Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1587735561.git.Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com> <c006813f8fc3052eef97d5216e4f31829d7cd10b.1587735561.git.Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>
 <SN6PR08MB5693C397D88D16EC43E85490DBD00@SN6PR08MB5693.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
 <BN8PR12MB3266D1F9B038EF821FA8D503D3AD0@BN8PR12MB3266.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
 <BN7PR08MB56847531D0EC603DD2C7B349DBAD0@BN7PR08MB5684.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
 <BN8PR12MB32664256580771FA9102EB14D3AA0@BN8PR12MB3266.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN8PR12MB32664256580771FA9102EB14D3AA0@BN8PR12MB3266.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
From:   Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:09:48 +0530
Message-ID: <CAGOxZ50qPoC0HPUdTiOzA+NhTo5FRZVk01uq40AaDNn4JkHi3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: ufs: Allow UFS 3.0 as a valid version
To:     Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>
Cc:     "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
        "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>,
        Joao Lima <Joao.Lima@synopsys.com>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Jose

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 1:44 PM Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com> wrote:
>
> From: Bean Huo (beanhuo) <beanhuo@micron.com>
> Date: Apr/29/2020, 13:59:08 (UTC+00:00)
> > > Probably. I think we can leave them or change the dev_err to a dev_warn.
> > > This way we have logs in case someone is using a non-supported version.
> > >
> > > What do you think ?
> > >
> > Hi, Jose
> > Seems after your patch, all of current released UFS control versions will be supported except the
> > version suffix is non-zero. Right?
>
> I think we cover all versions with this patch.
>
Are you still on this?

> ---
> Thanks,
> Jose Miguel Abreu


-- 
Regards,
Alim