Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp566250ybg; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:30:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRTAcm+jXiYYFnKfr1WNa4fiPp6tsExNiXuMyrjvwDOWExTMp1gaOGbzquhjLq4LR6jQNz X-Received: by 2002:a50:f052:: with SMTP id u18mr26552201edl.16.1591713037061; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 07:30:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591713037; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pMi/qQnpnb86IxvYp5G167fFIEl4l48WPYgFLB31pJDj6JVOXuSLc616EHK9IRx694 xMYjcUxqi2iBvmPlZOSzArlEchThZfqvupnFS7LsIn1Oqk5iOyVz/YZc7RejugEgFg96 PElh6thU7MjM3hR+fPZ0VtnZt/RU1tBwv2+a/KDcSi9NKaRAnelumpJsGJThEMDJ6j7C H9wY/NF4BUAuztGaQ3C5TtsoAhAEJJxh25CDFSevWK3nQoX5C1dNsw1kici4VhgsDd7c 40jlroBYzLn/1wveN2wwzGLpH3paM1QAF5JpKyi/FW/wG+2h55XYqu4ZZenLtOzrbcN0 u/nQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=VCvrbi93Uj62pDoqOCJ4dDghecya12LMoCiUmK7qhLk=; b=qkM5yeFsir/zO0JoY1XBuo92r94Rx1e7/TVzHXjvbbJs0WNwCnItTv2uyYarP1ZSEI yNWAS3tI0FOL40uUnube23heI9gLobHP7fCWWGAeNeFkkDlF9L/v7C6vYazehqbIWU1c /XN7Uzif7dVPSi6PTYPV2O+5gmOVILIRKkie2djT08dMSkaPSsxXHMlaIAxGSNSGcFOs MV/FtqG0FpPe03QWXvswPU3UkXUvu+VNlLvP/JlkiKY4WIdaOTLctY7Clu7te0sBsTPQ PhApW1km3lO7oAg7DgtuxxEQICaq3KtoZMsuWLMjPEvhiDH0sokGQoBgg6T+14vREohY /KAA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=U5foZ6Zm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f7si10731591ejr.406.2020.06.09.07.30.13; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 07:30:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=U5foZ6Zm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730243AbgFIO2B (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 10:28:01 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:23303 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728423AbgFIO2B (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 10:28:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1591712878; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VCvrbi93Uj62pDoqOCJ4dDghecya12LMoCiUmK7qhLk=; b=U5foZ6Zm2M78uKa66BhNcQLWYuoopcnTzBZxS4OuIR3fjzhp1pnYo2zdTlVSd7uGIpZ0La yBZQ9t7/DsX+OczpuNB9t4o9FXwlnUF+cFyrOu6dFGqKGIqJDkUGT3z25Xrn8WbfuJlbUR cmlwFLD5wB48aCWILhrqSBikmpuKKKg= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-422-L_anddZINkivHZ5odc1cHw-1; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:27:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: L_anddZINkivHZ5odc1cHw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB4A683DE2B; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-13-95.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.13.95]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 988E22B5B6; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 22:27:47 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Jaewon Kim Cc: mgorman@techsingularity.net, minchan@kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, hannes@cmpxchg.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jaewon31.kim@gmail.com, ytk.lee@samsung.com, cmlaika.kim@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] page_alloc: consider highatomic reserve in wmartermark fast Message-ID: <20200609142747.GA3346@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> References: <20200609095128.8112-1-jaewon31.kim@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200609095128.8112-1-jaewon31.kim@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/09/20 at 06:51pm, Jaewon Kim wrote: > zone_watermark_fast was introduced by commit 48ee5f3696f6 ("mm, > page_alloc: shortcut watermark checks for order-0 pages"). The commit > simply checks if free pages is bigger than watermark without additional > calculation such like reducing watermark. > > It considered free cma pages but it did not consider highatomic > reserved. This may incur exhaustion of free pages except high order > atomic free pages. > > Assume that reserved_highatomic pageblock is bigger than watermark min, > and there are only few free pages except high order atomic free. Because > zone_watermark_fast passes the allocation without considering high order > atomic free, normal reclaimable allocation like GFP_HIGHUSER will > consume all the free pages. Then finally order-0 atomic allocation may > fail on allocation. > > This means watermark min is not protected against non-atomic allocation. > The order-0 atomic allocation with ALLOC_HARDER unwantedly can be > failed. Additionally the __GFP_MEMALLOC allocation with > ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS also can be failed. > > To avoid the problem, zone_watermark_fast should consider highatomic > reserve. If the actual size of high atomic free is counted accurately > like cma free, we may use it. On this patch just use > nr_reserved_highatomic. > > This is trace log which shows GFP_HIGHUSER consumes free pages right > before ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS. > > <...>-22275 [006] .... 889.213383: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000d2be5665 pfn=970744 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO > <...