Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp1001557ybt; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 07:07:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw9uGSvLeV1q0hIMCmPYV9XHWwSyUK38UIuAA4jxeBvk6ndr3rO4AZ2zQgwyEJjb6OBSqnB X-Received: by 2002:a50:a418:: with SMTP id u24mr20638968edb.141.1592143661520; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 07:07:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592143661; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rwkIsqZ0VrgT0EzduoPHDUKCT+9FJ3WDxqK4XMh9ZF2FMgl8bCElQ6j8u6ClgQ5H5O wlNjRrVQ6tZKSz1IuB/6TuD2G1s8l8MboSkDPXZRo0Zj/K+TVL/o+WUSnaAIBjVPvoaX ltK4iLmiWEd0iJXSEPq7qG640H21/SdZG2H5TLO39B3yLFnTpDYCswwbJYVIujjx7zl/ /RtDSWCNiMfgtLUybcFjEFRBuyE7OZNrwGnrV8VkJxvdIdDVIiqQzQY38RHJhp1rGMnG Z1aTVwkBsHbQmzPFsTKhvbTT8quTXgJfx18sAi/b+D9hRWRkHXVaC2Jo8D9uk0j4NLp8 iF/A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=LcWl/d+ugS8JsY92bW4QwJg7sQz4FDxUTrLcA4UrusM=; b=jASDzgO99iFHZt7zvXhI2JdmM0kzlodQbXLPAtm8xB4X80dpRwZA+SpFXA5WtsoGWX +KWPgJmxqdqSUSeI4CpDFXfI7LMHfVeBGgZJUbJLXAHDxtFuLe4ND4SfxXQyCedLigei tjfSerav/E20p6E350FcOrRzehWJIah8I14C+WwNyG13TJwaDv+m7mcaUoy6fXGECXKS cQKgA/Oc+TcVahLIQ0VxqaScMfb4c+KeFKzW8odH9/VGbUtiZ2Bczqo0adIJ2WPyZv1j DYeApgseKNZ2nLTljkl7PnjuvZ7N6aL+fYocuI0R2WAT46G5lX3BChuiNDjBOAgqs02a PbHw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=sW1P1kjY; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f1si7185871ejh.665.2020.06.14.07.07.18; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 07:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=sW1P1kjY; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726824AbgFNOFg (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 14 Jun 2020 10:05:36 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48138 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725815AbgFNOFg (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Jun 2020 10:05:36 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BB6D2068E; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:05:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592143534; bh=0mFPGq9ZQ3DaTv72v947D8KCJ0CgZsUjqDrhCodkraY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=sW1P1kjYmycL7YPadTEgKDzwhmyN3gHb1LVXHfZnFBUJAkuItTfwE0tLU4W6ZCgKw hyRQvkGzC2AZHphuHIneL5rqvVEo5wB+zcB9hS7i61SUZH+fseDj/r1C1BuvPdnzbA qMVY5IdbEPH+EFyph2oLMbWw1FvISelJouRZj5Eg= Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 16:05:31 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Ricardo Ferreira Cc: Larry Finger , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Florian Schilhabel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nishka Dasgupta , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: rtl8712: Addressed checkpatch.pl issues related to macro parameter wrapping in parentheses. Message-ID: <20200614140531.GA2661398@kroah.com> References: <20200614135125.19502-1-rikajff@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200614135125.19502-1-rikajff@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 02:51:25PM +0100, Ricardo Ferreira wrote: > #define init_h2fwcmd_w_parm_no_rsp(pcmd, pparm, code) \ > do {\ > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcmd->list);\ > - pcmd->cmdcode = code;\ > - pcmd->parmbuf = (u8 *)(pparm);\ > - pcmd->cmdsz = sizeof(*pparm);\ > - pcmd->rsp = NULL;\ > - pcmd->rspsz = 0;\ > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(pcmd)->list);\ > + (pcmd)->cmdcode = code;\ > + (pcmd)->parmbuf = (u8 *)((pparm));\ > + (pcmd)->cmdsz = sizeof(*(pparm));\ > + (pcmd)->rsp = NULL;\ > + (pcmd)->rspsz = 0;\ > } while (0) Does that change really make any sense? checkpatch is a nice hint, sometimes it is not correct...