Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <21c42f96b7f2b105e863a9f4ddf87f4e95a86393.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Recommend blocklist/allowlist instead of
 blacklist/whitelist
From:   Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To:     SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        apw@canonical.com
Cc:     colin.king@canonical.com, sj38.park@gmail.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:06:17 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20200610065223.29894-1-sjpark@amazon.com>
References: <20200610065223.29894-1-sjpark@amazon.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.2-0ubuntu1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 08:52 +0200, SeongJae Park wrote:
> This patchset 1) adds support of deprecated terms in the 'checkpatch.pl'
> and 2) set the 'blacklist' and 'whitelist' as deprecated with
> replacement suggestion of 'blocklist' and 'allowlist', because the
> suggestions are incontrovertible, doesn't make people hurt, and more
> self-explanatory.

I don't care for the politics of the patch myself.

From a technical perspective, it may be better to
have a single routine for both spelling and whatever
this is called.