Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp710089ybg; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 10:50:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzyWWXab33CkEl+U3V4LYVOxuG8ZEnPivPdO3ZjDLyct64luI93kfUfPZuIv9g8Zzp8sIi/ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a1cb:: with SMTP id bx11mr1525600ejb.526.1591725014983; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:50:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591725014; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=w9xlJx6N7endhG5dN+BRRnTDmMRDIDNsHH1IPgJD1kD0FDj+hosJjtvaueIj8nDzvi FxyNhPJcxEeP/KMXgtAnMlQeHd0Ow4o1Fp0vFJQ6ns2hXcjMqdMfbQ3FqWvGQWhckAWJ KG/kYHIgeqQxQji1j+bPmZ2AQtb6/00KjK7MOPsTF8EFEdqcsHP2pIaX70HSQX0TCtzV 4fYKhkaCkllqd9pi97fztU5UtjlN9K6P4dTGYgpLwZk57F9V2F+kkcXDj+FCze5dooJe Hrk0X4VJHsi+HzWcIJa3apyvbDaUyUs9kWZpLNaNZU5LTWDTfgw6rUFB7PVgIQKcHuuI 7A9A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=wsaf45n3WHoKm3j4nJUdSB5ov2cLNebnPo0PuKHsIL8=; b=ZG+xBabeVO8pvZIDTr9PlffBEBXIeQUMw4Xun2+1tkXaTZ+zsqznHYQNOhpDBvqH9F S+02r6M6jd9Q0n4EgTEu7EV1qPamarHEY/Jrj19YdibSYNPlFR6Pf1jMRHsyLfIChKHF UztM42NtObt3e9N2GGWfVOdgxKuxJQ2UicJci9Fp5OPsBtggyIxCb/EAVaVy5xeGBNGO HNz68HzMRdaK/XjARaKMq14eaGXP9Iya0VoNuxYFR1AnS7zIebhdS/ac4Er46Q/i0lQG b2Vnf1QTblK6Oi1bF8CzYJOHZzxgLHJgoZLc0QkdtBOHcBfPYNB9q2C+JnVqJ3SA6fMc /SSg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b="jYn0li/H"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v13si10654309ejx.703.2020.06.09.10.49.51; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:50:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b="jYn0li/H"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730831AbgFIPrQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 11:47:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50632 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730067AbgFIPrP (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 11:47:15 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x142.google.com (mail-il1-x142.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3772C03E97C for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 08:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-x142.google.com with SMTP id c75so8880529ila.8 for ; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 08:47:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wsaf45n3WHoKm3j4nJUdSB5ov2cLNebnPo0PuKHsIL8=; b=jYn0li/HQj9w3PWDCyHFqZ2+tnsWEv7f80eQQYB8+Yr8y5eWqIxg5dxNT/LbHxAxRr r+iqh1JkrEoXamNutu/CVIqvMKC6bU/kRsFwdj29gRGNKDlmKajeUdRW0pxzBF/Ai7Of hU2vdvK2f9XQNTnPcX/vWUZJaFdqyogYonyTwayX5AkW7y45VGXGnYNQYRgqBuwlXddS Oa4YvHlsyGpBaRm+Ib5BsEdC12Vbd+5JXOYwhvpOkvqsMEUZzeZKMrve1K8npFcAQby8 w8f7Z7/HuYtHnS9PrYGr2luoY/SguPizgvGz3CJn8thOP1u0Keg4kdHqM/2sXZX1SlbY SEhA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wsaf45n3WHoKm3j4nJUdSB5ov2cLNebnPo0PuKHsIL8=; b=Gq/f5I0c+Yo20burOake+2OoqJDJoHIyQS7qyO6IdvD3t8qcR+bi2TrPaEywdfxSck L9vwtiloQfiS30wg53JowoY47KWrxQ339tcZiD+rPSRRJmK9btQw+SwqPDT+kT8Kmmlo VgGREmIyJ+pyJjmpF9U+whetXOWf+2oCKYGN8WVtBzPAO9x4h37N3hnBiHu0h5P96LHL exsAcovfU7yMPQ37n11uN/+ibr1stP3Mkb0T5GuIFo0tyHb5Gjt9Joe2EVjMjJXQjFMb 6t590bvj7u9HM3HSD56aSQVD4piE8KM+sr48Zw0QxikrR2TRoHv0b4CTNtl5kX1BWtf9 sazQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533MHCdWM69nYVCy88RVYJ6zPOTVcQ2edQSI9YT25AruYBqSFpsb SZ3Os9n1t9dZvtGthSncZiyPYVCcunfVQpt40u01PQ== X-Received: by 2002:a92:c985:: with SMTP id y5mr26017334iln.50.1591717633705; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 08:47:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1591195783-10290-1-git-send-email-ben.levinsky@xilinx.com> <1591195783-10290-6-git-send-email-ben.levinsky@xilinx.com> <20200608234935.GA4268@xps15> In-Reply-To: From: Mathieu Poirier Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 09:47:02 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] remoteproc: Add initial zynqmp R5 remoteproc driver To: Ben Levinsky Cc: Suman Anna , "ohad@wizery.com" , "bjorn.andersson@linaro.org" , Michal Simek , Jolly Shah , Rajan Vaja , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jiaying Liang , "Ed T. Mooring" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 09:29, Ben Levinsky wrote: > > Hi Suman, Mathieu, > > Thank you for your comments. Please see my replies inline. > > Best Regards, > Ben > > -----Original Message----- > From: Suman Anna > Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 5:00 PM > To: Mathieu Poirier ; Ben Levinsky > Cc: ohad@wizery.com; bjorn.andersson@linaro.org; Michal Simek ; Jolly Shah ; Rajan Vaja ; = robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com; linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org;= linux-arm-kernell@lists.infradead.