Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030361AbWCUQdp (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:33:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030277AbWCUQdn (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:33:43 -0500 Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:11392 "EHLO mail.cs.helsinki.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030361AbWCUQaV (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:30:21 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: introduce kmem_cache_zalloc allocator From: Pekka Enberg To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060321032521.03a8d6de.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20060321032521.03a8d6de.akpm@osdl.org> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 18:30:16 +0200 Message-Id: <1142958616.21308.1.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 789 Lines: 22 Pekka J Enberg wrote: > > > > This patch introduces a memory-zeroing variant of kmem_cache_alloc. > > On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 03:25 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Problem is, after I've weathered 10000000000 convert-to-kmem_cache_zalloc > patches, those pestiferous NUMA people are going to come along wanting > kmem_cache_kzalloc_node(). > > Probably this should be designed for up-front? Actually, we don't even have kzalloc_node, so I'd say we're better of waiting for the NUMA folk to ask for them. Hum? Pekka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/