W7afvORWiN3STjzcvNpFiLBT/vCG /QTmKwM793W1ekjK8TSdt7TMlmSe9jS9Utg3FV4jqmbziMY/u2j1hr+1yY7JwbV58F7O LLlZwjj29vh7Qs+d4x7xBRF7UkR/4xQppeirk2xZbatF0RRLkE1OMdcQ6j82RwGMlgHQ ipgmE0XySraxQeUzSm+KYbzuml5fF8UOCsNfTlfm3KQTyEbISjwnxL9CQASHfjaqSZ7z zi2A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cf23si3587323ejb.540.2020.06.05.07.44.56; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 07:45:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728314AbgFEOmj (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 5 Jun 2020 10:42:39 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58088 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728007AbgFEOmi (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2020 10:42:38 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24986AAD0; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quack2.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4B4D41E1281; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 16:42:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 16:42:36 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Jason Yan , Jan Kara , Markus Elfring , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hulkci@huawei.com, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Ming Lei Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: Fix use-after-free in blkdev_get() Message-ID: <20200605144236.GB13248@quack2.suse.cz> References: <88676ff2-cb7e-70ec-4421-ecf8318990b1@web.de> <5fa658bf-3028-9b5c-30cc-dbdef6bf8f7a@huawei.com> <20200605094353.GS30374@kadam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200605094353.GS30374@kadam> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri 05-06-20 12:43:54, Dan Carpenter wrote: > I wonder if maybe the best fix is to re-add the "if (!res) " check back > to blkdev_get(). Well, it won't be that simple since we need to call bd_abort_claiming() under bdev->bd_mutex. And the fact that __blkdev_get() frees the reference you pass to it is somewhat subtle and surprising so I think we are better off getting rid of that. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR