Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp770163ybg; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:15:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXJOowPfxZ39nYfflFPBuPyP69SPyIfxYsQc6PQWTd+sNsLWTZtpBEiXEowXwzWUaIhi7c X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7d97:: with SMTP id v23mr4861807ejo.199.1591820146331; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:15:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591820146; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=S/mfIWv5kGXkOPsUB2nkdUhSlywBF+IDw0nuqbLECpB9YOK2z0UbCps0yYMBkebmF4 t5DKLOUBw1aGRqEQjnKI4b2QZN1g/Gnu1tQmldZhCk6r5FU8NyR7W34PnWJD0JEoxf/x feHTdasLCYN/CFAMMHU1fXXDmpedhPzMInfOaZke6Hl1EaW6N+kpFWhO/ag9c4XbzF4D EVm93yXFZnoBaD/+ozuD8pytlIJ9zLlPgI9/CRaSvo4mQ00k9sFxaQhWemK0cdBxN90h hOJeqhkiqrMmedTFjLMvcwdba3v8qWbKa1yUdYkvFa0c8CNA5HaXq7M3WFa6gG6Z/Gw7 1KYw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=Wu1KxK3oWDaDyFouCR1IJCWRCCZuOnfSKhmf+rK5Zxw=; b=nBwwpGH2v7r/NYR9Ebfg7Ie0AiVyNqxZ/A2gCgvben2OlGhq5Z+KvU41eNzAJN6EU4 k8uy+6VnQqKdEnTUabJQciUsGM2r4Oxdi+KJ71JzosUwH9ANU+qVrrnEMbvjOvtpw2JO DfZTuQToJXqdlJ9jKDUCKlPe6BwMiiIjHqUPUwD/G9eiPkbWS888oAo4dgnkbL/K7lxr /ui3Ih1h5FxL8iPNNum0tE2nhj13AtRGq1vXZHKcFDA+8BtlfCkgdahinfI5jAV8FKEa c0ovZlzKT3i56UJRFKqFCwnHU8lZoVEER49pD6XXrosuhLV92EVX4Cd2trp1AT5UvNZZ y6/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=oMmr18e2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r10si639547ejj.249.2020.06.10.13.15.20; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=oMmr18e2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729367AbgFJRKh (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:10:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60404 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729340AbgFJRKh (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:10:37 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1042.google.com (mail-pj1-x1042.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1042]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B32B1C03E96F for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1042.google.com with SMTP id i4so1148669pjd.0 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:10:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Wu1KxK3oWDaDyFouCR1IJCWRCCZuOnfSKhmf+rK5Zxw=; b=oMmr18e2vlsUwaIbxh6CowxNZ5fXzjfgmkFL2R2jM2RUlcV/0jnVTduaVrPaFnDGs9 QDuR/bYJP+8NCw01k5v6u7s7UrHLS9i8UYMPU93hCzQfrKP3xRzfjAw0OBDtnOAgcdtQ 7KVFiv3APJf/AYGrTCrcwRMVTg4Dwe/DNZI54= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Wu1KxK3oWDaDyFouCR1IJCWRCCZuOnfSKhmf+rK5Zxw=; b=C5CwHdHd7jQ1xd8bujgwr3jnX4pCFBigidrRX4DbFclR78fJ+l+XSBxK+CoFw61S98 bxlO6PJX3rOsTYbXKpEA3DRR5wyHKBc8HJ+HC7Q0MygRt8mzxthMvq1zUEeaux7ivTMc Q4jltwsi+2S2MpY1SUoXV2mEILLc9Vqi72mJaaS5HrY9ep7dbw9rPUDXUB50jmPV/iko NppXEOqTn31k9a9UwltY7CFaM6tyUOfMScjgUsDCyhqCkuqkc8Ixvh0+aEBX0RYnFPgu F2p2NuzIKTT0yD1zdp4N1IIoioEIpDqQARzx/7HJ51wngesUcNpnK25hWeowKYxTkiEC C/hg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533/qyKFLkxWHivpo76eHWXWDDoz0stOuobxu/SpfoY7Ir7wtx61 p0Yv3PMcIqg+JA6wvpnIF0pi6g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7487:: with SMTP id h7mr3828645pll.155.1591809036089; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h3sm484466pfr.2.2020.06.10.10.10.