Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sun, 14 Jun 2020 23:15:19 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To:     SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.com>
Cc:     akpm@linux-foundation.org, apw@canonical.com, joe@perches.com,
        colin.king@canonical.com, sj38.park@gmail.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Recommend blocklist/allowlist instead of
 blacklist/whitelist
Message-ID: <20200614211519.GA24529@amd>
References: <20200610065223.29894-1-sjpark@amazon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200610065223.29894-1-sjpark@amazon.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed 2020-06-10 08:52:21, SeongJae Park wrote:
> From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
>=20
> This patchset 1) adds support of deprecated terms in the 'checkpatch.pl'
> and 2) set the 'blacklist' and 'whitelist' as deprecated with
> replacement suggestion of 'blocklist' and 'allowlist', because the
> suggestions are incontrovertible, doesn't make people hurt, and more
> self-explanatory.

I don't think this is good idea.
									Pavel
--=20
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo=
g.html

--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAl7mk2cACgkQMOfwapXb+vLdagCeOR5JKISvWfny5Q5LH9Mf+/9D
bTUAn2juu4+GYlwTPt3BzAFFY/e08oeD
=APHk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz--