Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp525740ybg; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:02:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwm4WS4WWeJEmIdTns0AgitHjGRhxnu2WwZSzDZWKcffdxynueO8U6ltrfL5VFyv6xgN8aa X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c15a:: with SMTP id r26mr2472939edp.21.1591797761154; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:02:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591797761; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vWq3PZH+elUWK3vJIWBf3J+TN4Yq6RON2kSnpAjn8R15IbyuP7FNJtw9gI/YmbgXiV QtgYmyTRvkxEvNWn5GW55SmGtYvopi2AxeHw4S4fIXxEJu7OmwF08LHyPlWOUm9OP6oN wD0neVg/38KiUF3LSJfWk5S7UWCeWIeYxYiWLvscOqtD92AUPMWic3WIILnbSQHbKubI bgqv1UDL1p2Z1ZSp+hZXUkVxBw9ug03P0Enhfxlf/S7FhiRq9YdBwvC7BwWyzcJ1LAVz D9JcNpSOA2r2F/wwD3K33xCyGV6r85MMZ6xMEm73Blc2mFpidKWuxxMFqknlhslrPxQW pdYA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=EimU5qjS08aU616XXVkXi3/FClh4rIyli69pizXKtfs=; b=jXTWZF7B4usc6PPd7tWN8/bl0hJTrKh/cjkuPsN9RCMV9aOT2mTSNatx+cihCyTTau RKt0ihilx2gWRK4CEDDpgLCP2x1SYoph1wjncwMFBsiEDFT+fdN9T4H5PMntgy8zE5k5 qhaeiN4wvn9OT1loymzXUVmoSRaWpUzSsJdPIbkUt1mdCppLcCo+ggseZBnZd0eiRRWp WFLqmymQ8Y1PxKk6IQVPM3NPIh7UM8OurVEBVtHb9RVkKzvMUkdqnhg8zKFeTje7G1Gb Sv5Qd7pwwhjaa9hCJu4244ALA0jucncbvhxS36x/s0dXY3ut1X9m/3Y+FRfCUyn3pwJl t2Uw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g21si10203016edj.35.2020.06.10.07.02.05; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726783AbgFJIcu (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 04:32:50 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:54880 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726699AbgFJIcu (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 04:32:50 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94771F1; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 01:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.37.12.97]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37EC23F6CF; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 01:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:32:37 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Rob Herring Cc: Will Deacon , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: Add ARM PSA FF binding for non-secure VM partitions Message-ID: <20200610083237.GA4867@bogus> References: <20200601094512.50509-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20200601094512.50509-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20200609223551.GA1620273@bogus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200609223551.GA1620273@bogus> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 04:35:51PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 10:45:10AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Add devicetree bindings for a Arm PSA FF-A compliant non-secure partition > > at virtual interface(VMs). > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,psa-ffa.txt | 47 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,psa-ffa.txt > > I'm hoping this goes away if the firmware is discoverable, but if not DT > bindings are DT schema now. > Yes, consider it gone. I introduced it to couple of reasons both of which are now irrelevant. We may revisit this if we need it for Rx/Tx buffer information. The KVM host may need the binding, this was for the guests/ partitions as Will has already mentioned. -- Regards, Sudeep