Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp709749ybg; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:27:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwRuE+2I5efo6n0v2sGhYhA5bGV6q8Cct+65rBgQpF89U60OxqGErLgEw3Y7EAtrjrH0FaX X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1917:: with SMTP id a23mr14438310eje.181.1591990071113; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:27:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591990071; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=naJJmOtyJ29/7aUXRioUGXljiCZPUKDhs3SIN3PfSyYJ/sQrm0gIlwqLeTL6VAjiA9 JLp6beCd1I9lZ7Ojr8IEeo6h+9DFKeZYyaZr8dxw1gmzFYJDqEwKA1t6Ntw6vpbV4NPO DS+ZijXWqe10KUgt10l8UoUzGxwimAq4XyPuuCg7p8p95O1WIe6QiwRXZ+LDOZTaoF4W ZyeF4Wnir4jOA9cqvLYQl5GIBmiWa+Q/2iyZoCFhkTv7/wMgByDGxGAFUk13D4CC6Oj+ +lCS1GEgVWo4pgMsXEGK0Ilp8M8wooTeEvjG/+N7USvWah6NZIlyK5F2rD6low1LSrpE LFNQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=xhKX38FLQX/DtyWx5+GF5wutW3h6qW7qortmjIibWM8=; b=oh9bJA7UM96owkIZ5SHxRGLPhoPPlO1utH3BTTvv/WYhaIIC8ZzKrTpvZPo7CA7pwA BwhvOIegrgSz0iJMuef+N/nQ5fJilWq59zIwcMMfYYqc5qftBdNW8dBRwID97BFrvkQz /fougb+YY0UBTilOr1Gcgb3NYl9ZpXg5EBQhkJIjOJI2weGzIII3+t1q+fMvvdVbF5hu zzbK3Z2UHi+RHxUO48I/58FA0mVTI7ZyvBOVOy37o1K9k2+Vt9xVU6biDZrKjuIs0l5z /Q8das/3FTf0EGN/MmZUadzs7Pq/ox35XT66vJyD4ZIKWLnMqxgNosdsUWxdJu6cW5zN +8zQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id mh21si4529045ejb.181.2020.06.12.12.27.28; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:27:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726377AbgFLTZf (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 15:25:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45142 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726478AbgFLTZe (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2020 15:25:34 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B1ADC03E96F; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:25:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jjpIn-00030f-Le; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 21:25:21 +0200 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E09E0100F5A; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 21:25:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: paulmck@kernel.org Cc: LKML , rcu@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lutomirski , X86 ML , Frederic Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt , Joel Fernandes , Mathieu Desnoyers , Will Deacon , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH x86/entry: Force rcu_irq_enter() when in idle task In-Reply-To: <20200612191921.GA18255@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> References: <20200611235305.GA32342@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <871rmkzcc8.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87wo4cxubv.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20200612174953.GA19188@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20200612191921.GA18255@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 21:25:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87r1ukxf1b.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Paul E. McKenney" writes: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 10:49:53AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >> I will therefore address this issue in a follow-on patch. > > I should add that -your- patch from yesterday did -not- cause this > problem, in case that is of interest. So I still can add it back and amend the changelog and comment: Change the condition from !rcu_is_watching() to is_idle_task(current) || rcu_is_watching() which enforces that interrupts in the idle task unconditionally invoke rcu_irq_enter() independent of the RCU state. For most scenarios is_idle_task() would be sufficient but Task RCU needs it according to Paul. Thanks, tglx