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-k= ernel@vger.kernel.org; Jiaying Liang ; Michal Simek ; Ed T. Mooring ; Jason Wu > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] remoteproc: Add initial zynqmp R5 remoteproc = driver > > On 6/8/20 6:49 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 07:49:43AM -0700, Ben Levinsky wrote: > >> R5 is included in Xilinx Zynq UltraScale MPSoC so by adding this > >> remotproc driver, we can boot the R5 sub-system in different > >> configurations. > >> > >> Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini > >> Acked-by: Ben Levinsky > >> Reviewed-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky > >> Signed-off-by: Wendy Liang > >> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek > >> Signed-off-by: Ed Mooring > >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wu > >> Tested-by: Ben Levinsky > >> --- > >> v2: > >> - remove domain struct as per review from Mathieu > >> v3: > >> - add xilinx-related platform mgmt fn's instead of wrapping around > >> function pointer in xilinx eemi ops struct > >> v4: > >> - add default values for enums > >> - fix formatting as per checkpatch.pl --strict. Note that 1 warning an= d 1 check > >> are still raised as each is due to fixing the warning results in > >> that particular line going over 80 characters. > >> v5: > >> - parse_fw change from use of rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init to > >> rproc_mem_entry_init and use of alloc/release > >> - var's of type zynqmp_r5_pdata all have same local variable name > >> - use dev_dbg instead of dev_info > >> > >> --- > >> drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 10 + > >> drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 + > >> drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c | 898 ++++++++++++++++++++= ++++++++++ > >> 3 files changed, 909 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig > >> index fbaed07..735bd7f 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig > >> @@ -240,6 +240,16 @@ config STM32_RPROC > >> > >> This can be either built-in or a loadable module. > >> > >> +config ZYNQMP_R5_REMOTEPROC > >> + tristate "ZynqMP_R5 remoteproc support" > >> + depends on ARM64 && PM && ARCH_ZYNQMP > >> + select RPMSG_VIRTIO > >> + select MAILBOX > >> + select ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX > >> + help > >> + Say y here to support ZynqMP R5 remote processors via the remot= e > >> + processor framework. > >> + > >> endif # REMOTEPROC > >> > >> endmenu > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile > >> b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile index 0effd38..806ac3f 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile > >> @@ -27,5 +27,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_WCNSS_PIL) +=3D qcom= _wcnss_pil.o > >> qcom_wcnss_pil-y +=3D qcom_wcnss.o > >> qcom_wcnss_pil-y +=3D qcom_wcnss_iris.o > >> obj-$(CONFIG_ST_REMOTEPROC) +=3D st_remoteproc.o > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_ZYNQMP_R5_REMOTEPROC) +=3D zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.o > >> obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) +=3D st_slim_rproc.o > >> obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) +=3D stm32_rproc.o > >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c > >> b/drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 0000000..0e4f3ad > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c > >> @@ -0,0 +1,898 @@ > >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > >> +/* > >> + * Zynq R5 Remote Processor driver > >> + * > >> + * Copyright (C) 2019, 2020 Xilinx Inc. Ben Levinsky > >> + > >> + * Copyright (C) 2015 - 2018 Xilinx Inc. > >> + * Copyright (C) 2015 Jason Wu > >> + * > >> + * Based on origin OMAP and Zynq Remote Processor driver > >> + * > >> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Michal Simek > >> + * Copyright (C) 2012 PetaLogix > >> + * Copyright (C) 2011 Texas Instruments, Inc. > >> + * Copyright (C) 2011 Google, Inc. > >> + */ > >> + > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> +#include #include > >> +#include #include #include > >> + #include #include > >> + #include > >> + > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> +#include > >> + > >> +#include "remoteproc_internal.h" > >> + > >> +#define MAX_RPROCS 2 /* Support up to 2 RPU */ > >> +#define MAX_MEM_PNODES 4 /* Max power nodes for one RPU memory i= nstance */ > >> + > >> +#define DEFAULT_FIRMWARE_NAME "rproc-rpu-fw" > >> + > >> +/* PM proc states */ > >> +#define PM_PROC_STATE_ACTIVE 1U > >> + > >> +/* IPI buffer MAX length */ > >> +#define IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX 32U > >> +/* RX mailbox client buffer max length */ > >> +#define RX_MBOX_CLIENT_BUF_MAX (IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX + \ > >> + sizeof(struct zynqmp_ipi_message)) > >> + > >> +static bool autoboot __read_mostly; > >> + > >> +/** > >> + * struct zynqmp_r5_mem - zynqmp rpu memory data > >> + * @pnode_id: TCM power domain ids > >> + * @res: memory resource > >> + * @node: list node > >> + */ > >> +struct zynqmp_r5_mem { > >> + u32 pnode_id[MAX_MEM_PNODES]; > >> + struct resource res; > >> + struct list_head node; > >> +}; > >> + > >> +/** > >> + * struct zynqmp_r5_pdata - zynqmp rpu remote processor private data > >> + * @dev: device of RPU instance > >> + * @rproc: rproc handle > >> + * @pnode_id: RPU CPU power domain id > >> + * @mems: memory resources > >> + * @is_r5_mode_set: indicate if r5 operation mode is set > >> + * @tx_mc: tx mailbox client > >> + * @rx_mc: rx mailbox client > >> + * @tx_chan: tx mailbox channel > >> + * @rx_chan: rx mailbox channel > >> + * @mbox_work: mbox_work for the RPU remoteproc > >> + * @tx_mc_skbs: socket buffers for tx mailbox client > >> + * @rx_mc_buf: rx mailbox client buffer to save the rx message */ > >> +struct zynqmp_r5_pdata { > >> + struct device dev; > >> + struct rproc *rproc; > >> + u32 pnode_id; > >> + struct list_head mems; > >> + bool is_r5_mode_set; > >> + struct mbox_client tx_mc; > >> + struct mbox_client rx_mc; > >> + struct mbox_chan *tx_chan; > >> + struct mbox_chan *rx_chan; > >> + struct work_struct mbox_work; > >> + struct sk_buff_head tx_mc_skbs; > >> + unsigned char rx_mc_buf[RX_MBOX_CLIENT_BUF_MAX]; > >> +}; > >> + > >> +/** > >> + * table of RPUs > >> + */ > >> +struct zynqmp_r5_pdata rpus[MAX_RPROCS]; > >> +/** > >> + * RPU core configuration > >> + */ > >> +enum rpu_oper_mode rpu_mode; > >> + > >> +/* > >> + * r5_set_mode - set RPU operation mode > >> + * @pdata: Remote processor private data > >> + * > >> + * set RPU oepration mode > >> + * > >> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure */ static int > >> +r5_set_mode(struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata) { > >> + u32 val[PAYLOAD_ARG_CNT] =3D {0}, expect, tcm_mode; > >> + struct device *dev =3D &pdata->dev; > >> + int ret; > >> + > >> + expect =3D (u32)rpu_mode; > >> + ret =3D zynqmp_pm_get_rpu_mode(pdata->pnode_id, 0, 0, val); > >> + if (ret < 0) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get RPU oper mode.\n"); > >> + return ret; > >> + } > >> + if (val[0] =3D=3D expect) { > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "RPU mode matches: %x\n", val[0]); > >> + } else { > >> + ret =3D zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(pdata->pnode_id, > >> + expect, 0, val); > >> + if (ret < 0) { > >> + dev_err(dev, > >> + "failed to set RPU oper mode.\n"); > >> + return ret; > >> + } > >> + } > >> + > >> + tcm_mode =3D (expect =3D=3D (u32)PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP) ? > >> + PM_RPU_TCM_COMB : PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT; > >> + ret =3D zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(pdata->pnode_id, tcm_mode, 0, va= l); > >> + if (ret < 0) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to config TCM to %x.\n", > >> + expect); > >> + return ret; > >> + } > >> + pdata->is_r5_mode_set =3D true; > >> + return 0; > >> +} > >> + > >> +/** > >> + * r5_is_running - check if r5 is running > >> + * @pdata: Remote processor private data > >> + * > >> + * check if R5 is running > >> + * > >> + * Return: true if r5 is running, false otherwise */ static bool > >> +r5_is_running(struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata) { > >> + u32 status, requirements, usage; > >> + struct device *dev =3D &pdata->dev; > >> + > >> + if (zynqmp_pm_get_node_status(pdata->pnode_id, > >> + &status, &requirements, &usage)) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get RPU node %d status.\n", > >> + pdata->pnode_id); > >> + return false; > >> + } else if (status !=3D PM_PROC_STATE_ACTIVE) { > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "RPU is not running.\n"); > >> + return false; > >> + } > >> + > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "RPU is running.\n"); > >> + return true; > >> +} > >> + > >> +/* > >> + * ZynqMP R5 remoteproc memory release function */ static int > >> +zynqmp_r5_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc, > >> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) > >> +{ > >> + struct zynqmp_r5_mem *priv; > >> + int i, ret; > >> + struct device *dev =3D &rproc->dev; > >> + > >> + priv =3D mem->priv; > >> + if (!priv) > >> + return 0; > >> + for (i =3D 0; i < MAX_MEM_PNODES; i++) { > >> + if (priv->pnode_id[i]) { > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "%s, pnode %d\n", > >> + __func__, priv->pnode_id[i]); > >> + ret =3D zynqmp_pm_release_node(priv->pnode_id[i])= ; > >> + if (ret < 0) { > >> + dev_err(dev, > >> + "failed to release power node: %u= \n", > >> + priv->pnode_id[i]); > >> + return ret; > >> + } > >> + } else { > >> + break; > >> + } > >> + } > >> + return 0; > >> +} > >> + > >> +/* > >> + * ZynqMP R5 remoteproc operations > >> + */ > >> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) { > >> + struct device *dev =3D rproc->dev.parent; > >> + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata =3D rproc->priv; > >> + enum rpu_boot_mem bootmem; > >> + int ret; > >> + /* Set up R5 if not already setup */ > >> + ret =3D pdata->is_r5_mode_set ? 0 : r5_set_mode(pdata); > > > > Is there any reason why r5_set_mode() has to be done as part of the > > start() function rather than at probe() time? > > > [Ben Levinsky] Can be done instead at probe. Will do. > >> + if (ret) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to set R5 operation mode.