Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp404883ybg; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 03:47:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwakS9RvqhvGnuTmL6f0VBqGzPZYFPMnzMNfLgANKZvjNYibZ19E0BV7ogZpXkd0XeGMlG/ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b04b:: with SMTP id bj11mr24940035ejb.516.1591699640602; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 03:47:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591699640; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ANF50M41uYa6x5wDcXblQeyI41CIQvY8ia366RunoX3rqbK4A0eV4A1A60wnvCPKZq 3msFQprALpjmQB9xdAAJkZ2zQpMNTF50W1R6gXkMzczLNJ2I2fp6OPJ36FYH7vtnPosz KqoodoXZ2qRpjvH7Cnzz+rGMah1Vpy3lP6uDG3l8ZayNviair81HrbrKbemYBCiPlfHP XU5wCT/D7Amro2bkEpZ/J8n+UpDC6ARyr1McA8aJupj5PAcWaoqElJ1tV6Oyq+6+HNGg gakxX0Mz3eXEFhhaf1q3UtW+mR2vjmQv/NRp/421LBV3LJdbG+vC1QpR4yXQdOVATJ6b 9vSA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:message-id:date; bh=IWt5+kPgivoImTOZ8Fmnu5G79MiRyIYjNlQoLp8/das=; b=Fr2uGuA9aFas728CRMgdnEuqkCaPOs15rT2WrMhYF1LXETfhPZmdvHi+r4ZwFBfbls A256lTvCL5KlWHDDWLCBS8c0wilgLY8rQMRo51VX6vvcttSbBMX+SXLEhNQZUKFMydDk dmee9+F1ELf89JyXbyJwoT3Po5NTHVCPmHFhV8Q8Xm1nPxp4bunUS6xg1iYAYHKoBFYU 1kqvP2tXYGHqQFi/w4R/knuhrc+rvByxxAafBsu3oMPIs7GOCQDHGij5Iu+s/Mzwpcm/ ysKv/XNOzDZvnHTwYpLoaebdT2Dxu6fBEQIf055opf0/JBjI4GaKP+kRFcWZBT4Uuoqp pbHg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id by19si10567067ejb.216.2020.06.09.03.46.39; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 03:47:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728135AbgFIJJR (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 05:09:17 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57938 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727858AbgFIJJR (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 05:09:17 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C40ADCE; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 09:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 11:09:14 +0200 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: David Rientjes , "Alex Xu (Hello71)" , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, bp@alien8.de, hch@infradead.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, Pavel Machek , perex@perex.cz, tglx@linutronix.de, tiwai@suse.com, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: next-0519 on thinkpad x60: sound related? window manager crash In-Reply-To: <20200609084305.GA21671@lst.de> References: <20200520111136.GA3802@amd> <1591545088.74ii116nf2.none@localhost> <20200608061950.GA17476@lst.de> <1591624340.z01ejtod28.none@localhost> <20200609054306.GA9606@lst.de> <20200609084305.GA21671@lst.de> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/25.3 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:43:05 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 10:05:26AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > >From the disassembly it seems like a vmalloc allocation is NULL, which > > > seems really weird as this patch shouldn't make a difference for them, > > > and I also only see a single places that allocates the field, and that > > > checks for an allocation failure. But the sound code is a little > > > hard to unwind sometimes. > > > > It's not clear which sound device being affected, but if it's > > HD-audio on x86, runtime->dma_area points to a vmapped buffer from > > SG-pages allocated by dma_alloc_coherent(). > > > > OTOH, if it's a USB-audio, runtime->dma_area is a buffer by > > vmalloc(). > > Err, you can't just vmap a buffer returned from dma_alloc_coherent, > dma_alloc_coherent returns values are opaque and can't be used > for virt_to_page. Whatever that code did has already been broken > per the DMA API contract and on many architectures and just happend > to work on x86 by accident. Hmm, that's bad. How would be a proper way to get the virtually mapped SG-buffer pages with coherent memory? (Also allowing user-space mmap, too) thanks, Takashi