Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:21:36 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: fix AHCI_SHT() macro definition
Message-ID: <20200615072136.GB21903@lst.de>
References: <CGME20200612120932eucas1p29411e0c60963fad8c36ca35f2e6b8872@eucas1p2.samsung.com> <0d803e72-b15e-4673-4858-4741f2772fc4@samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0d803e72-b15e-4673-4858-4741f2772fc4@samsung.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 02:09:31PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Fix AHCI_SHT() macro definition to not reinitialize .can_queue and
> .sdev_attrs fields.
> 
> This removes gcc warnings from W=1 builds such as:

I think these warnings arg bogus, at least when used with cases like
libata that want to implement inheritance schemes.  Can we get them
removed from W=1 insted if people really are about W=1 builds?