\n"); > >> + return ret; > >> + } > >> + if ((rproc->bootaddr & 0xF0000000) =3D=3D 0xF0000000) > >> + bootmem =3D PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC; > >> + else > >> + bootmem =3D PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_LOVEC; > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "RPU boot from %s.", > >> + bootmem =3D=3D PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC ? "OCM" : "TCM"); > >> + ret =3D zynqmp_pm_request_wakeup(pdata->pnode_id, 1, > >> + bootmem, ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_NO)= ; > >> + if (ret < 0) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to boot R5.\n"); > >> + return ret; > >> + } > >> + return 0; > >> +} > >> + > >> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) { > >> + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata =3D rproc->priv; > >> + int ret; > >> + > >> + ret =3D zynqmp_pm_force_powerdown(pdata->pnode_id, > >> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING); > >> + if (ret < 0) { > >> + dev_err(&pdata->dev, "failed to shutdown R5.\n"); > >> + return ret; > >> + } > >> + pdata->is_r5_mode_set =3D false; > > > > Why resetting this to false? If r5_set_mode() needs to be called > > every time the remote processor is booted, why carrying an extra variab= le (pdata->is_r5_mode_set)? > > > [Ben Levinsky] This is because the remote processor can be suspended. So = when stopped this information should be stored. > >> + return 0; > >> +} > >> + > >> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_alloc(struct rproc *rproc, > >> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) { > >> + struct device *dev =3D rproc->dev.parent; > >> + void *va; > >> + > >> + dev_dbg(rproc->dev.parent, "map memory: %pa\n", &mem->dma); > >> + va =3D ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len); > >> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va)) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: %pa+%x\n", > >> + &mem->dma, mem->len); > >> + return -ENOMEM; > >> + } > >> + > >> + /* Update memory entry va */ > >> + mem->va =3D va; > >> + > >> + return 0; > >> +} > >> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc, > >> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem) { > >> + dev_dbg(rproc->dev.parent, "unmap memory: %pa\n", &mem->dma); > >> + iounmap(mem->va); > >> + > >> + return 0; > >> +} > >> + > >> +static int zynqmp_r5_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct > >> +firmware *fw) { > >> + int num_mems, i, ret; > >> + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata =3D rproc->priv; > >> + struct device *dev =3D &pdata->dev; > >> + struct device_node *np =3D dev->of_node; > >> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem; > >> + struct device_node *child; > >> + struct resource rsc; > >> + > >> + num_mems =3D of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "memory-region", NULL= ); > >> + if (num_mems <=3D 0) > >> + return 0; > >> + for (i =3D 0; i < num_mems; i++) { > >> + struct device_node *node; > >> + struct zynqmp_r5_mem *zynqmp_mem; > >> + struct reserved_mem *rmem; > >> + char rproc_name[20]; > >> + > >> + node =3D of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i); > >> + rmem =3D of_reserved_mem_lookup(node); > >> + if (!rmem) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "unable to acquire memory-region\n")= ; > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + } > >> + > >> + if (strstr(node->name, "vdev0buffer")) { > >> + /* Register DMA region */ > >> + mem =3D rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, > >> + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base= , > >> + rmem->size, rmem->base= , > >> + NULL, NULL, > >> + "vdev0buffer"); > > > > Out of sheer curiosity, why did you choose to use > > rproc_mem_entry_init() rather than rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init()? > > After all the vdev0buffer is part of a reserved memory... > [Ben Levinsky] It is because rproc_mem_entry_init also sets DMA and virtu= al address fields. > > > > There is more comments further below. I'm out of time for today, I'll > > continue with the rest of zynmp_r5_parse_fw() tomorrow. > > > > Thanks, > > Mathieu > > > >> + if (!mem) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "unable to initialize memory= -region %s\n", > >> + node->name); > >> + return -ENOMEM; > >> + } > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "parsed %s at %llx\r\n", mem->name, > >> + mem->dma); > >> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); > >> + continue; > >> + } else if (strstr(node->name, "vdev") && > >> + strstr(node->name, "vring")) { > >> + int id, vring_id; > >> + char name[16]; > >> + > >> + id =3D node->name[8] - '0'; > >> + vring_id =3D node->name[14] - '0'; > >> + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev%dvring%d", id, > >> + vring_id); > >> + /* Register vring */ > >> + mem =3D rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, > >> + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base= , > >> + rmem->size, rmem->base= , > >> + zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_al= loc, > >> + zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_re= lease, > >> + name); > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "parsed %s at %llx\r\n", mem->name, > >> + mem->dma); > >> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); > >> + continue; > >> + } else { > >> + mem =3D rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, > >> + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base= , > >> + rmem->size, rmem->base= , > >> + zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_al= loc, > >> + zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_re= lease, > >> + node->name); > >> + > >> + if (!mem) { > >> + dev_err(dev, > >> + "unable to init memory-region %s\= n", > >> + node->name); > >> + return -ENOMEM; > >> + } > >> + mem->of_resm_idx =3D i; > >> + > >> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); > >> + } > >> + } > >> + > >> + /* map TCM */ > >> + for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) { > >> + struct property *prop; > >> + const __be32 *cur; > >> + u32 pnode_id; > >> + void *va; > >> + dma_addr_t dma; > >> + resource_size_t size; > >> + > >> + ret =3D of_address_to_resource(child, 0, &rsc); > >> + > >> + i =3D 0; > >> + of_property_for_each_u32(child, "pnode-id", prop, cur, > >> + pnode_id) { > >> + ret =3D zynqmp_pm_request_node(pnode_id, > >> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0, > >> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING); > >> + if (ret < 0) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to request power nod= e: %u\n", > >> + pnode_id); > >> + return ret; > >> + } > >> + } > >> + size =3D resource_size(&rsc); > >> + va =3D devm_ioremap_wc(dev, rsc.start, size); > >> + if (!va) > >> + return -ENOMEM; > >> + > >> + /* zero out tcm base address */ > >> + if (rsc.start & 0xffe00000) { > >> + rsc.start &=3D 0x000fffff; > >> + /* handle tcm banks 1 a and b > >> + * (0xffe9000 and oxffeb0000) > >> + */ > >> + if (rsc.start & 0x80000) > >> + rsc.start -=3D 0x90000; > >> + } > >> + > >> + dma =3D (dma_addr_t)rsc.start; > >> + mem =3D rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, va, dma, (int)size, rsc= .start, > >> + NULL, zynqmp_r5_mem_release, > >> + rsc.name); > >> + if (!mem) > >> + return -ENOMEM; > >> + > >> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem); > >> + } > >> + > >> + ret =3D rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw); > >> + if (ret =3D=3D -EINVAL) > >> + ret =3D 0; > >> + return ret; > >> +} > >> + > >> +/* kick a firmware */ > >> +static void zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid) { > >> + struct device *dev =3D rproc->dev.parent; > >> + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata =3D rproc->priv; > >> + > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "KICK Firmware to start send messages vqid %d\n", > >> +vqid); > >> + > >> + if (vqid < 0) { > >> + /* If vqid is negative, does not pass the vqid to > >> + * mailbox. As vqid is supposed to be 0 or possive. > >> + * It also gives a way to just kick instead but > >> + * not use the IPI buffer. It is better to provide > >> + * a proper way to pass the short message, which will > >> + * need to sync to upstream first, for now, > >> + * use negative vqid to assume no message will be > >> + * passed with IPI buffer, but just raise interrupt. > >> + * This will be faster as it doesn't need to copy the > >> + * message to the IPI buffer. > >> + * > >> + * It will ignore the return, as failure is due to > >> + * there already kicks in the mailbox queue. > >> + */ > >> + (void)mbox_send_message(pdata->tx_chan, NULL); > >> + } else { > >> + struct sk_buff *skb; > >> + unsigned int skb_len; > >> + struct zynqmp_ipi_message *mb_msg; > >> + int ret; > >> + > >> + skb_len =3D (unsigned int)(sizeof(vqid) + sizeof(mb_msg))= ; > >> + skb =3D alloc_skb(skb_len, GFP_ATOMIC); > >> + if (!skb) { > >> + dev_err(dev, > >> + "Failed to allocate skb to kick remote.\n= "); > >> + return; > >> + } > >> + mb_msg =3D (struct zynqmp_ipi_message *)skb_put(skb, skb_= len); > >> + mb_msg->len =3D sizeof(vqid); > >> + memcpy(mb_msg->data, &vqid, sizeof(vqid)); > >> + skb_queue_tail(&pdata->tx_mc_skbs, skb); > >> + ret =3D mbox_send_message(pdata->tx_chan, mb_msg); > >> + if (ret < 0) { > >> + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to kick remote.\n"); > >> + skb_dequeue_tail(&pdata->tx_mc_skbs); > >> + kfree_skb(skb); > >> + } > >> + } > >> +} > >> + > >> +static struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops =3D { > >> + .start =3D zynqmp_r5_rproc_start, > >> + .stop =3D zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop, > >> + .load =3D rproc_elf_load_segments, > >> + .parse_fw =3D zynqmp_r5_parse_fw, > >> + .find_loaded_rsc_table =3D rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table, > >> + .sanity_check =3D rproc_elf_sanity_check, > >> + .get_boot_addr =3D rproc_elf_get_boot_addr, > >> + .kick =3D zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +/* zynqmp_r5_mem_probe() - probes RPU TCM memory device > >> + * @pdata: pointer to the RPU remoteproc private data > >> + * @node: pointer to the memory node > >> + * > >> + * Function to retrieve resources for RPU TCM memory device. > >> + */ > >> +static int zynqmp_r5_mem_probe(struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata, > >> + struct device_node *node) > >> +{ > >> + struct device *dev; > >> + struct zynqmp_r5_mem *mem; > >> + int ret; > >> + struct property *prop; > >> + const __be32 *cur; > >> + u32 val; > >> + int i =3D 0; > >> + > >> + dev =3D &pdata->dev; > >> + mem =3D devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mem), GFP_KERNEL); > >> + if (!mem) > >> + return -ENOMEM; > >> + ret =3D of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &mem->res); > >> + if (ret < 0) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get resource of memory %s", > >> + of_node_full_name(node)); > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + } > >> + > >> + /* Get the power domain id */ > >> + if (of_find_property(node, "pnode-id", NULL)) { > >> + of_property_for_each_u32(node, "pnode-id", prop, cur, val= ) > >> + mem->pnode_id[i++] =3D val; > >> + } > >> + list_add_tail(&mem->node, &pdata->mems); > >> + return 0; > >> +} > >> + > >> +/** > >> + * zynqmp_r5_release() - ZynqMP R5 device release function > >> + * @dev: pointer to the device struct of ZynqMP R5 > >> + * > >> + * Function to release ZynqMP R5 device. > >> + */ > >> +static void zynqmp_r5_release(struct device *dev) { > >> + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata; > >> + struct rproc *rproc; > >> + struct sk_buff *skb; > >> + > >> + pdata =3D dev_get_drvdata(dev); > >> + rproc =3D pdata->rproc; > >> + if (rproc) { > >> + rproc_del(rproc); > >> + rproc_free(rproc); > >> + } > >> + if (pdata->tx_chan) > >> + mbox_free_channel(pdata->tx_chan); > >> + if (pdata->rx_chan) > >> + mbox_free_channel(pdata->rx_chan); > >> + /* Discard all SKBs */ > >> + while (!skb_queue_empty(&pdata->tx_mc_skbs)) { > >> + skb =3D skb_dequeue(&pdata->tx_mc_skbs); > >> + kfree_skb(skb); > >> + } > >> + > >> + put_device(dev->parent); > >> +} > >> + > >> +/** > >> + * event_notified_idr_cb() - event notified idr callback > >> + * @id: idr id > >> + * @ptr: pointer to idr private data > >> + * @data: data passed to idr_for_each callback > >> + * > >> + * Pass notification to remoteproc virtio > >> + * > >> + * Return: 0. having return is to satisfy the idr_for_each() function > >> + * pointer input argument requirement. > >> + **/ > >> +static int event_notified_idr_cb(int id, void *ptr, void *data) { > >> + struct rproc *rproc =3D data; > >> + > >> + (void)rproc_vq_interrupt(rproc, id); > >> + return 0; > >> +} > >> + > >> +/** > >> + * handle_event_notified() - remoteproc notification work funciton > >> + * @work: pointer to the work structure > >> + * > >> + * It checks each registered remoteproc notify IDs. > >> + */ > >> +static void handle_event_notified(struct work_struct *work) { > >> + struct rproc *rproc; > >> + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata; > >> + > >> + pdata =3D container_of(work, struct zynqmp_r5_pdata, mbox_work); > >> + > >> + (void)mbox_send_message(pdata->rx_chan, NULL); > >> + rproc =3D pdata->rproc; > >> + /* > >> + * We only use IPI for interrupt. The firmware side may or may > >> + * not write the notifyid when it trigger IPI. > >> + * And thus, we scan through all the registered notifyids. > >> + */ > >> + idr_for_each(&rproc->notifyids, event_notified_idr_cb, rproc); } > >> + > >> +/** > >> + * zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb() - Receive channel mailbox callback > >> + * @cl: mailbox client > >> + * @mssg: message pointer > >> + * > >> + * It will schedule the R5 notification work. > >> + */ > >> +static void zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb(struct mbox_client *cl, void *mssg) { > >> + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata; > >> + > >> + pdata =3D container_of(cl, struct zynqmp_r5_pdata, rx_mc); > >> + if (mssg) { > >> + struct zynqmp_ipi_message *ipi_msg, *buf_msg; > >> + size_t len; > >> + > >> + ipi_msg =3D (struct zynqmp_ipi_message *)mssg; > >> + buf_msg =3D (struct zynqmp_ipi_message *)pdata->rx_mc_buf= ; > >> + len =3D (ipi_msg->len >=3D IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX) ? > >> + IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX : ipi_msg->len; > >> + buf_msg->len =3D len; > >> + memcpy(buf_msg->data, ipi_msg->data, len); > >> + } > >> + schedule_work(&pdata->mbox_work); > >> +} > >> + > >> +/** > >> + * zynqmp_r5_mb_tx_done() - Request has been sent to the remote > >> + * @cl: mailbox client > >> + * @mssg: pointer to the message which has been sent > >> + * @r: status of last TX - OK or error > >> + * > >> + * It will be called by the mailbox framework when the last TX has do= ne. > >> + */ > >> +static void zynqmp_r5_mb_tx_done(struct mbox_client *cl, void *mssg, > >> +int r) { > >> + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata; > >> + struct sk_buff *skb; > >> + > >> + if (!mssg) > >> + return; > >> + pdata =3D container_of(cl, struct zynqmp_r5_pdata, tx_mc); > >> + skb =3D skb_dequeue(&pdata->tx_mc_skbs); > >> + kfree_skb(skb); > >> +} > >> + > >> +/** > >> + * zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox() - Setup mailboxes > >> + * > >> + * @pdata: pointer to the ZynqMP R5 processor platform data > >> + * @node: pointer of the device node > >> + * > >> + * Function to setup mailboxes to talk to