Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964903AbWCWAbM (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:31:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932690AbWCWAbM (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:31:12 -0500 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.141]:51158 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932686AbWCWAbK (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:31:10 -0500 Message-ID: <4421EC44.7010500@us.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:31:00 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060309) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Wright CC: Andi Kleen , Xen-devel , Wim Coekaerts , Chris Wright , Christopher Li , Linux Kernel Mailing List , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Linus Torvalds , Anne Holler , Jan Beulich , Jyothy Reddy , Kip Macy , Ky Srinivasan , Leendert van Doorn Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/24] i386 Vmi code patching References: <200603131802.k2DI2nv8005665@zach-dev.vmware.com> <200603222115.46926.ak@suse.de> <20060322214025.GJ15997@sorel.sous-sol.org> In-Reply-To: <20060322214025.GJ15997@sorel.sous-sol.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1422 Lines: 44 Chris Wright wrote: > * Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de) wrote: > >> The disassembly stuff indeed doesn't look like something >> that belongs in the kernel. >> > > Strongly agreed. The strict ABI requirements put forth here are not > in-line with Linux, IMO. I think source compatibility is the limit of > reasonable, and any ROM code be in-tree if something like this were to > be viable upstream. > Hi Chris, Would you have less trouble if the "ROM" were actually more like a module? Specifically, if it had a proper elf header and symbol table, used symbols as entry points, and was a GPL interface (so that ROM's had to be GPL)? Then it's just a kernel module that's hidden in the option ROM space and has a C interface. I know you end up losing the ability to do crazy inlining of the ROM code but I think it becomes a much less hairy interface that way. Regards, Anthony Liguori > thanks, > -chris > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Virtualization mailing list > Virtualization@lists.osdl.org > https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/