Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932714AbWCVUlg (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:41:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932715AbWCVUlg (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:41:36 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:27789 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932714AbWCVUlf (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:41:35 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Ashok Raj Subject: Re: Linux v2.6.16 Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:40:00 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Peter Williams , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Pavel Machek References: <200603221911.06576.rjw@sisk.pl> <20060322102717.A12901@unix-os.sc.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20060322102717.A12901@unix-os.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603222140.00912.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1398 Lines: 35 On Wednesday 22 March 2006 19:27, Ashok Raj wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 07:11:05PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > It might help to explain why this would break your swsusp with SMP work? > > > > On SMP systems swsusp (suspend in general, AFAICT) uses the disable_nonboot_cpus() > > function defined in kernel/power/smp.c, which calls cpu_down() that is only > > defined if CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is set. We can't suspend and resume SMP systems > > reliably without it. > > > I understand the needs of swsusp, but no one took away CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU away... > just that you need to also enable CONFIG_GENERICARCH to get it to work reliably, and > not see that printk... nothing else.. > > Iam still confused why you think swsusp wont work... > > with that patch, try > > CONFIG_X86_PC=n > CONFIG_GENERICARCH=y > CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y Well, there's nothing like CONFIG_GENERICARCH on x86_64 or I'm obviously missing something. :-) On x86_64 I can choose between X86_PC and X86_VSMP and I'm not sure I'd like to set X86_VSMP just in order to be able to suspend a box with a dual-core CPU. IMHO that would be over the top. Greetings, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/