>-22275 [006] .... 889.213385: mm_page_alloc: page=000000004b2335c2 pfn=970745 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO > <...>-22275 [006] .... 889.213387: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000017272e1 pfn=970278 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO > <...>-22275 [006] .... 889.213389: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000c4be79fb pfn=970279 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO > <...>-22275 [006] .... 889.213391: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000f8a51d4f pfn=970260 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO > <...>-22275 [006] .... 889.213393: mm_page_alloc: page=000000006ba8f5ac pfn=970261 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO > <...>-22275 [006] .... 889.213395: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000819f1cd3 pfn=970196 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO > <...>-22275 [006] .... 889.213396: mm_page_alloc: page=00000000f6b72a64 pfn=970197 order=0 migratetype=0 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_ZERO > kswapd0-1207 [005] ...1 889.213398: mm_page_alloc: page= (null) pfn=0 order=0 migratetype=1 nr_free=3650 gfp_flags=GFP_NOWAIT|__GFP_HIGHMEM|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_MOVABLE > > This is an example of ALLOC_HARDER allocation failure. > > <4>[ 6207.637280] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] Binder:9343_3: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x480020(GFP_ATOMIC), nodemask=(null) > <4>[ 6207.637311] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] Call trace: > <4>[ 6207.637346] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] [] dump_stack+0xb8/0xf0 > <4>[ 6207.637356] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] [] warn_alloc+0xd8/0x12c > <4>[ 6207.637365] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] [] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x120c/0x1250 > <4>[ 6207.637374] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] [] new_slab+0x128/0x604 > <4>[ 6207.637381] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] [] ___slab_alloc+0x508/0x670 > <4>[ 6207.637387] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] [] __kmalloc+0x2f8/0x310 > <4>[ 6207.637396] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] [] context_struct_to_string+0x104/0x1cc > <4>[ 6207.637404] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] [] security_sid_to_context_core+0x74/0x144 > <4>[ 6207.637412] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] [] security_sid_to_context+0x10/0x18 > <4>[ 6207.637421] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] [] selinux_secid_to_secctx+0x20/0x28 > <4>[ 6207.637430] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] [] security_secid_to_secctx+0x3c/0x70 > <4>[ 6207.637442] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] [] binder_transaction+0xe68/0x454c > <4>[ 6207.637569] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] Mem-Info: > <4>[ 6207.637595] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] active_anon:102061 inactive_anon:81551 isolated_anon:0 > <4>[ 6207.637595] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] active_file:59102 inactive_file:68924 isolated_file:64 > <4>[ 6207.637595] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] unevictable:611 dirty:63 writeback:0 unstable:0 > <4>[ 6207.637595] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] slab_reclaimable:13324 slab_unreclaimable:44354 > <4>[ 6207.637595] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] mapped:83015 shmem:4858 pagetables:26316 bounce:0 > <4>[ 6207.637595] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] free:2727 free_pcp:1035 free_cma:178 > <4>[ 6207.637616] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] Node 0 active_anon:408244kB inactive_anon:326204kB active_file:236408kB inactive_file:275696kB unevictable:2444kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):256kB mapped:332060kB dirty:252kB writeback:0kB shmem:19432kB writeback_tmp:0kB unstable:0kB all_unreclaimable? no > <4>[ 6207.637627] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] Normal free:10908kB min:6192kB low:44388kB high:47060kB active_anon:409160kB inactive_anon:325924kB active_file:235820kB inactive_file:276628kB unevictable:2444kB writepending:252kB present:3076096kB managed:2673676kB mlocked:2444kB kernel_stack:62512kB pagetables:105264kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:4140kB local_pcp:40kB free_cma:712kB > <4>[ 6207.637632] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 > <4>[ 6207.637637] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] Normal: 505*4kB (H) 357*8kB (H) 201*16kB (H) 65*32kB (H) 1*64kB (H) 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 10236kB > <4>[ 6207.637655] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] 138826 total pagecache pages > <4>[ 6207.637663] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] 5460 pages in swap cache > <4>[ 6207.637668] [3: Binder:9343_3:22875] Swap cache stats: add 8273090, delete 8267506, find 1004381/4060142 > > This is an example of ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS allocation failure. > > <6>[ 156.701551] [4: kswapd0: 1209] kswapd0 cpuset=/ mems_allowed=0 > <4>[ 156.701563] [4: kswapd0: 1209] CPU: 4 PID: 1209 Comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G W 4.14.113-18113966 #1 > <4>[ 156.701572] [4: kswapd0: 1209] Call trace: > <4>[ 156.701605] [4: kswapd0: 1209] [<0000000000000000>] dump_stack+0x68/0x90 > <4>[ 156.701612] [4: kswapd0: 1209] [<0000000000000000>] warn_alloc+0x104/0x198 > <4>[ 156.701617] [4: kswapd0: 1209] [<0000000000000000>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xdc0/0xdf0 > <4>[ 156.701623] [4: kswapd0: 1209] [<0000000000000000>] zs_malloc+0x148/0x3d0 > <4>[ 156.701630] [4: kswapd0: 1209] [<0000000000000000>] zram_bvec_rw+0x250/0x568 > <4>[ 156.701634] [4: kswapd0: 1209] [<0000000000000000>] zram_rw_page+0x8c/0xe0 > <4>[ 156.701640] [4: kswapd0: 1209] [<0000000000000000>] bdev_write_page+0x70/0xbc > <4>[ 156.701645] [4: kswapd0: 1209] [<0000000000000000>] __swap_writepage+0x58/0x37c > <4>[ 156.701649] [4: kswapd0: 1209] [<0000000000000000>] swap_writepage+0x40/0x4c > <4>[ 156.701654] [4: kswapd0: 1209] [<0000000000000000>] shrink_page_list+0xc3c/0xf54 > <4>[ 156.701659] [4: kswapd0: 1209] [<0000000000000000>] shrink_inactive_list+0x2b0/0x61c > <4>[ 156.701664] [4: kswapd0: 1209] [<0000000000000000>] shrink_node_memcg+0x23c/0x618 > <4>[ 156.701668] [4: kswapd0: 1209] [<0000000000000000>] shrink_node+0x1c8/0x304 > <4>[ 156.701673] [4: kswapd0: 1209] [<0000000000000000>] kswapd+0x680/0x7c4 > <4>[ 156.701679] [4: kswapd0: 1209] [<0000000000000000>] kthread+0x110/0x120 > <4>[ 156.701684] [4: kswapd0: 1209] [<0000000000000000>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 > <4>[ 156.701689] [4: kswapd0: 1209] Mem-Info: > <4>[ 156.701712] [4: kswapd0: 1209] active_anon:88690 inactive_anon:88630 isolated_anon:0 > <4>[ 156.701712] [4: kswapd0: 1209] active_file:99173 inactive_file:169305 isolated_file:32 > <4>[ 156.701712] [4: kswapd0: 1209] unevictable:48292 dirty:538 writeback:38 unstable:0 > <4>[ 156.701712] [4: kswapd0: 1209] slab_reclaimable:15131 slab_unreclaimable:47762 > <4>[ 156.701712] [4: kswapd0: 1209] mapped:274654 shmem:2824 pagetables:25088 bounce:0 > <4>[ 156.701712] [4: kswapd0: 1209] free:2489 free_pcp:444 free_cma:3 > <4>[ 156.701728] [4: kswapd0: 1209] Node 0 active_anon:354760kB inactive_anon:354520kB active_file:396692kB inactive_file:677220kB unevictable:193168kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):128kB mapped:1098616kB dirty:2152kB writeback:152kB shmem:11296kB writeback_tmp:0kB unstable:0kB all_unreclaimable? no > <4>[ 156.701738] [4: kswapd0: 1209] Normal free:9956kB min:7428kB low:93440kB high:97032kB active_anon:355176kB inactive_anon:354580kB active_file:396196kB inactive_file:677284kB unevictable:193168kB writepending:2304kB present:4081664kB managed:3593324kB mlocked:193168kB kernel_stack:55008kB pagetables:100352kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:1776kB local_pcp:656kB free_cma:12kB > <4>[ 156.701741] [4: kswapd0: 1209] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 > <4>[ 156.701747] [4: kswapd0: 1209] Normal: 196*4kB (H) 141*8kB (H) 109*16kB (H) 63*32kB (H) 20*64kB (H) 8*128kB (H) 2*256kB (H) 1*512kB (H) 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 9000kB > > Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim > Reported-by: Yong-Taek Lee > --- > mm/page_alloc.c | 13 +++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index 13cc653122b7..00869378d387 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -3553,6 +3553,11 @@ static inline bool zone_watermark_fast(struct zone *z, unsigned int order, > { > long free_pages = zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_PAGES); > long cma_pages = 0; > + long highatomic = 0; > + const bool alloc_harder = (alloc_flags & (ALLOC_HARDER|ALLOC_OOM)); > + > + if (likely(!alloc_harder)) > + highatomic = z->nr_reserved_highatomic; > > #ifdef CONFIG_CMA > /* If allocation can't use CMA areas don't use free CMA pages */ > @@ -3567,8 +3572,12 @@ static inline bool zone_watermark_fast(struct zone *z, unsigned int order, > * the caller is !atomic then it'll uselessly search the free > * list. That corner case is then slower but it is harmless. > */ > - if (!order && (free_pages - cma_pages) > mark + z->lowmem_reserve[classzone_idx]) > - return true; > + if (!order) { > + long fast_free = free_pages - cma_pages - highatomic; > + > + if (fast_free > mark + z->lowmem_reserve[classzone_idx]) This looks reasonable to me. However, this change may not be rebased on top of the latest mainline tree or mm tree. E.g in this commit 97a225e69a1f8 ("mm/page_alloc: integrate classzone_idx and high_zoneidx"), classzone_idx has been changed to highest_zoneidx. > + return true; > + } > > return __zone_watermark_ok(z, order, mark, classzone_idx, alloc_flags, > free_pages); > -- > 2.17.1 > >