RPU. > >> + * > >> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure. > >> + */ > >> +static int zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox(struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata, > >> + struct device_node *node) > >> +{ > >> + struct device *dev =3D &pdata->dev; > >> + struct mbox_client *mclient; > >> + > >> + /* Setup TX mailbox channel client */ > >> + mclient =3D &pdata->tx_mc; > >> + mclient->dev =3D dev; > >> + mclient->rx_callback =3D NULL; > >> + mclient->tx_block =3D false; > >> + mclient->knows_txdone =3D false; > >> + mclient->tx_done =3D zynqmp_r5_mb_tx_done; > >> + > >> + /* Setup TX mailbox channel client */ > >> + mclient =3D &pdata->rx_mc; > >> + mclient->dev =3D dev; > >> + mclient->rx_callback =3D zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb; > >> + mclient->tx_block =3D false; > >> + mclient->knows_txdone =3D false; > >> + > >> + INIT_WORK(&pdata->mbox_work, handle_event_notified); > >> + > >> + /* Request TX and RX channels */ > >> + pdata->tx_chan =3D mbox_request_channel_byname(&pdata->tx_mc, "tx= "); > >> + if (IS_ERR(pdata->tx_chan)) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to request mbox tx channel.\n"); > >> + pdata->tx_chan =3D NULL; > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + } > >> + pdata->rx_chan =3D mbox_request_channel_byname(&pdata->rx_mc, "rx= "); > >> + if (IS_ERR(pdata->rx_chan)) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to request mbox rx channel.\n"); > >> + pdata->rx_chan =3D NULL; > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + } > >> + skb_queue_head_init(&pdata->tx_mc_skbs); > >> + return 0; > >> +} > >> + > >> +/** > >> + * zynqmp_r5_probe() - Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node > >> + * @pdata: pointer to the ZynqMP R5 processor platform data > >> + * @pdev: parent RPU domain platform device > >> + * @node: pointer of the device node > >> + * > >> + * Function to retrieve the information of the ZynqMP R5 device node. > >> + * > >> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure. > >> + */ > >> +static int zynqmp_r5_probe(struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata, > >> + struct platform_device *pdev, > >> + struct device_node *node) > >> +{ > >> + struct device *dev =3D &pdata->dev; > >> + struct rproc *rproc; > >> + struct device_node *nc; > >> + int ret; > >> + > >> + /* Create device for ZynqMP R5 device */ > >> + dev->parent =3D &pdev->dev; > >> + dev->release =3D zynqmp_r5_release; > >> + dev->of_node =3D node; > >> + dev_set_name(dev, "%s", of_node_full_name(node)); > >> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, pdata); > >> + ret =3D device_register(dev); > >> + if (ret) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register device.\n"); > >> + return ret; > >> + } > >> + get_device(&pdev->dev); > >> + > >> + /* Allocate remoteproc instance */ > >> + rproc =3D rproc_alloc(dev, dev_name(dev), &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops, N= ULL, 0); > >> + if (!rproc) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "rproc allocation failed.\n"); > >> + ret =3D -ENOMEM; > >> + goto error; > >> + } > >> + rproc->auto_boot =3D autoboot; > >> + pdata->rproc =3D rproc; > >> + rproc->priv =3D pdata; > >> + > >> + /* > >> + * The device has not been spawned from a device tree, so > >> + * arch_setup_dma_ops has not been called, thus leaving > >> + * the device with dummy DMA ops. > >> + * Fix this by inheriting the parent's DMA ops and mask. > >> + */ > >> + rproc->dev.dma_mask =3D pdev->dev.dma_mask; > >> + set_dma_ops(&rproc->dev, get_dma_ops(&pdev->dev)); > >> + > >> + /* Probe R5 memory devices */ > >> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdata->mems); > >> + for_each_available_child_of_node(node, nc) { > >> + ret =3D zynqmp_r5_mem_probe(pdata, nc); > >> + if (ret) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to probe memory %s.\n", > >> + of_node_full_name(nc)); > >> + goto error; > >> + } > >> + } > >> + > >> + /* Set up DMA mask */ > >> + ret =3D dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); > >> + if (ret) { > >> + dev_warn(dev, "dma_set_coherent_mask failed: %d\n", ret); > >> + /* If DMA is not configured yet, try to configure it. */ > >> + ret =3D of_dma_configure(dev, node, true); > >> + if (ret) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to configure DMA.\n"); > >> + goto error; > >> + } > >> + } > >> + > >> + /* Get R5 power domain node */ > >> + ret =3D of_property_read_u32(node, "pnode-id", &pdata->pnode_id); > >> + if (ret) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get power node id.\n"); > >> + goto error; > >> + } > >> + > >> + /* Check if R5 is running */ > >> + if (r5_is_running(pdata)) { > >> + atomic_inc(&rproc->power); > >> + rproc->state =3D RPROC_RUNNING; > >> + } > > > > How does this work when state_store() returns an error if rproc->state > > =3D=3D RPROC_RUNNING? As such the remote processor is running but ther= e > > is no way to attach to it. As I requested during my previous review, > > please hold off on supporting scenarios where the remote processor is > > already running when the driver is probe. We are working on introducin= g that in the remoteproc core. > [Ben Levinsky] Will do. Ok I will leave it as a FIXME for now > > > >> + > >> + if (!of_get_property(dev->of_node, "mboxes", NULL)) { > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "no mailboxes.