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:10:33 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: Sargun Dhillon Cc: Christian Brauner , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, Giuseppe Scrivano , Robert Sesek , Chris Palmer , Jann Horn , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Daniel Wagner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matt Denton , John Fastabend , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Al Viro , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] fs, net: Standardize on file_receive helper to move fds across processes Message-ID: <202006101005.D1D19EE@keescook> References: <20200604012452.vh33nufblowuxfed@wittgenstein> <202006031845.F587F85A@keescook> <20200604125226.eztfrpvvuji7cbb2@wittgenstein> <20200605075435.GA3345@ircssh-2.c.rugged-nimbus-611.internal> <202006091235.930519F5B@keescook> <20200609200346.3fthqgfyw3bxat6l@wittgenstein> <202006091346.66B79E07@keescook> <037A305F-B3F8-4CFA-B9F8-CD4C9EF9090B@ubuntu.com> <202006092227.D2D0E1F8F@keescook> <20200610081237.GA23425@ircssh-2.c.rugged-nimbus-611.internal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200610081237.GA23425@ircssh-2.c.rugged-nimbus-611.internal> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 08:12:38AM +0000, Sargun Dhillon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 10:27:54PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 11:27:30PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > On June 9, 2020 10:55:42 PM GMT+02:00, Kees Cook wrote: > > > >LOL. And while we were debating this, hch just went and cleaned stuff up: > > > > > > > >2618d530dd8b ("net/scm: cleanup scm_detach_fds") > > > > > > > >So, um, yeah, now my proposal is actually even closer to what we already > > > >have there. We just add the replace_fd() logic to __scm_install_fd() and > > > >we're done with it. > > > > > > Cool, you have a link? :) > > > > How about this: > > > Thank you. > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/commit/?h=devel/seccomp/addfd/v3.1&id=bb94586b9e7cc88e915536c2e9fb991a97b62416 > > > > -- > > Kees Cook > > + if (ufd) { > + error = put_user(new_fd, ufd); > + if (error) { > + put_unused_fd(new_fd); > + return error; > + } > + } > I'm fairly sure this introduces a bug[1] if the user does: Ah, sorry, I missed this before I posted my "v3.2" tree link. > > struct msghdr msg = {}; > struct cmsghdr *cmsg; > struct iovec io = { > .iov_base = &c, > .iov_len = 1, > }; > > msg.msg_iov = &io; > msg.msg_iovlen = 1; > msg.msg_control = NULL; > msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(buf); > > recvmsg(sock, &msg, 0); > > They will have the FD installed, no error message, but FD number wont be written > to memory AFAICT. If two FDs are passed, you will get an efault. They will both > be installed, but memory wont be written to. Maybe instead of 0, make it a > poison pointer, or -1 instead? Hmmm. I see what you mean -- SCM_RIGHTS effectively _requires_ a valid __user pointer, so we can't use NULL to indicate "we don't want this". I'm not sure I can pass this through directly at all, though. > ----- > As an aside, all of this junk should be dropped: > + ret = get_user(size, &uaddfd->size); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + ret = copy_struct_from_user(&addfd, sizeof(addfd), uaddfd, size); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > > and the size member of the seccomp_notif_addfd struct. I brought this up > off-list with Tycho that ioctls have the size of the struct embedded in them. We > should just use that. The ioctl definition is based on this[2]: > #define _IOC(dir,type,nr,size) \ > (((dir) << _IOC_DIRSHIFT) | \ > ((type) << _IOC_TYPESHIFT) | \ > ((nr) << _IOC_NRSHIFT) | \ > ((size) << _IOC_SIZESHIFT)) > > > We should just use copy_from_user for now. In the future, we can either > introduce new ioctl names for new structs, or extract the size dynamically from > the ioctl (and mask it out on the switch statement in seccomp_notify_ioctl. Okay, sounds good. > ---- > +#define SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_ADDFD SECCOMP_IOR(3, \ > + struct seccomp_notif_addfd) > > Lastly, what I believe to be a small mistake, it should be SECCOMP_IOW, based on > the documentation in ioctl.h -- "_IOW means userland is writing and kernel is > reading." Okay, let me tweak things and get a "v3.3". ;) -- Kees Cook