Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <1591724039.5567.33.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] IMA: Add audit log for failure conditions
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
        Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc:     Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Tue, 09 Jun 2020 13:33:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20200609171555.itbllvtgjdanbbk7@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
References: <20200608215343.4491-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
         <27448076.Og45N0Lxmj@x2>
         <ada45440-aefd-a4b2-2a3b-c012872e86cb@linux.microsoft.com>
         <3776526.Vj75JV9fuy@x2>
         <518a51b7-6c8d-f55f-c73a-b15abae8e0af@linux.microsoft.com>
         <20200609171555.itbllvtgjdanbbk7@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Richard,

On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 13:15 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 2020-06-09 10:00, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:

> If it is added, it should be appended to the end of the record since it
> is an existing record format, then in the case of res=1, errno= should
> still be present (not swing in and out) and just contain zero.  (Or
> another value if there is a non-fatal warning?)

Thank you for the clarification.

Mimi