Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp662639ybg; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 09:41:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw00rxdFC/b1lqhoVAkZsxiBFfZ2+2gooV0rsjECU/PVSLaD6x1rvhQ430m4sfCpAjsotlZ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:abca:: with SMTP id kq10mr25715104ejb.242.1591720865722; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 09:41:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591720865; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ufxpXadztaLUz74ss5/sMDUiTQUE0lQWG79j+X2Ck3Ki94qLBgx2YH97eIYQ8IYHoF /2x3ZuBIUQiEFbzON9U4ZUkl403VYBc1Y9SqM9voVXPqIZm4pM/RE832XrVHwnhgRu6b lyGBPHdraZgvMdUFNsR5x9e4xU3aqCCh8zfzRK96dKeKrjoNSEh/+n/v+XmIcu0Ug9TT CoAp1a2K5RVX91KjmAimy+3ff3gUsdYDGX0ofH0z3SJn6vro6LJqsA0wer9QUWVoPC0A oKLB/BP9OJ1blD+mITvrtVGte5MWOQBw6k5gh1wk2NoQmCVdt16bL+88SYmHAe06RXXf dg7g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:dkim-signature; bh=47m4c67NQmMGP0uYxblsl5MMn1YEfYJqTmyXbRAMT6Q=; b=Jj+yQwFmRplwey8cXg3dHbwWOK+Cw1pTqSiRrwpauhkwStRkRAp6hz48+RFT5f5Ry7 lPG1jdy5bSVpE8X3I9GifJhw5fO0rwoLmrSLhHrKBPSBp346X2QHYqgqDtTyM4U/KP9F WVLKcAqpOr2D8eS+5QI8mkN22R8EMBTNE/EqvHS7K7zWnjnHic9ULOrup1VfYBjpcLPU 4F+ERpRRdLSyoIOoEu6eg5B2+lRd0ZshOD6il8jcqs4pbGObU3ie8Nzr7VrcXKyUibr+ K6KpaqbqJHeqn5Bc4hHKPh7kK9PqwXy8KRnU07F/7aIyrvaGQyVtjCBdcDYz9VsexfBi 6arQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@deltatee.com header.s=20200525 header.b=MMjuTPcO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lv27si11984189ejb.651.2020.06.09.09.40.42; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 09:41:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@deltatee.com header.s=20200525 header.b=MMjuTPcO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730635AbgFIQgC (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 12:36:02 -0400 Received: from ts18-13.vcr.istar.ca ([204.191.154.188]:42288 "EHLO ale.deltatee.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726100AbgFIQgB (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 12:36:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=deltatee.com; s=20200525; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Sender: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=47m4c67NQmMGP0uYxblsl5MMn1YEfYJqTmyXbRAMT6Q=; b=MMjuTPcO6mYInDTkMJo18+PE5E xNPOksnpi7UCnZ+KEUz5Cj5dgNur+uHjs9DZanlO0a5KD6Pd9vIRDqa6a2JYVOVMu7H84hQiKs1QX 0wIsOu1CsJZvMVITJ6+y2wLIY033ic6d6JK4VGJdZWXHEcx63J9r6tK0RMXn2MQ2XCR5ShlEgCB53 jrAwDj2Vx0lEDyDelg3CGZrJYcSQWskr/aNvabeLRJal9fHn0TB7sV4WzE9L9C4UNUiI1KCdxYyIV 2CEnMqqQKNqKvBpdXtr6rQV+NYQjWTVYC047MqBXl5Im3+bBCdFY/+L25PvIjUs+u8YFHGbl/C501 cBOVTrhw==; Received: from guinness.priv.deltatee.com ([172.16.1.162]) by ale.deltatee.com with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jihE7-0006xw-6u; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:35:52 -0600 To: Christoph Hellwig , Piotr Stankiewicz Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Kurt Schwemmer , Mika Westerberg , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andy Shevchenko , Olof Johansson , Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan , Kelvin Cao , Wesley Sheng , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Krzysztof Wilczynski , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20200609091148.32749-1-piotr.stankiewicz@intel.com> <20200609091650.801-1-piotr.stankiewicz@intel.com> <20200609155124.GB2597@infradead.org> From: Logan Gunthorpe Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 10:35:49 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200609155124.GB2597@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 172.16.1.162 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de, kw@linux.com, peterz@infradead.org, wesley.sheng@microchip.com, kelvin.cao@microchip.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, olof@lixom.net, andriy.shevchenko@intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, kurt.schwemmer@microsemi.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, piotr.stankiewicz@intel.com, hch@infradead.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: logang@deltatee.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on ale.deltatee.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, GREYLIST_ISWHITE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/15] PCI: Use PCI_IRQ_MSI_TYPES where appropriate X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on ale.deltatee.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020-06-09 9:51 a.m., Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 11:16:46AM +0200, Piotr Stankiewicz wrote: >> Seeing as there is shorthand available to use when asking for any type >> of interrupt, or any type of message signalled interrupt, leverage it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Piotr Stankiewicz >> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko >> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe > > The patch actually adding PCI_IRQ_MSI_TYPES still didn't show up on > linux-pci. > > But from the person who added PCI_IRQ_*: > > NAK to the whole concept of PCI_IRQ_MSI_TYPES, I think this just makes > the code a lot more confusing. Especially with the new IMS interrupt > type, which really is a MSI-like interrupt but certainly shouldn't be > added to this mask. Yes, after cleaning up the first patch to not require the long messy conditional, this change doesn't seems like a win. I agree we should drop these patches. Logan