Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:26:16 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Vaibhav Agarwal <vaibhav.sr@gmail.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
        Mark Greer <mgreer@animalcreek.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Enable Greybus Audio codec driver
Message-ID: <20200611082616.GA4671@sirena.org.uk>
References: <cover.1591802243.git.vaibhav.sr@gmail.com>
 <20200610173711.GK5005@sirena.org.uk>
 <20200610182322.GC21465@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200610182322.GC21465@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 11:53:24PM +0530, Vaibhav Agarwal wrote:

> With patch#6 in this series, I'm proposing some of the (dummy) helper=20
> APIs required to link DAPM DAI widgets for the GB Audio modules=20
> added/removed dynamically.

> Eventually, I would like to propose relevant changes in snd-soc APIs to=
=20
> enable dynamic linking of DAI widgets for the modules added and=20
> remove/free component controls for the module removed.

> I'm seeking your opinion on the proposed changes. And as per the=20
> recommendation I'm sharing the changes with ASoC mailing list as well.

These are proposed incremental changes to an out of tree driver that has
never been submitted.  I don't know what the current code looks like,
what it's supposed to be doing or anything like that so I've no idea
what's going on or why.

> Kindly suggest me the preferred way to follow on this thread.=20

This is effectively out of tree code, until someone submits it properly
I'm not sure it's useful to submit incremental patches upstream.

--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl7h6qcACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9ClMQf5AfzPskdM7GJn5Lf8DIJciRGrA08Te9rvY3eabhXU4aiMCp9lBF1prenp
QGLxYB+mW1bdfMOqVwzmQlVKZ6OtZ9IinlKhqWn6cea9eWK3aGo8uaGjp3H8tJp1
HYpMyoBfCedLFxL/YGlhxn2yj5k++pPtDS+6NwEYuec1FV3k46hzKfmzr5BJzgcp
LYLZT8n/3S+AJoCb7NRY07Ptz1+Qev16y+Ta45oolFnFceewDJ+jxt4w7+BLVwJt
rAchPXSGY0SgPhSDu/hPcKODETZ7O2UloPGht/R5SG8Fzabg6ngJqujyawqzDddL
TYo4fg6SQ2NWig21RJ9+2byMqNbgPg==
=yLco
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v--