Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200614123923.99189-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
 <20200614123923.99189-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com> <CAAmzW4N6ycsp+W_hGA03W-QVCxE6Jqo0mvjajK9ZuY1M596wSg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAmzW4N6ycsp+W_hGA03W-QVCxE6Jqo0mvjajK9ZuY1M596wSg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:20:45 +0800
Message-ID: <CAMZfGtWFNnSLa6KQwG3CK9xjWkqE9OKfVZpaZurQArRSzG+FTg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/slub: Use node_nr_slabs() instead
 of slabs_node()
To:     Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc:     Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 2:15 PM Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2020=EB=85=84 6=EC=9B=94 14=EC=9D=BC (=EC=9D=BC) =EC=98=A4=ED=9B=84 9:39,=
 Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>=EB=8B=98=EC=9D=B4 =EC=9E=91=EC=84=
=B1:
> >
> > In the some code, we already get the kmem_cache_node, so we can
> > use node_nr_slabs() directly instead of slabs_node(). Check the
> > condition of n->nr_partial can also be removed because we can get
> > the correct result via node_nr_slabs().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
>
> If appying this patch, there is no reference to slabs_node(). Please remo=
ve it.
>
> Thanks.

OK, Thanks. I will remove it in the next version.

--=20
Yours,
Muchun