Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200611215501.213058-1-vitor@massaru.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200611215501.213058-1-vitor@massaru.org>
From:   David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Date:   Sat, 13 Jun 2020 14:56:43 +0800
Message-ID: <CABVgOSkMv22GDGin8GCqq4Vd=Bff7-VzEycmzKhUeKj9tErD7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: kunit_test_overflow: add KUnit test of
 check_*_overflow functions
To:     Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>
Cc:     KUnit Development <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
        linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 5:55 AM Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org> wrote:
>
> This adds the convertion of the runtime tests of check_*_overflow fuctions,
> from `lib/test_overflow.c`to KUnit tests.

Nit: couple of minor typos here: convertion -> conversion, and
functions -> functions

> The log similar to the one seen in dmesg running test_overflow can be
> seen in `test.log`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@massaru.org>

I've tested that this builds and runs on my system, and it all seems
to be working fine!

Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

> ---
>  lib/Kconfig.debug         |  17 ++
>  lib/Makefile              |   1 +
>  lib/kunit_overflow_test.c | 590 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 608 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 lib/kunit_overflow_test.c

Echoing what Brendan and Kees mentioned, it'd be nicer to have this
replace the existing test, both because there's no need for redundant
tests (one will get out-of-date), and so that we can have a nice diff
showing the changes made as part of the conversion.

Cheers,
-- David