Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751079AbWCVHmP (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:42:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751080AbWCVHmP (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:42:15 -0500 Received: from pproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.166.178]:22252 "EHLO pproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751079AbWCVHmP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:42:15 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IHsluRHwtfjiqRoJ0sgaxTkl1LSPCPPdtPCKtyWwVtFqF/REpFfC7AdISiYlWQ6mBViGNzV9Dx9lwPJYP35J5LQndrIL9LN0fagNYIGtQvvnFdVWLKan+BgqZ6cw5tOrna4QJSFbzkWd+hXqvSk4o+l15n9XjhPLXQQftlMnAo8= Message-ID: <489ecd0c0603212342w4124dddfy1bb50c02984c0e8f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:42:14 +0800 From: "Luke Yang" To: "Andrew Morton" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2]Blackfin archtecture patche for 2.6.16 Cc: "Robin Getz" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060321223652.25bf07f7.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <6.1.1.1.0.20060321224917.01ec6970@ptg1.spd.analog.com> <20060321223652.25bf07f7.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1806 Lines: 53 On 3/22/06, Andrew Morton wrote: > Robin Getz wrote: > > > > Luke Yang wrote: > > >On 3/21/06, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > - How widespread/popular is the blackfin? Are many devices using it? > > > > How old/mature is it? Is it a new thing or is it near end-of-life? > > > As a DSP, Blackfin has been there for years and is somewhat popular. > > >But as a CPU which can run Linux, we are trying to make it popular. > > >Anyway a 5$ chip runs Linux and can do audio/video codec is a good toy to > > >play with. > > > > I would not describe it as a toy (sorry Luke), > > > > [ interesting info ] > > > > Thanks. > > > If you think our patch sucks, fine - let us know where to fix it. > > It looks reasonable to me, from a ten-minute-scan. > > Well. All architecture ports suck. Yours sucks averagely ;) > > The todo list of which I'm aware is > > - use serial core in that driver > > - Fix up that ioctl so it a) doesn't sleep in spinlock and b) compiles > > - Use generic IRQ framework > > - Review all the volatiles, consolidate them in some helper-in-header-file. > > - Sort out maintainance issues, gather signed-off-bys. (Done, it appears) > > More things might come out once people start paying more attention, but if > that's the extent of things, I'd be OK with a merge when you're ready. Does this merge has to be within 1 week after the release, so we have to wait for 2.6.17? Or this can be done on mm-tree? > -- Best regards, Luke Yang magic.yyang@gmail.com; luke.adi@gmail.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/