Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp1613096ybt; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 05:07:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx0KINLA+AxF/uZqCgLoKnV1P/3EKJ0zeMdCyz2Pv8SPQRMUYl+GnGYacwN8TaLhNLSOkd7 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f291:: with SMTP id gu17mr26314267ejb.411.1592222871030; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 05:07:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592222871; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vgfBaEhJJO+vJXFKi5WTSGpsjXBv2neOmmz3idgx1GlgEhh2dKxC3RiWI9MWB/pkH1 aTyCGdpYB0DRper2pkNnPQR7lpcSm0W18DZdQe0ln8jOBa73EdeLzSsath+03sIprwcP OMK8IcPcyIHdEOmN7UkzbGOb5xVjq6XZzFF/lpbXtD/RCe3zMgGZFqc2haF/uquL7XJK 0v+3BOvoqU8AfGnz9tKGKPemxfIaMCcaWD4ajPxVP0WoK7qycYCNpeRJ2k1wposchVQl xIDhd9pswSY9K3jn6v8kvFXZECiXPaAVErPL49I83K+mwfHnjNT6RW01Nq0EXwE7wv1j vqKg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=Xpfg1mk0V6CBsC6TrQKwyTdkb1V2Phswtkfib8peGmc=; b=G2FtcyDR3Ze1C48a5cZIkT8TsSoasNbyTci27zuEmNKFcPHlgX0xi2PWc4TogyzC7m R02NWprqFLk/xtIZX6SEj8pLses2aa9jsqlH+8UGZkHdDgpOyEH3NHCTlt5tHnIYU6Tx OzUxiHXilYOqEbnZvLIqUrFMPk42+yqnRdfk4arDJJnzXbvN/ls3590j1nZDGaAOyevs agDZkhO+KkzgEx0N8aDsHvBrxnb5TRfyErivJbB7CMv+HwSCN73slm4gKdLvf5ygGYtW DvHGTmX/K4hrSgC/Q3Kfg8Aua15cjhB6m1Hfo5Zo/iJRnN2JxxgJ1GRVDt6F21fO/szs E27w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d15si7985053edp.112.2020.06.15.05.07.27; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 05:07:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729771AbgFOMFF (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:05:05 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:12264 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728510AbgFOMFD (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:05:03 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05FB5Lut027139; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:04:57 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31mua645xr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:04:57 -0400 Received: from m0098394.ppops.net (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 05FBhtnf016311; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:04:56 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 31mua645wp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:04:56 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05FC1aVK012672; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:04:54 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 31mpe7ufwe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:04:54 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 05FC4qoe56098948 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:04:52 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187FC4C050; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:04:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAF94C052; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:04:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc3871087118.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.184.141]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:04:51 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:04:50 +0200 From: Alexander Gordeev To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Stefano Brivio , Andrew Morton , Yury Norov , Rasmus Villemoes , Pablo Neira Ayuso , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] bitmap: Add test for bitmap_cut() Message-ID: <20200615120449.GA28317@oc3871087118.ibm.com> References: <5fc45e6bbd4fa837cd9577f8a0c1d639df90a4ce.1592155364.git.sbrivio@redhat.com> <20200615094155.GQ2428291@smile.fi.intel.com> <20200615094616.GS2428291@smile.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200615094616.GS2428291@smile.fi.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216,18.0.687 definitions=2020-06-15_02:2020-06-15,2020-06-15 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1011 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 cotscore=-2147483648 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006150089 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:46:16PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:41:55PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 07:40:54PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote: > > > Inspired by an original patch from Yury Norov: introduce a test for > > > bitmap_cut() that also makes sure functionality is as described for > > > partially overlapping src and dst. > > > > Taking into account recent fixes for BE 64-bit, do we have test cases for a such? > > It might be enough to have only these, but perhaps s390 guys can help? > > Alexander, can you apply this patch (w/o the first one, which is suppose to > fix) and confirm that you have test case failure, followed by applying first > one and confirm a fix? This failure goes away when patch #1 is applied: test_bitmap: [lib/test_bitmap.c:666] bitmaps contents differ: expected "0-16,18-19,21,24,26-27,29", got "1,3-4,6,9,11-12,14,16,18-19,21,24,26-27,29" Thus, I confirm. [...] > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >