Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:20:28 -0700
From:   Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc:     io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v5 0/12] Add support for async buffered reads
Message-ID: <20200605202028.d57nklzpeolukni7@alap3.anarazel.de>
References: <20200526195123.29053-1-axboe@kernel.dk>
 <20200604005916.niy2mejjcsx4sv6t@alap3.anarazel.de>
 <e3072371-1d6b-8ae5-d946-d83e60427cb0@kernel.dk>
 <6eeff14f-befc-a5cc-08da-cb77f811fbdf@kernel.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6eeff14f-befc-a5cc-08da-cb77f811fbdf@kernel.dk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 2020-06-05 08:42:28 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Can you try with async-buffered.7? I've rebased it on a new mechanism,
> and doing something like what you describe above I haven't been able
> to trigger anything bad. I'd try your test case specifically, so do let
> know if it's something I can run.

I tried my test on async-buffered.7?, and I get hangs very quickly after
starting. Unfortunately, I don't seem to get an OOPSs, not sure yet why.

Let me know if my test triggers for you.

I'll go and try to figure out why I don't see an oops...

Regards,

Andres