\n"); > >> + goto error; > >> + } else { > >> + ret =3D zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox(pdata, node); > >> + if (ret < 0) > >> + goto error; > >> + } > >> + > >> + /* Add R5 remoteproc */ > >> + ret =3D rproc_add(rproc); > >> + if (ret) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "rproc registration failed\n"); > >> + goto error; > >> + } > >> + return 0; > >> +error: > >> + if (pdata->rproc) > >> + rproc_free(pdata->rproc); > >> + pdata->rproc =3D NULL; > >> + device_unregister(dev); > >> + put_device(&pdev->dev); > >> + return ret; > >> +} > >> + > >> +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> +{ > >> + const unsigned char *prop; > >> + int ret, i; > >> + struct device *dev =3D &pdev->dev; > >> + struct device_node *nc; > >> + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata; > >> + > >> + pdata =3D devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL); > >> + if (!pdata) > >> + return -ENOMEM; > >> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pdata); > >> + > >> + prop =3D of_get_property(dev->of_node, "core_conf", NULL); > >> + if (!prop) { > >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "core_conf is not used.\n"); > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + } > > > > This should be the same as what Texas Instrument is doing, i.e: > > lockstep-mode =3D <1> > > > > That way: > > > > 1) The wheel is not re-invented. > > 2) An 'enum rpu_oper_mode' can be used directly. > > 3) No need for string comparison. > > So, for my next version, I am planning to change this "lockstep-mode" to = a ti,cluster-mode property (still an enum/integer). We have a new SoC famil= y coming up wherein we are supporting a unique mode called "Single CPU" mod= e which is not the same as LockStep, and I will be finding the current "loc= kstep-mode" property limiting there. > > [Ben Levinsky] will do, this will be in the revision. Thanks for the heads-up Suman. Ben, based on the above it is probably best to introduce a "qcomm,cluster-mode" property. > regards > Suman > > > > >> + > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "RPU core_conf: %s\n", prop); > >> + if (!strcmp(prop, "split")) { > >> + rpu_mode =3D PM_RPU_MODE_SPLIT; > >> + } else if (!strcmp(prop, "lockstep")) { > >> + rpu_mode =3D PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP; > >> + } else { > >> + dev_err(dev, > >> + "Invalid core_conf mode provided - %s , %d\n", > >> + prop, (int)rpu_mode); > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + } > >> + > >> + i =3D 0; > > > > This can be done when the variable is declared above. > > > >> + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev->of_node, nc) { > >> + ret =3D zynqmp_r5_probe(&rpus[i], pdev, nc); > >> + if (ret) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to probe rpu %s.\n", > >> + of_node_full_name(nc)); > >> + return ret; > >> + } > >> + i++; > >> + } > >> + > >> + return 0; > >> +} > >> + > >> +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > >> +{ > >> + int i; > >> + > >> + for (i =3D 0; i < MAX_RPROCS; i++) { > >> + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata =3D &rpus[i]; > >> + struct rproc *rproc; > >> + > >> + rproc =3D pdata->rproc; > >> + if (rproc) { > >> + rproc_del(rproc); > >> + rproc_free(rproc); > >> + pdata->rproc =3D NULL; > >> + } > >> + if (pdata->tx_chan) { > >> + mbox_free_channel(pdata->tx_chan); > >> + pdata->tx_chan =3D NULL; > >> + } > >> + if (pdata->rx_chan) { > >> + mbox_free_channel(pdata->rx_chan); > >> + pdata->rx_chan =3D NULL; > >> + } > >> + > >> + device_unregister(&pdata->dev); > >> + } > >> + > >> + return 0; > >> +} > >> + > >> +/* Match table for OF platform binding */ static const struct > >> +of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] =3D { > >> + { .compatible =3D "xlnx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc-1.0", }, > >> + { /* end of list */ }, > >> +}; > >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match); > >> + > >> +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver =3D { > >> + .probe =3D zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe, > >> + .remove =3D zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_remove, > >> + .driver =3D { > >> + .name =3D "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc", > >> + .of_match_table =3D zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match, > >> + }, > >> +}; > >> +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver); > >> + > >> +module_param_named(autoboot, autoboot, bool, 0444); > >> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(autoboot, > >> + "enable | disable autoboot. (default: true)"); > >> + > >> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ben Levinsky "); > >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ZynqMP R5 remote > >> +processor control driver"); > >> -- > >> 2.7.4 > >> >