Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932091AbWCWJKR (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 04:10:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932100AbWCWJKR (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 04:10:17 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:24623 "EHLO fmsmga101-1.fm.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751394AbWCWJKO convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 04:10:14 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.03,121,1141632000"; d="scan'208"; a="15334356:sNHT194295822" Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: RE: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT] Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:10:00 +0800 Message-ID: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F840B4692FA@pdsmsx403> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT] Thread-Index: AcZOQtBTmKUOxVwsQ++AyGpkbwBiLAAEEveg From: "Yu, Luming" To: "Sanjoy Mahajan" Cc: , "Linus Torvalds" , "Andrew Morton" , "Tom Seeley" , "Dave Jones" , "Jiri Slaby" , , , "Brian Marete" , "Ryan Phillips" , , "Brown, Len" , , "Mark Lord" , "Randy Dunlap" , , "Duncan" <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>, "Pavlik Vojtech" , "Meelis Roos" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Mar 2006 09:10:02.0675 (UTC) FILETIME=[917F9030:01C64E59] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1592 Lines: 40 > Good, then the hang should be caused by: > > Store (Arg0, HCSL) > Store (ShiftLeft (Arg1, 0x01), HMAD) > Store (Arg2, HMCM) > Store (0x0B, HMPR) > > Could you add this at the beginning of this block: > Store (Arg0, Debug) > And add this at the end of this block: > Store( HMPR, Debug) > >I added those two lines to the DSDT with only THM0 zone, but with >nothing else commented out. Below are the dmesgs for one sleep-wake >cycle, plus an 'acpi -t'. I thought it would hang if I did one more >cycle, but it didn't. So I tried five more, and it was fine too. > >Then I reset /proc/acpi/acpi_debug_layer to 0x10 (the boot paramater is >acpi_dbg_layer although the /proc file is acpi_debug_layer), and >unloaded and reloaded the thermal module. And it hung in the >(expected) >two cycles. I've seen this behavior before: It won't hang with lots of >debugging turned on, but it does hang with less debugging. Strange! Hmmm, then I cannot get the ec access log for hang case?! acpi_hw_low_level_read(8, data, &ec->common.data_addr); ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Read [%02x] from address [%02x]\n", *data, address)); Does it mean we need to slow down acpi_ec_intr_read/write ? Could you try to insert acpi_os_stall (100) after ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT statement both in acpi_ec_intr_read/write. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/