Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751051AbWCWLTj (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 06:19:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751053AbWCWLTj (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 06:19:39 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.202]:36897 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751017AbWCWLTi convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 06:19:38 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ELO6nb2EHk85rl1CSNCTJqASTCZiol/sRyPlfMocSieZWcT7bns/QS9qi1Mm77X9nGF+MIoaA7o5QvzzNGoXgAxfLoP5ttRZLhzr0rtPsO0+3WQwz7EZZBj+xnAQfKoMQ9b0Cmpv2XCj70UucPrOcIwdz6/azC9el1rJC6yjgqU= Message-ID: <9a8748490603230319q5ad06eb2m25d1f3ad4b969000@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:19:37 +0100 From: "Jesper Juhl" To: "Con Kolivas" Subject: Re: swap prefetching merge plans Cc: "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ck@vds.kolivas.org In-Reply-To: <200603231804.36334.kernel@kolivas.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060322205305.0604f49b.akpm@osdl.org> <200603231804.36334.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2008 Lines: 42 On 3/23/06, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 03:53 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > > A look at the -mm lineup for 2.6.17: > > > mm-implement-swap-prefetching.patch > > mm-implement-swap-prefetching-fix.patch > > mm-implement-swap-prefetching-tweaks.patch > > > Still don't have a compelling argument for this, IMO. > > For those users who feel they do have a compelling argument for it, please > speak now or I'll end up maintaining this in -ck only forever. I've come to > depend on it with my workloads now so I'm never dropping it. There's no point > me explaining how it is useful yet again, though, because I just end up > looking like I'm handwaving. It seems a shame for it not to be available to > all linux users. > I certainly like it and see a bennefit. My situation is like this: A KDE desktop with OpenOffice, Lyx, Firefox, Eclipse, Gimp & a bunch of xterms running more or less permanently. When I work on kernel stuff I often end up running "make clean ; make allyesconfig ; make" and the build and especially final link of the kernel usually kills the box for a while, so I tend to walk away and come back a while later when it's done. Where I see the bennefit of swap prefetch is when I come back to my box after such a build and pull one of my other running apps back to the foreground. The apps come back noticably faster when I'm running a swap prefetching kernel - we are not talking massive amounts of time, just a few seconds, but it's enough for me to notice when I sometimes happen to run a mainline kernel without swap prefetch. -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/